Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

WA: SW may be issued for mitigation evidence in death penalty case; here from def’s prison cell

A search warrant can be issued for evidence in mitigation of the death penalty. Defendant was charged with murder of a prison guard, and it was information in his prison cell of books, documents, and medical reports. The state law … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on WA: SW may be issued for mitigation evidence in death penalty case; here from def’s prison cell

CA6: Marital privilege doesn’t apply to a recorded jail call

Marital privilege doesn’t apply to jail telephone calls defendant knew would be recorded because of the lack of a confidential communication. United States v. Ayala, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 31345 (6th Cir. Nov. 6, 2018). The Pennsylvania Wiretap Act is … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on CA6: Marital privilege doesn’t apply to a recorded jail call

OH8: State had to argue plain view to trial court to argue it on appeal

The state’s plain view argument wasn’t pressed in the trial court, so it can’t be a basis for appeal. Even on the merits, the state loses because the stop was invalid, and the detention unreasonable all before the alleged plain … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on OH8: State had to argue plain view to trial court to argue it on appeal

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a wiretapped contraband cell phone in a jail

Defendant was on a contraband cell phone in jail that was wiretapped. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in that phone. United States v. Nava, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155590 (N.D. Ga. Sep. 12, 2018):

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a wiretapped contraband cell phone in a jail

LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail

LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail by Hannah Fry:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: ‘Technical error’ blamed for recordings of more than 1,000 attorney-inmate phone calls in O.C. jail

LA Times: Editorial: Bugging conversations between criminal defendants and their lawyers is bad news

LA Times: Editorial: Bugging conversations between criminal defendants and their lawyers is bad news: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and under various court rulings that means government agents must first get warrants before listening in on … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: Editorial: Bugging conversations between criminal defendants and their lawyers is bad news

ID: Cell seizure of def’s notes for conversation with defense lawyer presumptively prejudicial; remanded to see if state can overcome prejudice and whether DA disqualified

Defendant was convicted of attempted murder. “While he was incarcerated prior to trial, Robins’s cell was searched and handwritten notes he had prepared in anticipation of a meeting with counsel were seized and delivered to the prosecuting attorney. The district … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on ID: Cell seizure of def’s notes for conversation with defense lawyer presumptively prejudicial; remanded to see if state can overcome prejudice and whether DA disqualified

LA Times: Authorities recorded privileged attorney-client conversations, district attorney’s office says

LA Times: Authorities recorded privileged attorney-client conversations, district attorney’s office says by Nina Agrawal:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on LA Times: Authorities recorded privileged attorney-client conversations, district attorney’s office says

MS: No REP in calls from police station

Defendant’s calls from the police station after he was arrested admitted the marijuana in this case was his. The calls were admitted at trial, defense counsel challenging authentication. Defendant pro se argued a Fourth Amendment violation, but that is defaulted … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MS: No REP in calls from police station

CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

The odor of marijuana coming from defendant’s hotel room was reasonable suspicion for his later stop and frisk in the hallway. “Appellant’s brief could also be read to assert that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to patrol the motel hallway. … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: No REP from police being in a hotel hallway and then having RS for a frisk

MN: 4A claim can’t be brought for first time in post-conviction proceeding

Defendant’s post-conviction claim that the search violated the Fourth Amendment was waived for post-conviction purposes because he had to file it in the trial court before his case concluded. Fox v. State, 2018 Minn. LEXIS 308 (June 13, 2018). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MN: 4A claim can’t be brought for first time in post-conviction proceeding

MotherJones: A Private Prison Company Gave 1,300 Recordings of Confidential Inmate Phone Calls to Prosecutors

MotherJones: A Private Prison Company Gave 1,300 Recordings of Confidential Inmate Phone Calls to Prosecutors by Tonya Riley: Kansas’ US Attorney’s Office has admitted listening to opposing lawyers’ conversations. Securus, the company responsible for recording the calls, has already faced … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on MotherJones: A Private Prison Company Gave 1,300 Recordings of Confidential Inmate Phone Calls to Prosecutors

NYTimes: Calling Your Lawyer’s Cell From Jail? What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.

NYTimes: Calling Your Lawyer’s Cell From Jail? What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You. by Richard A. Oppel Jr.: Most people assume that a conversation with their lawyer will remain confidential. But if the conversation takes place … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Calling Your Lawyer’s Cell From Jail? What You Say Can and Will Be Used Against You.

PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were completely wrong. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy concerning his jail calls made over a television monitor and through a computer system. This was a case of consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails

NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails by Jan Ransom:

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYTimes: Women Describe Invasive Strip Searches on Visits to City Jails

NY3: Forced prison body cavity search was unreasonable

Defendant’s forced body cavity search in prison was unreasonable under all the circumstances. People v. Holton, 2018 NY Slip Op 02836, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2830 (3d Dist. Apr. 26, 2018):

Posted in Body searches, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY3: Forced prison body cavity search was unreasonable

NH: Warrantless DNA testing of blood obtained from hospital if error was harmless

Defendant was driving in a car crash that critically injured him and his passenger. He came to the ER, and the hospital drew five vials of blood for diagnostic testing for his condition. At the hearing all that it would … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NH: Warrantless DNA testing of blood obtained from hospital if error was harmless

E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

Suit over opening of non-legal mail, here medical records, was frivolous. Villafana v. Clarke, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54893 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2018). The first officer at the scene conducted a search without probable cause. A supervising officer appeared … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Suit over opening medical records envelope as non-legal mail was frivolous

CA5: Holding DL doesn’t make request for consent coercive; record unclear on how long dispatch took to get back

Retention of identification documents when asking for consent does not ipso facto make the request coercive. The record is unclear on how long it took for computer checks to be complete, too. United States v. Perales, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Holding DL doesn’t make request for consent coercive; record unclear on how long dispatch took to get back

E.D.Cal.: Prison inmate states 4A claim for digital rectal search in front of other inmates

Plaintiff prison inmate states a claim for a digital search in front of other inmates. Fuentes v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52132 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018). The prison strip search here had a legitimate penological … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Body searches, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Prison inmate states 4A claim for digital rectal search in front of other inmates