Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

D.D.C.: BOP employee had no REP in BOP owned work cell phone even though personal information was on it

BOP IG issued an administrative subpoena for respondent to produce her BOP owned cell phone, and she refused claiming a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. First, the standard of review is narrow and limited, and the subpoena is enforceable. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.D.C.: BOP employee had no REP in BOP owned work cell phone even though personal information was on it

FL2: Using an antennae to steal wifi that the police traced back didn’t violate a REP

Police obtained information that child pornography was downloaded via an IP address. They searched the computers there, finding none. They investigated further and found defendant was a neighbor who was using a Yagi antennae to obtain radio access to the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on FL2: Using an antennae to steal wifi that the police traced back didn’t violate a REP

CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

The odor of marijuana coming from defendant’s hotel room was reasonable suspicion for his later stop and frisk in the hallway. “Appellant’s brief could also be read to assert that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to patrol the motel hallway. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

Collins doesn’t provide a heightened expectation of privacy in a multi-family parking lot. “Jones does not dispute that the Dodge Magnum was inherently mobile. … We hold that the officers had probable cause to search the Dodge Magnum and that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

PA: Information from CI’s recording in the home not suppressible even though full conversation might be

Recordings made in defendant’s house were not relied upon in issuing the search warrant for his house, so they can’t be a basis of suppression under the wiretap statute. As a Fourth Amendment matter, under Hoffa, the recordings made inside … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: Information from CI’s recording in the home not suppressible even though full conversation might be

D.Idaho: Consent irrelevant to a parole search

Defendant was reasonably subjected to a parole search, and withdrawal of his consent was irrelevant. United States v. Perales, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99191 (D. Idaho June 11, 2018). The officer had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for being a … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Consent irrelevant to a parole search

D.Ariz.: Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his REP

Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his reasonable expectation of privacy where the average person couldn’t see over the fence merely walking by. The court differentiates the flyover cases because long-term video surveillance is unusual … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his REP

MN: 4A claim can’t be brought for first time in post-conviction proceeding

Defendant’s post-conviction claim that the search violated the Fourth Amendment was waived for post-conviction purposes because he had to file it in the trial court before his case concluded. Fox v. State, 2018 Minn. LEXIS 308 (June 13, 2018). The … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MN: 4A claim can’t be brought for first time in post-conviction proceeding

MA: Removing paint chips off a car under the automobile exception was reasonable

There was probable cause that defendant’s car was involved in a shooting such that its stop and search was reasonable under the automobile exception. That included removing paint chips from it when it had been removed to the police station. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: Removing paint chips off a car under the automobile exception was reasonable

NYTimes: Can 30,000 Cameras Help Solve Chicago’s Crime Problem?

NYTimes: Can 30,000 Cameras Help Solve Chicago’s Crime Problem? By Timothy Williams Armed with advanced gadgets and mapping, officers can get to crime scenes “in time to see the guy still shooting.” But what does it mean for residents’ privacy? … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NYTimes: Can 30,000 Cameras Help Solve Chicago’s Crime Problem?

W.D.Tex.: Stop for jaywalking in high crime area didn’t provide RS to detain to ask about drugs; removing key fob from pocket was 4A violation

Reasonable suspicion for jaywalking didn’t permit questioning about drugs just because defendant was in a high crime area. The use of defendant’s key fob in his pocket violated the Fourth Amendment, following United States v. Craddock, 841 F.3d 756, 760 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Stop for jaywalking in high crime area didn’t provide RS to detain to ask about drugs; removing key fob from pocket was 4A violation

E.D.Mich.: Def was essentially and admittedly an “innocent bystander” at the place searched and had no standing

This defendant had no standing in the condo that was searched under a search warrant. He produced nothing to show that he had any connection to the property or was a guest with a connection to the premises, even an … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def was essentially and admittedly an “innocent bystander” at the place searched and had no standing

Daily Beast: Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Just Hinted They Would End Privacy as We Know It

Daily Beast: Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Just Hinted They Would End Privacy as We Know It by Jay Michaelson: President Trump’s addition to the Supreme Court sides with the bench’s ‘originalist’—and it has terrifying implications for your rights. Because privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Daily Beast: Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Just Hinted They Would End Privacy as We Know It

SCOTUS: The driver of a rental car not on the contract may have a REP in the car

The driver of a rental car not listed on the contract may have a reasonable exception of privacy in the car Byrd v. United States, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2803 (May 14, 2018). Syllabus:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on SCOTUS: The driver of a rental car not on the contract may have a REP in the car

W.D.Tex.: Removal of def’s key fob to press the buttons to locate car was a search that violated a REP in def’s pants pocket

The removal of defendant’s key fob from his pocket to locate his car violated a reasonable expectation of privacy and required suppression of the identity of his car. United States v. Fennell, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77041 (W.D. Tex, May … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Removal of def’s key fob to press the buttons to locate car was a search that violated a REP in def’s pants pocket

NY1: REP in a bathroom with door closed but unlocked

A person in a bathroom without a lock on the door with the door shut has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Police opening the door violated that expectation. People v. Vinson, 2018 NY Slip Op 03437, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NY1: REP in a bathroom with door closed but unlocked

CA11: Interrupted residential burglary is exigency for police entry and search

“Police officers interrupt what they reasonably believe to be a residential burglary and detain two suspects just outside the house. Having done so, can the officers thereafter lawfully enter the home—without a warrant, and without further suspicion of wrongdoing—to briefly … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA11: Interrupted residential burglary is exigency for police entry and search

Or: Officers didn’t violate def’s privacy by looking under bathroom stall door to see him masturbating

Officers did not violate defendant’s privacy rights in looking under the door from 5′ away to see that he was masturbating and ordering him out. The officers’ look violated no “social norms or [did it] significantly impair defendant’s interest in … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Or: Officers didn’t violate def’s privacy by looking under bathroom stall door to see him masturbating

MO: Recording def’s conversation with attorney in police station interview room violated 6A and privilege; mandamus granted against unsealing

Defendant’s attorney met him at the police station to confer, and they put them in an interview room which recorded their meeting. The trial court appointed a special master to review it. The recording violated defendant’s attorney-client privilege and right … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on MO: Recording def’s conversation with attorney in police station interview room violated 6A and privilege; mandamus granted against unsealing

WaPo: Va. Supreme Court revives challenge to police storage of license plate reader data

WaPo: Va. Supreme Court revives challenge to police storage of license plate reader data by Tom Jackman:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Va. Supreme Court revives challenge to police storage of license plate reader data