Category Archives: Good faith exception

N-M Ct.Crim.App.: Lack of CO’s actual authority to issue search authorization fatal to search; no GFE

The Court Martial judge erred in concluding that a particular major had authority to authorize searches of appellant’s body, office, and personal property because she was not a “commander” for the purposes of Mil. R. Evid. 315 even though her … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on N-M Ct.Crim.App.: Lack of CO’s actual authority to issue search authorization fatal to search; no GFE

OK: State blood draw statute was suspect, but GFE applies

The state blood draw is constitutionally suspect, but the court doesn’t have to go there. The officer’s actions in relying on it was still good faith. Stewart v. State, 2019 OK CR 6, 2019 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (May … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OK: State blood draw statute was suspect, but GFE applies

M.D.Fla.: CSLI order 3½ months before Carpenter was valid under GFE; officers not expected to know what SCOTUS will do

CSLI order issued 3½ months before Carpenter was valid under good faith exception. Officers were not expected to know what SCOTUS would do. United States v. Turner, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81011 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: CSLI order 3½ months before Carpenter was valid under GFE; officers not expected to know what SCOTUS will do

N.D.Tex.: Nexus & GFE: Officer’s experience drug dealers keep stuff at home alone is not enough; some fact connecting home required

Officer’s experience alone that drugs and paraphernalia are often kept at the alleged dealer’s home does not satisfy the good faith exception. There must also be some facts connecting the house to the drug offense away from the home. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Nexus & GFE: Officer’s experience drug dealers keep stuff at home alone is not enough; some fact connecting home required

W.D.Ky.: Complete failure of nexus was no PC and even GFE won’t save it

The affidavit for search warrant here fails to show nexus to defendant’s property. Moreover, it can’t even be inferred from the CI’s statements. “The affidavit presently before this Court offers no such supplemental information. The affidavit does not describe a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Complete failure of nexus was no PC and even GFE won’t save it

D.Minn.: No nexus whatsoever between offense and evidence sought and place to be searched; therefore, no GFE

There was no nexus shown at all between the affidavit for the search warrant between the evidence sought and the place to be searched. The good faith exception doesn’t rescue the search here because the affidavit is, in fact, so … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No nexus whatsoever between offense and evidence sought and place to be searched; therefore, no GFE

IL: Kentucky officers investigated aggravated DUI with an accident on Ohio River bridge; remanded for findings of GFE

Defendant was involved in an accident on the Brookport Bridge between Illinois and Kentucky, and he was originally charged in Kentucky. On closer examination, the accident was determined to be in Illinois, so that case was dismissed, and it was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Kentucky officers investigated aggravated DUI with an accident on Ohio River bridge; remanded for findings of GFE

W.D.N.Y.: State SW issued for violation of state statute under federal injunction since 1997 should be suppressed

Defendant was federally indicted for possession of child pornography after a state search warrant for violation of state law. There was, however, a federal injunction from 1997 prohibiting prosecutions under a particular New York statute, but at least 11 people … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: State SW issued for violation of state statute under federal injunction since 1997 should be suppressed

E.D.Va.: The potentially overbroad SW was narrowed by listing the crime under investigation

The search warrant was challenged as a general warrant, but the court finds that it specified the crime under investigation, and that limited it. “Although the specific electronics recovered were not part of [one] burglary, those devices were nevertheless well … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: The potentially overbroad SW was narrowed by listing the crime under investigation

N.D.Cal.: Strickland prejudice is subject to harmless error review

The state court post-conviction resolution of this case under § 2254 review was not unreasonable. Even if defense counsel had moved for suppression of evidence he’d stipulated to, the outcome wouldn’t have changed because of the overwhelming other evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Strickland prejudice is subject to harmless error review

CAAF: Military GFE satisfied here; three military lawyers also asked about PC

In applying the military good faith exception under M.R.E. 311(c)(3), the court finds the NMCCA properly applied the exception which, under rule, blends into probable cause. There clearly was a substantial basis for finding probable cause, and good faith was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches | Comments Off on CAAF: Military GFE satisfied here; three military lawyers also asked about PC

CA9: SW was ambiguous as to the mobile home to be searched; no PC shown as to one searched; suppressed

The search warrant authorized search of a gray mobile home. There were two on the property, and the one searched was white. The search warrant was thus ambiguous when the officers arrived, and the court finds the search unjustified because … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: SW was ambiguous as to the mobile home to be searched; no PC shown as to one searched; suppressed

CA5, 1 & 10: Even if the Playpen SW was void ab initio, that does not mean the GFE would not apply

Even if, arguendo, the NIT warrant issued in the E.D.Va. was void ab initio for violating Rule 41, that does not mean that the good faith exception cannot apply. The court concludes that it does. United States v. Ganzer, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5, 1 & 10: Even if the Playpen SW was void ab initio, that does not mean the GFE would not apply

E.D.N.C.: Body camera corroborated RS for frisk

“Body camera footage corroborated the detectives’ testimony that the circumstances reasonably suggested Defendant may have been armed and that a pat-down search was needed to ensure officer safety. …. When faced with an uncooperative and seemingly agitated individual suspected of … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Body camera corroborated RS for frisk

WY: New facts after the stop not required if there was RS all along

New facts after the stop are not required to extend the stop, as long as there is reasonable suspicion with the stop. Brown v. State, 2019 WY 42, 2019 Wyo. LEXIS 44 (Apr. 19, 2019). Pre-Carpenter obtaining of CSLI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: New facts after the stop not required if there was RS all along

Collins v. Virginia on remand: GFE saves the search

Collins v. Virginia on remand: The good faith exception applies to sustain the search because no reasonably well trained officer would have known that automobile exception would apply on the curtilage in the garage. Collins v. Commonwealth, 2019 Va. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Collins v. Virginia on remand: GFE saves the search

LA5: CSLI obtained by subpoena 16 months before Carpenter subject to GFE

The state obtained defendant’s CSLI 16 months before Carpenter with a subpoena duces tecum. Under the Davis v. United States good faith exception, the exclusionary rule should not apply. State v. Davis, 2019 La. App. LEXIS 627 (La. App. 5 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on LA5: CSLI obtained by subpoena 16 months before Carpenter subject to GFE

CA5: Typo on an IP address in affidavit for SW that nobody noticed doesn’t void the search; GFE applies

A typographical error in an IP address in the affidavit for search warrant was overlooked by everybody, and it was reasonable for the police to still rely on it under the good faith exception. United States v. Gonzalez, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: Typo on an IP address in affidavit for SW that nobody noticed doesn’t void the search; GFE applies

WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

The exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions under 1958 Plymouth Sedan; however, the state gets to argue and develop a record on remand that the good faith exception applies. State v. Scott, 2019 Wisc. App. LEXIS 191 (Apr. 4, 2019). … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

There were factual mistakes in the affidavit for search warrant, but it doesn’t undermine the probable cause showing. In any event, the mistakes are in good faith and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Naum, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies