Category Archives: Franks doctrine

CA2: In a § 1983 case alleging lack of PC from omission of information to issuing magistrate, it’s ptf’s burden

In this § 1983 case there was probable cause for issuance of an animal abuse warrant. To argue the probable cause was tainted by omission of information, plaintiff carries the burden, and here she failed. Kanciper v. Lato, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA2: In a § 1983 case alleging lack of PC from omission of information to issuing magistrate, it’s ptf’s burden

MD: Def agreed to postpone suppression hearing until trial and then didn’t bring it up; invited error and not preserved

Defendant failed to preserve his Fourth Amendment claims for appeal. You don’t get a hearing just by asking. He didn’t make a proffer in his Franks motion which was enough to deny it. Then, whatever issue was left, the defense … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MD: Def agreed to postpone suppression hearing until trial and then didn’t bring it up; invited error and not preserved

D.Mass.: Def’s quibbling in a Franks challenge is insufficient: “I’m just a ‘drug dealer’ not a ‘drug trafficker.’”

Defendant is quibbling rather than making a bona fide Franks argument that he was arraigned 11 times not 10 on other drug cases and that he was a “drug trafficker” when he insists he is just a “drug dealer.” One … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def’s quibbling in a Franks challenge is insufficient: “I’m just a ‘drug dealer’ not a ‘drug trafficker.’”

CA8: Def failed to show omission of CI’s background would have vitiated PC

“Claybron argues that the omission of the confidential informant’s background information weighed so heavily on her credibility that, had it been considered, the warrant would not have issued. ‘We review the trial court’s findings of fact for clear error and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA8: Def failed to show omission of CI’s background would have vitiated PC

RI: Cell phone SW aff omission of reference to 300 other text messages to and from others wasn’t material for Franks

Omission of the fact that there were 300 text messages from the affidavit for search warrant between defendant’s text to victim and acquiring the phone was not material for probable cause purposes. Omission of references to others wasn’t material: “Although … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on RI: Cell phone SW aff omission of reference to 300 other text messages to and from others wasn’t material for Franks

W.D.Ky.: Lack of detail in a report on a knock-and-talk didn’t amount to a material omission for Franks purposes

A Franks challenge requires affidavits or other sworn testimony as an offer of proof. Franks, 438 U.S. at 171. Defendant doesn’t provide any. On the merits of the search and seizure claim, it started with a knock-and-talk, and they are … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Lack of detail in a report on a knock-and-talk didn’t amount to a material omission for Franks purposes

CA11: Franks challenge fails; officer’s frank admission of mistake [apparently] helped show mere negligence in including it

The mistake in the affidavit was just negligent and it didn’t undermine the probable cause at all. Besides that, there was an independent source for all the information in the warrant that was probable cause. United States v. Reddick, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA11: Franks challenge fails; officer’s frank admission of mistake [apparently] helped show mere negligence in including it

GA: Def not compelled to perform breath tests, so no self-incrimination issue

Defendant was not compelled to perform breath tests, so the Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination clause did not apply. State v. Council, 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 531 (Oct. 30, 2017).* In a Franks challenge, “The Court is tasked with reassessing the probable … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on GA: Def not compelled to perform breath tests, so no self-incrimination issue

CA2: Correcting the alleged false statements in affidavit still leaves PC so officials have QI

Deleting the allegedly false information from the affidavit for search warrant leaving it as a “corrected” affidavit under Franks, there still was a fair probability for probable cause. That there might be other explanations doesn’t undermine probable cause. Therefore, defendants … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Correcting the alleged false statements in affidavit still leaves PC so officials have QI

D.Nev.: Court gave a Franks hearing, but def didn’t make offer of proof to get one and failed on proof

Defendant got a suppression hearing to put on proof of a Franks violation, and he fails to show with any proof that the statements were reckless or material. Perhaps the court should have never ordered a hearing for a lack … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Court gave a Franks hearing, but def didn’t make offer of proof to get one and failed on proof

CA6: Alleged defect in state arrest warrant was irrelevant under the 4A where there was PC

Defendant’s arrest under a purportedly defective Georgia arrest warrant was irrelevant under the Fourth Amendment because there was plenty of probable cause for it. Specifically, defendant contended that the officers needed an incident report or something that showed probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Alleged defect in state arrest warrant was irrelevant under the 4A where there was PC

D.Kan.: Def’s pulling arms from sweatshirt sleeves was RS for frisk since hands weren’t visible

The officer had reasonable suspicion for a frisk of defendant with a 4:30 am stop and having to turn his back on defendant to investigate what was going on. Importantly, defendant kept pulling his arms out of his sleeves of … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Def’s pulling arms from sweatshirt sleeves was RS for frisk since hands weren’t visible

CA3: Def lacked standing to challenge search of co-def cell phone

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of a cell phone taken off a co-defendant that didn’t belong him. Besides, the search of that cell phone was valid. United States v. Brewer, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18003 (3d Cir. Sept. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Def lacked standing to challenge search of co-def cell phone

D.Minn.: Omission of CI’s criminal history didn’t mislead magistrate or wasn’t material to PC finding

Failing to include the CI’s criminal history didn’t mislead the magistrate issuing the warrant, and there was probable cause in any event, even without including it. Moreover, the issuing magistrate would have to fairly conclude the CI had criminal involvement. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Omission of CI’s criminal history didn’t mislead magistrate or wasn’t material to PC finding

CA5: Ptf in a 4A § 1983 case has to plead violation of a “clearly established right” to get over QI in complaint

Although an arrestee adequately alleged that members of a parish council and sheriff’s office maliciously conspired to prosecute him under an unconstitutional statute in retaliation for online comments about council members, his right was not clearly established because there was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf in a 4A § 1983 case has to plead violation of a “clearly established right” to get over QI in complaint

CA9: In a civil Franks claim, withheld SW affidavit tolls limitations until discovery

Plaintiff claimed judicial deception in obtaining search warrants for his home and computers over the death of his wife. When the state had the warrant affidavits sealed, the two year statute of limitations on his claim of judicial deception did … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: In a civil Franks claim, withheld SW affidavit tolls limitations until discovery

N.D.Ga.: A Franks challenge has to be more than just an argument over interpretation of meaning of facts

When the Franks challenge is more of a different interpretation of facts, it doesn’t suffice. “And, frankly, Defendant is just arguing that a different interpretation should be placed on his conduct than Agent Cunningham’s interpretation – or most likely the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: A Franks challenge has to be more than just an argument over interpretation of meaning of facts

CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

A search warrant was issued for alleged violations of the building code. Ignoring any alleged false statements that led to issuance of the search warrant, there still was probable cause. Gunnels v. Kenny, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 13204 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: § 1983 Franks violation: Ignoring alleged false statements still leaves PC

OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

The emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress. Here it was cattle. State v. Hershey, 286 Ore. App. 824, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 907 (July 19, 2017). There was plenty of probable cause, but defendant’s Franks argument that the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

D.Md.: 2255 Franks IAC claim fails for not showing what the false statements were and how PC was undermined

Defendant’s 2255 Franks IAC claim fails for not showing what the false statements were and how probable cause was undermined. United States v. Johnson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112806 (D. Md. July 20, 2017). Defendant’s moving his hands around in … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Md.: 2255 Franks IAC claim fails for not showing what the false statements were and how PC was undermined