Category Archives: Good faith exception

DE: Slim inference for nexus wasn’t enough, and exclusionary rule applies

The affidavit for the search warrant creates only a slim inference at best, and no facts at all, showing a nexus to the place to be searched and the fraud crime under investigation. Therefore, the search warrant lacks probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Slim inference for nexus wasn’t enough, and exclusionary rule applies

N.D.Ga.: Even if SW was not particular enough, it wasn’t so defective or obvious that the GFE should not apply

Even if the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was overbroad, which isn’t even decided, it was not so overbroad that the good faith exception to the exclusionary should be applied. United States v. Obie, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216350 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Even if SW was not particular enough, it wasn’t so defective or obvious that the GFE should not apply

D.V.I.: GFE applies to searches before the court held U.S. to V.I. packages weren’t border searches

Applying its prior Baxter case, the District of the Virgin Islands holds that the border search exception doesn’t apply to mail and packages shipped from the Continental U.S. The searches here, however, predated Baxter, so the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.V.I.: GFE applies to searches before the court held U.S. to V.I. packages weren’t border searches

N.D.Ga.: False positives by drug dog don’t necessarily undermine PC for SW; GFE can still apply

The fact a drug dog has alleged false positives (i.e., hits on things but no drugs found) does not mean that a dog alert that led to a search warrant still cannot be relied upon in good faith. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: False positives by drug dog don’t necessarily undermine PC for SW; GFE can still apply

N.D.Iowa: Govt overcame presumptively unreasonable search finding a bullet hole to validate SW for premises

Defendant showed that filing his motion to suppress nearly a year late under the motions deadline was with good cause because of continuances of the trial and changes in counsel. A bullet hole in a hallway wall was discovered by … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Govt overcame presumptively unreasonable search finding a bullet hole to validate SW for premises

N.D.Iowa: Pre-warrant thought process of police relevant to GFE

The good faith exception saved this apparent warrantless search that led to a search warrant. The government gets to explore the officer’s thought process leading to the warrant after an apparent warrantless search led to discovery of a bullet hole … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Pre-warrant thought process of police relevant to GFE

E.D.Wis.: Cert grant alone in Carpenter didn’t nullify GFE as to CSLI

The fact that SCOTUS had granted cert in Carpenter when the CSLI was obtained under a § 2703 order and not a search warrant doesn’t make government reliance on existing precedent unreasonable or show a lack good faith. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Cert grant alone in Carpenter didn’t nullify GFE as to CSLI

IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

It’s defendant’s burden in challenging a search warrant to raise both the defects in the warrant (such as a lack of probable cause) and inapplicability of the good faith exception. Raising the good faith exception in his reply brief is … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

Standing to contest a search and seizure issue is not jurisdictional, so the court doesn’t have to decide standing. Going to the merits, there was probable cause for the search warrant for the package arriving by mail, and the delay … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

CA6: SW’s PC doesn’t even have to be decided if affidavit falls within “heartland” of GFE

The affidavit for this search warrant could have been more detailed, but it doesn’t necessarily show it to be weak. Nevertheless, the court doesn’t even have to decide probable cause because this case falls within the “heartland” of the good … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: SW’s PC doesn’t even have to be decided if affidavit falls within “heartland” of GFE

S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

“Ward also argues that the traffic stop was extended by placing him in the back of the police cruiser. … However, the officer(s) needed to walk back to the police cruiser in order to complete the mission of issuing a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

CA4: Individualized suspicion is now required for border searches of electronic devices but it wasn’t in May 2015, so the GFE applies

Warrantless forensic searches of defendant’s devices in May of 2015 lacked the required nexus to the recognized historic rationales justifying the border search exception to the warrant requirement. Officers had probable cause to suspect that defendant had previously committed grave … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Individualized suspicion is now required for border searches of electronic devices but it wasn’t in May 2015, so the GFE applies

VA: State gets to argue GFE after a Carpenter remand even though it never raised the question before Carpenter was decided

Defendant was the subject of warrantless CSLI pre-Carpenter, and he petitioned for cert while Carpenter was pending. After Carpenter was decided, his case was GVR’d back to the state court of appeals. Reed v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 2702 (2018). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on VA: State gets to argue GFE after a Carpenter remand even though it never raised the question before Carpenter was decided

CA5: CSLI obtained prior to Carpenter was valid, and it didn’t taint CSLI obtained after Carpenter for backup

Defendant was suspected of being a serial bank robber in the Houston area, and the government obtain CSLI by an SCA § 2703(d) order without a showing of probable cause. Two months before trial, Carpenter was decided, and, that same … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: CSLI obtained prior to Carpenter was valid, and it didn’t taint CSLI obtained after Carpenter for backup

W.D.Ky.: Consent to search a vehicle includes the spare tire compartment

Defendant’s open consent to search a vehicle included the spare tire compartment because it’s known that people secrete things there. United States v. Stevens, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191954 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 29, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190842 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Consent to search a vehicle includes the spare tire compartment

E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

Defendant’s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019). The affidavit for … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

KS applies Krull for GFE to statutory DUI advice of rights later held unconstitutional

The officer gave advice of DUI rights as required by state law later held unconstitutional. Under Illinois v. Krull, the court finds the officer acted in good faith, and the BAC test is not suppressed. State v. Perkins, 2019 Kan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS applies Krull for GFE to statutory DUI advice of rights later held unconstitutional

CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

A second search warrant was issued for defendant’s cell phone. He argued lack of probable cause and the government responded. The government didn’t raise the good faith exception in the district court. The court assumes lack of probable cause and … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

Defendant was detained unreasonably without reasonable suspicion and then her car was searched for a weapon but none was found. Then the detaining officer called for a female officer to conduct a search of her person. “Because reasonable suspicion was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

E.D.N.Y.: Given a 4A violation for lack of particularity, subjective good faith isn’t good enough for GFE

There was a failure of particularity in this document search warrant, which the government effectively concedes, and it falls back to the good faith exception to save it. The court concludes, however, in a long analysis, that the deterrent benefits … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Given a 4A violation for lack of particularity, subjective good faith isn’t good enough for GFE