Category Archives: Probable cause

AZ: Scent of marijuana alone is not probable cause in a medical marijuana state

The scent of marijuana alone is not probable cause in a medical marijuana state. More is required. State v. Sisco, 2015 Ariz. App. LEXIS 119 (July 20, 2015):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on AZ: Scent of marijuana alone is not probable cause in a medical marijuana state

NY3: Car on impound lot could be searched under automobile exception hours after the seizure where there was PC

The search of a car on a police impound lot hours after it was involved in an accident was proper under the automobile exception. People v. Hoffman, 2015 NY Slip Op 05976, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5844 (3d Dept. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Car on impound lot could be searched under automobile exception hours after the seizure where there was PC

IN: Smell of burnt MJ from car allows officer essentially to detain all

Defendant juvenile was a passenger in the back of a car stopped at 1:30 am, and there was a smell of burnt marijuana coming from the car. Under Pringle, that gave the officer cause to get everybody out of the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Smell of burnt MJ from car allows officer essentially to detain all

IA: Relevant criminal history entitled to at least some weight in the PC determination for a SW

The state argued that the Fourth Amendment claim wasn’t preserved. Rather than go there, the court goes to the merits, maybe because it was easier. There was a substantial basis for issuing the search warrant. Moreover, a defendant’s criminal history … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Relevant criminal history entitled to at least some weight in the PC determination for a SW

CA8: “Faint smell” of marijuana in a car is enough for a search; how do you differentiate?

The “faint smell” of marijuana in a car is enough for a search. The court declines to differentiate between faint and stronger. United States v. Smith, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10337 (8th Cir. June 19, 2015). Second successive 2255 raising … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: “Faint smell” of marijuana in a car is enough for a search; how do you differentiate?

E.D.N.Y.: Return of property motion denied because forfeiture action coming

A motion for return of property under Rule 41(g) was denied where the government represented that it was about to institute proceedings for forfeiture or a criminal proceedings. Motions for return of property are to be exercised sparingly and not … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Return of property motion denied because forfeiture action coming

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW for cell phones in RICO conspiracy showed PC that phones were used for planning crimes

In a RICO conspiracy case, the affidavit for a search warrant for cell phones to look for evidence of defendant’s using cell phones to plan crimes adequately showed probable cause to believe evidence of their contact would be found on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW for cell phones in RICO conspiracy showed PC that phones were used for planning crimes

OH9: Where the car in which defendant was a passenger was going to be inventoried, def’s detention for officer safety was reasonable

The continued detention of the defendant passenger in a car, incidental to the stop of the driver, pending the inventory of the car was reasonable. The trial court resolved a fact dispute and concluded that defendant consented to a search … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Where the car in which defendant was a passenger was going to be inventoried, def’s detention for officer safety was reasonable

N.D.Ga.: Def’s failure to respond to gov’t’s questioning his standing was waiver

Defendant has the burden of establishing standing. At the hearing, the government contested standing, and defendant didn’t respond or brief it. Therefore, standing was waived. United States v. Tolbert, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71047 (N.D.Ga. April 30, 2015).* Probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def’s failure to respond to gov’t’s questioning his standing was waiver

AR: State implied consent law doesn’t bar SW for blood, following weight of authority

State law on implied consent states that a refusal means “no [other] test will be given” but that does not preclude a search warrant for blood, following the weight of authority. Metzner v. State, 2015 Ark. 222, 2015 Ark. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: State implied consent law doesn’t bar SW for blood, following weight of authority

E.D.Wis.: Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing will support a SW; direct evidence not required

Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing is all that’s required for a search warrant to issue for a house. “Similarly, in United States v. Burton, 288 F.3d 91, 103 (3rd Cir. 2002), the court held that direct evidence of drug-dealing activity … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Circumstantial evidence of drug dealing will support a SW; direct evidence not required

TX2: Suppression hearing judge not free to draw conflicting inferences if PC shows in four corners of affidavit

On the question of probable cause, the fact that conflicting inferences could be drawn does not give the suppression hearing judge the power to determine that those other inferences control. Deference has to be given to the finding of probable … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX2: Suppression hearing judge not free to draw conflicting inferences if PC shows in four corners of affidavit

NJ: Reasonable for officer to follow arrested person back to room for ID; reasonable suspicion he was armed

The officer had reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant had been smoking marijuana, and he asked for ID. Defendant said it was in his room, so the officer said he’d have to follow defendant to get it. The officer noticed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Reasonable for officer to follow arrested person back to room for ID; reasonable suspicion he was armed

W.D.Ky.: An affidavit’s sufficiency is determined based on its actual contents, not what it allegedly lacks or could have been added

An affidavit’s sufficiency is determined based on its actual contents, not what it allegedly lacks or could have been added, citing United States v. Allen, 211 F.3d 970, 975 (6th Cir. 2000) (en banc)). This is a forgiving standard. Here, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: An affidavit’s sufficiency is determined based on its actual contents, not what it allegedly lacks or could have been added

S.D.N.Y.: Email warrant need only show “fair probability” evidence would be found in it; all emails for three years not overbroad in conspiracy case

Defendant’s email account, shown on a website as a “contact” email address, was accessed by a search warrant for evidence of her being involved in a fraud against the government. Direct evidence that an email account actually contains evidence is … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Email warrant need only show “fair probability” evidence would be found in it; all emails for three years not overbroad in conspiracy case

CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

Michigan Hutaree militia members were indicted, tried, and acquitted. Their Bivens action for malicious prosecution fails. The indictment was not based on provably false testimony, and there was thus probable cause for the case to go forward. “The indictment in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Indictment not founded on false facts precludes Bivens action

CA1: An investigation of sex with a child doesn’t automatically translate into child porn on def’s computer; affidavit purely conclusory

Defendant was under investigation by Puerto Rico police for lewd acts with a minor. There was no suggestion of child pornography. Thus, it was conclusory for the judge issuing the search warrant for defendant’s computer to find nexus or probable … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA1: An investigation of sex with a child doesn’t automatically translate into child porn on def’s computer; affidavit purely conclusory

KS: Controlled delivery doesn’t have to be hand-to-hand; picking up package from porch and taking it inside is enough

Defendant didn’t raise probable cause from the triggering event in an anticipatory warrant, but the suppression judge did. He directed the parties to litigate and brief it, so the issue was properly before the court. The triggering condition was acceptance … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on KS: Controlled delivery doesn’t have to be hand-to-hand; picking up package from porch and taking it inside is enough

TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal

Search incident cannot support a cell phone search under Riley. Riley came down between trial and appeal, so it applies here because the issue was preserved. Carter v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4271 (Tex. App. – Amarillo April 27, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on TX7: Riley applied to cell phone search incident where it came down between trial and appeal

CA4: Denial of consent to enter but admission of meth justified seizure of house to get a SW

Officers came to defendant’s house to do a knock-and-talk about a methamphetamine lab. “Then one of the troopers asked Appellant if he would consent to a search of the home. He refused to consent and informed the troopers they were … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Denial of consent to enter but admission of meth justified seizure of house to get a SW