Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

CA2: Eyewitness report and identification of ptf was probable cause for arrest

Eyewitness report and identification was probable cause for arrest, so summary judgment was proper for the officer. Tortora v. City of New York, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 8135 (2d Cir. Mar. 12, 2020).* The court credits the officers’ testimony that … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Eyewitness report and identification of ptf was probable cause for arrest

NE: No IAC for not objecting to authentication of cell phone records obtained by SW

It was speculation that if the defense had objected to authentication of cell phone records obtained by search warrant that the objection would have been sustained. No IAC on this ground. State v. Sierra, 305 Neb. 249 (Mar. 13, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NE: No IAC for not objecting to authentication of cell phone records obtained by SW

D.Nev.: No motions through six continuances and past motions deadline all untimely

After six continuances in 18 months or so, the defendants’ motion to suppress and other motions filed on the eve of trial are denied as untimely. United States v. Phillips, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42782 (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No motions through six continuances and past motions deadline all untimely

W.D.Mo.: Govt couldn’t rely on Strieff where there was no RS to begin with

The government’s motion to reconsider is denied. It can’t justify the stop under Strieff because “[a]t the time the officer activated his lights and ordered Mullins to approach, he not only lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry stop, he … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Govt couldn’t rely on Strieff where there was no RS to begin with

CA2: Arrest for selling crack justifies search incident

Arrest for selling crack justified a search incident, and the district court erred in holding otherwise. United States v. Williams, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 6768 (2d Cir. Mar. 4, 2020). The evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion the search was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA2: Arrest for selling crack justifies search incident

E.D.La.: Despite apparent validity of motion to suppress never pursued, defense counsel kept evidence out of plea colloquy, so no IAC because of strategy call

Defense counsel didn’t file a motion to suppress evidence because defendant’s stop likely was without reasonable suspicion, and a motion to suppress might well have been granted. However, there was a legitimate strategic reason for not moving to suppress which … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Despite apparent validity of motion to suppress never pursued, defense counsel kept evidence out of plea colloquy, so no IAC because of strategy call

D.Minn.: Consent to seize cell phone was voluntary; def wasn’t even seized

Consent to seizure of defendant’s cell phone was voluntary: “There is no evidence in the record suggesting Thompson’s consent to turn over her phone was involuntary. The request for her phone occurred in a public place and the entirety of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Consent to seize cell phone was voluntary; def wasn’t even seized

CA6: Shooting a teenager who pulled a toy gun on an officer for 2 seconds still has QI

The officer here shot a teenage boy who had a toy gun on him that looked real. He reached for it and dropped it, but reaching for it and pulling it out, even for two seconds before dropping it, was … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting a teenager who pulled a toy gun on an officer for 2 seconds still has QI

GA: SW for “electronic data” includes photos on a cell phone

Defendant claimed to be staying in a vacant apartment with the permission of a friend (who was not the landlord). There was probable cause to arrest him for theft of services (not to mention trespass). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW for “electronic data” includes photos on a cell phone

N.D.Ohio: An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers

An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers. In addition: “Here, Patrolmen Link and McClamroch had received information that a retaliatory shooting could occur near the location they stopped … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers

TX8: Def has no standing to complain of writ of attachment on a witness

“[W]e conclude that Fernandez made no showing at trial of an invasion of his own rights to establish he had standing to complain of the State’s use of the writ of attachment to secure the attendance for trial of complaining … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on TX8: Def has no standing to complain of writ of attachment on a witness

D.Mont.: Tracking warrant issue date was a typo; whether state law was complied with doesn’t matter in federal court

The tracking warrant issue date was mistaken. The court finds it was the latter of two dates, and the tracking occurred for only five days, within the requirements of Rule 41(e)(2)(C). Whether the tracking warrant complied with state law is … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Tracking warrant issue date was a typo; whether state law was complied with doesn’t matter in federal court

CA6: FRCP 60(b) can’t be used to backdoor a successor habeas

Habeas petitioner’s attempt to use Rule 60(b) to attack the rejection of a Fourth Amendment claim was a backdoor successor habeas that doesn’t satisfy grounds for one. In re Henderson, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4856 (6th Cir. Feb. 14, 2020)*:

Posted in Abstention, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: FRCP 60(b) can’t be used to backdoor a successor habeas

E.D.Tenn.: Collective knowledge doesn’t require the stopping officer even know about it

“‘[W]e impute collective knowledge among multiple law enforcement agencies, even when the evidence demonstrates that the responding officer was wholly unaware’ of the specific relevant facts. (Doc. 194, at 24 (quoting United States v. Lyons, 687 F.3d 754, 766 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Collective knowledge doesn’t require the stopping officer even know about it

OH10: Judge who issued SW wasn’t barred from handling trial

The judge who signed the wiretap warrants in this case was not barred from conducting the trial. State v. Pippins, 2020-Ohio-503, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 467 (10th Dist. Feb. 13, 2020). Second successive 2255 habeas petition is denied, including his … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH10: Judge who issued SW wasn’t barred from handling trial

CA11: CoA granted to pursue 4A IAC claim

2255 appellant gets a CoA to appeal an ineffective assistance of counsel that defense counsel did not pursue a valid motion to suppress. (A prima facie case was apparently made.) Spriggs v. United States, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: CoA granted to pursue 4A IAC claim

NE: Failure to show any prejudice in 4A IAC claim doomed post-conviction case

Defense counsel at trial didn’t object to a search. Appellate counsel attempted to argue it but it was waived. Post-conviction counsel doesn’t even attempt to show prejudice from the failure of trial counsel. Affirmed. State v. Assad, 304 Neb. 979 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: Failure to show any prejudice in 4A IAC claim doomed post-conviction case

S.D.Ind.: Lawyer not ineffective for not telling co-def’s counsel of a potential 4A claim

A lawyer can’t be ineffective for not raising a Fourth Amendment claim where there was no standing. In addition, he can’t be ineffective for not telling the lawyer for the person with standing about a search issue. It wouldn’t even … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Lawyer not ineffective for not telling co-def’s counsel of a potential 4A claim

OH8: No IAC for not arguing prior authority should be overruled

Appellate counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing that a prior decision should be overruled when it would not likely be. State v. Newton, 2020-Ohio-376, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 340 (8th Dist. Jan. 30, 2020).* Defendant’s claims of deficient performance were … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH8: No IAC for not arguing prior authority should be overruled

WY: Plain error does not apply to unargued points in motion to suppress; however, IAC shown on lack of RS to extend stop

Plain error does not apply to any search issue not preserved below. In an IAC claim, defendant showed, even with this limited record, the likelihood that he could have prevailed in a motion to suppress for lack of reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on WY: Plain error does not apply to unargued points in motion to suppress; however, IAC shown on lack of RS to extend stop