Category Archives: Probable cause

N.D.Ohio: Trial testimony showed search was by consent, so no IAC

Defendant’s 2255 claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging a search is belied by trial testimony, the only suggestion there is, that the search was by consent. Francis v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 245228 (N.D. Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Trial testimony showed search was by consent, so no IAC

CA3 notes inventory policy not in evidence supporting § 1983 judgment and affirms

In a Fourth Amendment § 1983 case tried to a jury, the claim of an unreasonable inventory search prevailed before the jury. Yet, there was no written policy put into evidence by the parties. Affirmed on this ground. Watley v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3 notes inventory policy not in evidence supporting § 1983 judgment and affirms

IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped for a seat belt violation. The driver had no DL and he was handcuffed. While waiting for transport of the driver, the arresting officer engaged him in conversation. This was reasonable and … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

N.Y.Co.: Warrant to seize DNA includes state’s ability to test

When a warrant is obtained to get evidence, here DNA, a separate warrant isn’t required to test it. People v. Belliard, 2020 NY Slip Op 20346, 2020 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 10747 (N.Y. Co. Dec. 22, 2020). “The totality of the … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Warrant to seize DNA includes state’s ability to test

CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

The military trial judge erred in concluding that the search authorization required AFOSI complete information to determine probable cause for defendant’s DNA in a sex assault case. It’s not. Just because there were differing versions of how dressed the victim … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

OH7: Police going to def’s back window and video recording him in house violated curtilage

A police officer coming to the back of defendant’s house to look in the window and video him with a cell phone violated curtilage and his reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Desarro, 2020-Ohio-6815, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4661 (7th … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH7: Police going to def’s back window and video recording him in house violated curtilage

D.N.H.: Separate PC was shown even though stop was made to aid DEA investigation

Officers wanted defendant’s car stopped and probable cause for a searched developed because they didn’t want to reveal a DEA investigation. The traffic officer waited for a traffic violation and then developed probable cause during the stop. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Separate PC was shown even though stop was made to aid DEA investigation

CA8: DV order of protection and def’s seeking his firearms was PC for SW

Defendant was under a DV order of protection and repeatedly attempted to recover firearms from the police department, and that was probable cause for a warrant for his house. United States v. Bachler, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39772 (8th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: DV order of protection and def’s seeking his firearms was PC for SW

IN: Odor of MJ alone may not be enough for PC without showing training

On the facts of this case, the mere odor of marijuana wasn’t enough to show probable cause. The officers never explained why they believed that or what their training was. Bunnell v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 538 (Dec. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Odor of MJ alone may not be enough for PC without showing training

W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

Probable cause for arrest because of planning to commit a drug crime based on corroborated CI information without the drug transaction even happening. United States v. Kristopher, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236421 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 16, 2020) [e.g., attempt, conspiracy]. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: PC to arrest for a drug crime doesn’t require a completed crime

OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

“We concur with the trial court that Officer Sholl had a sufficient reasonable objective basis under the totality of the circumstances to frisk appellant for weapons. Appellant had a large fixed blade knife on his belt loop. A pat down … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Def’s large knife on his belt justified patdown for additional weapons

NE: Search of def’s car valid under automobile exception where he was late for third controlled buy

When defendant didn’t show up for his third controlled buy, police went to him and searched his car finding the drugs. They had probable cause for that search under the automobile exception. State v. Garza, 29 Neb. App. 223 (Dec. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: Search of def’s car valid under automobile exception where he was late for third controlled buy

NY2: Affidavit for SW for cell phone completely failed to show PC

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone completely failed to show probable cause to search it and seize photographs. People v. Boothe, 2020 NY Slip Op 07084. 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7311 (2d Dept. Nov. 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY2: Affidavit for SW for cell phone completely failed to show PC

TX: Totality of affidavit justified on totality SW for surveillance videos even though affidavit didn’t explicitly say so

While the affidavit for search warrant didn’t explicitly say that it wanted the DVR for surveillance cameras to prove a crime at the business, the totality of the affidavit leaves the impression from common knowledge that seizure and search was … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX: Totality of affidavit justified on totality SW for surveillance videos even though affidavit didn’t explicitly say so

E.D.Wis.: Clerical error in attaching wrong SW to affidavit where there were more than one for def could be corrected

A clerical error in attaching the wrong affidavit to multiple search warrants for defendant’s property could be read through and corrected. As to the probable cause, the affidavits showed it and the good faith exception would apply. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Clerical error in attaching wrong SW to affidavit where there were more than one for def could be corrected

OH11: Trial court’s order denying unsealing SW affidavit in post-conviction case wasn’t final and appealable

In a post-conviction case, the trial court’s order denying a motion to unseal a search warrant affidavit to facilitate his case was not a final appealable order. State v. Miller, 2020-Ohio-5383, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4231 (11th Dist. Nov. 23, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Standards of review, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH11: Trial court’s order denying unsealing SW affidavit in post-conviction case wasn’t final and appealable

UT: When two grounds support an arrest, attacking only one means affirmance

“Devenpeck, along with Utah appellate law, is controlling here. Whether Officer possessed probable cause to arrest Sanchez for DUI is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether the objective circumstances—the ‘known facts,’ see Devenpeck, 543 U.S. at 153—provided probable cause for … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on UT: When two grounds support an arrest, attacking only one means affirmance

OH2: Inventory and tow of vehicle disabled in accident was reasonable under community caretaking function

Defendant’s vehicle was inventoried and then towed by Dayton PD because it was disabled after an accident blocking a busy intersection. There was no warning to defendant it was going to happen. It was within the community caretaking function of … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Inventory and tow of vehicle disabled in accident was reasonable under community caretaking function

CA9: Officer opening car door and leaning inside was a search

“Because opening the car door and leaning into the car constituted an unlawful search under the Fourth Amendment, the panel considered what remedy is appropriate in this case. The panel held that the exclusionary rule applies to the loaded handgun … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on CA9: Officer opening car door and leaning inside was a search

S.D.N.Y.: Mental health detentions don’t require actual showing of dangerous behavior; probability enough

A mental health detention “requires only a ‘probability or substantial chance’ of dangerous behavior, not an actual showing of such behavior.’” … Probable cause for involuntary hospitalization may be established from ‘information gleaned from informants[,] … normally the putative victim … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Mental health detentions don’t require actual showing of dangerous behavior; probability enough