Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

S.D.Ill.: No 4A claim for prison lockdown and shakedown for drugs

There is no Fourth Amendment claim available to an inmate at USP Marion for prison wide shakedowns for two days after drugs came in and the prison went into lockdown. Kammeyer v. True, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107060 (S.D. Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: No 4A claim for prison lockdown and shakedown for drugs

NY1: Search incident of a “booster bag” at time of arrest outside a store was reasonable

Defendants were involved in store thefts with a “booster bag” where they were going into the stores and making off with stuff in bag and then transferring it to a rolling suitcase on the street. When the police observed a … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on NY1: Search incident of a “booster bag” at time of arrest outside a store was reasonable

E.D.Cal.: There’s no REP in the cell or room of the state’s mental hospital

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the cell or room of person under civil commitment. It’s not a jail and there are limited constitutional protections inside. Leonard v. Coalinga State Hosp., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88170 (E.D. Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: There’s no REP in the cell or room of the state’s mental hospital

CA9: Recording pretrial detention inmates’ conversations for witness safety was reasonable

While defendants were in pretrial detention on a RICO indictment, the government apparently surreptitiously recorded conversations between them because there were legitimate witness safety concerns. The court finds no reasonable expectation of privacy in that situation. United States v. Ross, … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA9: Recording pretrial detention inmates’ conversations for witness safety was reasonable

DE: Jail cell seizure of trial and A-C privileged materials requires disqualification of entire prosecution team; dismissal order reversed

Prosecutors ordered a prison cell search of a murder defendant’s cell, and legal materials and trial strategy materials were seized. It started with a search to see if a protective order was violated, but it ended up being quite broad. … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on DE: Jail cell seizure of trial and A-C privileged materials requires disqualification of entire prosecution team; dismissal order reversed

NYLJ: Queens Attorney Convicted in Scheme to Reduce Client’s Prison Sentence

NYLJ: Queens Attorney Convicted in Scheme to Reduce Client’s Prison Sentence by Dan M. Clark. A call was recorded between the defendant defense lawyer and the client calling on a smuggled cell phone from jail.

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NYLJ: Queens Attorney Convicted in Scheme to Reduce Client’s Prison Sentence

S.D.N.Y.: A prison cell search doesn’t need justification

“‘[P]rison officials are presumed to do their best to evaluate and monitor objectively the security needs of the institution and the inmates in their custody, and then to determine whether and when such concerns necessitate a search of a prison … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: A prison cell search doesn’t need justification

NY2: Jail call here was more prejudicial than relevant and should have been excluded

Admission of defendant’s jail call here was more prejudicial than relevant because it omitted context. The jury was at a loss as to what arrest was being talked about. People v. Robinson, 2019 NY Slip Op 01799, 2019 N.Y. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY2: Jail call here was more prejudicial than relevant and should have been excluded

D.Ore.: Seizing house title records from house officers already had copies of wasn’t overbroad; it shows control

The search warrant was not overbroad because officers seized title records on the property that they already apparently had copies of. It shows control. United States v. Cramer, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34959 (D. Ore. Mar. 5, 2019). There is … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Seizing house title records from house officers already had copies of wasn’t overbroad; it shows control

NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

No Fourth Amendment right of defendant was violated by recording his prison calls and then admitting them into evidence. He was well on notice that they were recorded. People v. Diaz, 2019 NY Slip Op 01260, 2019 N.Y. LEXIS 266 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: No REP or 4A right against recording of calls from prison

OH7: Def’s one phone call from station house was on a recorded phone with a sign it was; no REP

Defendant was just arrested, and he was given his one phone call before going to jail. The call was recorded, and the sign on the wall said it was. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the call. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH7: Def’s one phone call from station house was on a recorded phone with a sign it was; no REP

CA7: QI barred § 1983 over forced prison blood draw

Plaintiff is an inmate in prison who was ordered to give a blood test when prison officials decided he wasn’t acting right and might be high. His suit over the prison’s forced blood draw is barred by qualified immunity. Holm … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: QI barred § 1983 over forced prison blood draw

N.D.Ga.: Clothing as evidence in plain view can be seized whether from a suspect or victim

Defendant’s clothing was properly seized under the plain view doctrine whether he was a suspect or a victim. Defendant also didn’t have standing in the car involved because it wasn’t his. United States v. Hood, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5357 … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Clothing as evidence in plain view can be seized whether from a suspect or victim

E.D.Cal.: Camping in a nonapproved area of Yosemite National Park was a reasonable suspicion

Camping in a nonapproved area of Yosemite National Park after a warning not to was reasonable suspicion for a stop. United States v. Ontiveros, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2791 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2019).* Defendant over time filed five motions … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Camping in a nonapproved area of Yosemite National Park was a reasonable suspicion

Why they strip search in jail: WGNO: Police find gun concealed in buttocks of Lafourche Parish man

WGNO: Police find gun concealed in buttocks of Lafourche Parish man: GOLDEN MEADOW, LA – Deputies at the Lafourche Parish Jail found a gun concealed in the buttocks of a man arrested after police found a “zip gun” and homemade … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on Why they strip search in jail: WGNO: Police find gun concealed in buttocks of Lafourche Parish man

N.D.Ga.: When jail calls are a part of the PC for a SW affidavit, transcripts aren’t required

“Dubose raises a slew of arguments [not a good sign] in support of her contention that the affidavit fails to establish probable cause to search the iPhone; however, none of those arguments has merit.” There was an argument that a … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: When jail calls are a part of the PC for a SW affidavit, transcripts aren’t required

S.D.Ga.: No standing in a wiretapped contraband cell phone in prison

Defendant’s calls on a contraband cell phone in jail were wiretapped. He doesn’t even have standing because the phone was unlawful. “The cases concerning the precise question at issue—a prisoner’s ability to challenge the introduction of intercepted communications from his … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: No standing in a wiretapped contraband cell phone in prison

Cal.: Jailhouse writings could be seized with SW to prove def’s competence at trial

A search warrant was executed on defendant’s jail cell on the eve of trial and produced writings that refuted defendant’s claim of incompetence to understand the proceedings. They were admissible. People v. Buenrostro, 2018 Cal. LEXIS 9384 (Dec. 3, 2018).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on Cal.: Jailhouse writings could be seized with SW to prove def’s competence at trial

ID: Seizure of A-C materials from def’s jail cell violated privilege; remanded for remedy and possible recusal of DA

The state searched defendant’s jail cell while he was in pretrial detention and seized attorney-client privileged information. The state has the burden of proving that it did not affect the case against him, and the case is remanded for further … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on ID: Seizure of A-C materials from def’s jail cell violated privilege; remanded for remedy and possible recusal of DA

LA3: No REP in a jail call to spouse

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a jail call to defendant’s wife. State v. Ducote, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 2297 (La. App. 3 Cir. Nov. 15, 2018).* No reasonable suspicion for extending a stop for no proof of … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: No REP in a jail call to spouse