Category Archives: Protective sweep

FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress under the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement because the trial court’s finding that the detective’s intrusion onto the curtilage was justified for officer safety was not supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

There was no reasonable suspicion for a protective weapons search. Without reasonable suspicion, all cars are subject to search without cause, thereby nullifying the Fourth Amendment. Defendant was stopped in his driveway, and there was also an effort to call … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: RS still required for a Long protective weapons search of a car

W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

After defendant’s car was stopped, the officers conducted a Michigan v. Long protective weapons search of the car while gaining control of the defendant, and a gun was located. There was a search incident: “Furthermore, he was standing at the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Protective sweep, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: After gun was found in car, search incident and automobile exception didn’t apply, but inventory was inevitable [right result, wrong reasoning]

PA: Lifting floor mat in protective weapons search of car was reasonable

Lifting the floor mat during a protective weapons search of a car is reasonable. Defendant’s IAC claim fails because the search was valid. Commonwealth v. Watley, 2016 PA Super 311, 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 810 (Dec. 29, 2016). A 911 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on PA: Lifting floor mat in protective weapons search of car was reasonable

D.N.M.: Both protective sweep and emergency aid justifications fail for lack of objective facts somebody else was there

Where there are no articulable facts somebody else might be present in the house, the protective sweep doctrine can’t be relied on. Likewise with the emergency aid doctrine. Here there was a 911 hang up call, but the critical fact … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Both protective sweep and emergency aid justifications fail for lack of objective facts somebody else was there

WA: Arrest on def’s porch does not justify protective sweep of his house

Defendant stepped out of his house onto a small covered porch where he was arrested. The protective sweep of the house violated the state constitution. The officers could see a woman inside. Nevertheless, a protective sweep of a house after … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Arrest on def’s porch does not justify protective sweep of his house

CO: Stop in high crime area, false name, and large knife on floor justified protective weapons search

The protective weapons search of defendant’s car was valid. The stop occurred in an area known for frequent criminal activity, defendant gave the officer a false name, and he observed a large knife on the front floorboard near defendant’s feet. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: Stop in high crime area, false name, and large knife on floor justified protective weapons search

D.Kan.: Protective sweep is different from search incident; search of trunk was excessive as a protective sweep

A protective sweep is different from a search incident and they are founded on different precepts. The search of the car interior was valid as a protective sweep, but the trunk was not. United States v. Cooks, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Protective sweep is different from search incident; search of trunk was excessive as a protective sweep

CA7: RS of drugs in a backpack was justification for frisk for gun; taking key to do a protective sweep of apt before seeking consent was valid on this record

Defendant’s frisk for weapons was justified because there was reasonable suspicion he had drugs in a backpack that had been deposited in an apartment, which defendant lied about going to. Drugs and firearms “go hand in hand,” (See, e.g., United … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: RS of drugs in a backpack was justification for frisk for gun; taking key to do a protective sweep of apt before seeking consent was valid on this record

WV: Protective weapons search of def’s pants on ground while EMTs treating him was reasonable

Defendant had been patted down and nothing was found, but he was wounded and EMTs were there. His pants were removed, and he was being treated. Before the ambulance took him away, he asked for his pants and the officer … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WV: Protective weapons search of def’s pants on ground while EMTs treating him was reasonable

NJ: Protective sweep requires at least some slight justification another person may be present; here, there was none

A woman called police as a victim of domestic violence. When they arrived, she was in her car, and she gave an address of where her assailant was but no name. They go to that address and enter, and then … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NJ: Protective sweep requires at least some slight justification another person may be present; here, there was none

TN: The host had common authority over the guest’s part of the premises; he was only there every other night

Defendant had been staying every other night with his brother who stayed in the property leased by Ms. Bryant. She had common authority over that room and went in it all the time. The trial court did not err in … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TN: The host had common authority over the guest’s part of the premises; he was only there every other night

CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

NYPD’s crime scene entry at the scene of a murder and protective sweep were all valid because of the exigency of the entry. Drug and other evidence was in plain view. [There are no facts talking about standing, or whether … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Murder scene entry resulted in valid protective sweep and plain view

NC: Knock-and-talk led to smell of raw marijuana and then a valid protective sweep

A CI said that defendant’s house was the target of potential marijuana robbery with AK-47s, the police went there to do a knock-and-talk. When the door was opened, defendant didn’t seem to understand English, and the officers smelled raw marijuana, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Knock and talk, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NC: Knock-and-talk led to smell of raw marijuana and then a valid protective sweep

NY3: Fight in one room didn’t justify protective sweep of back rooms

Police responded to a disturbance call and heard a fight going on inside. The door was unlocked and they entered. They separated the combatants, and then the wife of the non-aggressor entered the room and sat down, too. They decided … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on NY3: Fight in one room didn’t justify protective sweep of back rooms

AK: Protective sweep could precede probation search

The challenged part of the home search here was a protective sweep before a probation search, and it was reasonable. Elisoff v. State, 2016 Alas. App. LEXIS 118 (June 22, 2016) (mem.).* 2255 petitioner’s claim that his defense counsel was … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Protective sweep could precede probation search

CA1: Seizure of a cell phone to get a SW was proper; frisk of jacket for weapon was, too

Officers suspected defendant of sex trafficking, and Detroit PD called the Portland ME PD to report he was there, likely with a young girl. He was known to them as a prior sex trafficker. They found him at a hotel … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA1: Seizure of a cell phone to get a SW was proper; frisk of jacket for weapon was, too

D.R.I.: Protective sweep of car justified by def being, inter alia, in a violent biker gang and having a 19 pg criminal history

Protective sweep of car was justified because defendant was a member of a violent biker gang, nervousness, 19-page criminal history, volunteering he hadn’t been drinking when not asked, among other things. United States v. Severns, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76103 … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Protective sweep of car justified by def being, inter alia, in a violent biker gang and having a 19 pg criminal history

E.D.Mo.: 911 call of burglary in progress and open door with blood justified entry

911 received a burglary in progress report, and officers responded finding the door open and damaged, blood on the broken window, and the home alarm going off. Exigent circumstances permitted the entry because it was reasonable to infer that the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: 911 call of burglary in progress and open door with blood justified entry

MA: Def’s furtive movement was hiding a small quantity of MJ, and that didn’t justify search of the backseat area when he was out of car

During a traffic stop, defendant lifted himself up consistent with hiding something, and that justified an order to get out of the car. When only a small quantity of marijuana was found, the exigency dissipated, and a search of the … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on MA: Def’s furtive movement was hiding a small quantity of MJ, and that didn’t justify search of the backseat area when he was out of car