Category Archives: Good faith exception

E.D.Wis.: Cert grant alone in Carpenter didn’t nullify GFE as to CSLI

The fact that SCOTUS had granted cert in Carpenter when the CSLI was obtained under a § 2703 order and not a search warrant doesn’t make government reliance on existing precedent unreasonable or show a lack good faith. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Cert grant alone in Carpenter didn’t nullify GFE as to CSLI

IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

It’s defendant’s burden in challenging a search warrant to raise both the defects in the warrant (such as a lack of probable cause) and inapplicability of the good faith exception. Raising the good faith exception in his reply brief is … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IN: Def’s raising GFE for first time in reply brief is waiver

D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

Standing to contest a search and seizure issue is not jurisdictional, so the court doesn’t have to decide standing. Going to the merits, there was probable cause for the search warrant for the package arriving by mail, and the delay … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Guam: 4A standing is not jurisdictional, so the court can go to GFE without deciding PC

CA6: SW’s PC doesn’t even have to be decided if affidavit falls within “heartland” of GFE

The affidavit for this search warrant could have been more detailed, but it doesn’t necessarily show it to be weak. Nevertheless, the court doesn’t even have to decide probable cause because this case falls within the “heartland” of the good … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: SW’s PC doesn’t even have to be decided if affidavit falls within “heartland” of GFE

S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

“Ward also argues that the traffic stop was extended by placing him in the back of the police cruiser. … However, the officer(s) needed to walk back to the police cruiser in order to complete the mission of issuing a … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Putting def in the back seat of a police car wasn’t unreasonable during a basic traffic stop

CA4: Individualized suspicion is now required for border searches of electronic devices but it wasn’t in May 2015, so the GFE applies

Warrantless forensic searches of defendant’s devices in May of 2015 lacked the required nexus to the recognized historic rationales justifying the border search exception to the warrant requirement. Officers had probable cause to suspect that defendant had previously committed grave … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Individualized suspicion is now required for border searches of electronic devices but it wasn’t in May 2015, so the GFE applies

VA: State gets to argue GFE after a Carpenter remand even though it never raised the question before Carpenter was decided

Defendant was the subject of warrantless CSLI pre-Carpenter, and he petitioned for cert while Carpenter was pending. After Carpenter was decided, his case was GVR’d back to the state court of appeals. Reed v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 2702 (2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on VA: State gets to argue GFE after a Carpenter remand even though it never raised the question before Carpenter was decided

CA5: CSLI obtained prior to Carpenter was valid, and it didn’t taint CSLI obtained after Carpenter for backup

Defendant was suspected of being a serial bank robber in the Houston area, and the government obtain CSLI by an SCA § 2703(d) order without a showing of probable cause. Two months before trial, Carpenter was decided, and, that same … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: CSLI obtained prior to Carpenter was valid, and it didn’t taint CSLI obtained after Carpenter for backup

W.D.Ky.: Consent to search a vehicle includes the spare tire compartment

Defendant’s open consent to search a vehicle included the spare tire compartment because it’s known that people secrete things there. United States v. Stevens, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191954 (W.D. Ky. Sept. 29, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190842 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Consent to search a vehicle includes the spare tire compartment

E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

Defendant’s giving a false name extended the stop and added to the reasonable suspicion to detain him after his true identity was discovered. United States v. Jackson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188225 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 30, 2019). The affidavit for … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s giving false name justifies extending stop

KS applies Krull for GFE to statutory DUI advice of rights later held unconstitutional

The officer gave advice of DUI rights as required by state law later held unconstitutional. Under Illinois v. Krull, the court finds the officer acted in good faith, and the BAC test is not suppressed. State v. Perkins, 2019 Kan. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS applies Krull for GFE to statutory DUI advice of rights later held unconstitutional

CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

A second search warrant was issued for defendant’s cell phone. He argued lack of probable cause and the government responded. The government didn’t raise the good faith exception in the district court. The court assumes lack of probable cause and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA2 applies GFE even though not litigated below because the findings on PC show it

LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

Defendant was detained unreasonably without reasonable suspicion and then her car was searched for a weapon but none was found. Then the detaining officer called for a female officer to conduct a search of her person. “Because reasonable suspicion was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA: Two Rodriguez violations: car searched for weapon without RS then female officer called for a body search

E.D.N.Y.: Given a 4A violation for lack of particularity, subjective good faith isn’t good enough for GFE

There was a failure of particularity in this document search warrant, which the government effectively concedes, and it falls back to the good faith exception to save it. The court concludes, however, in a long analysis, that the deterrent benefits … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Given a 4A violation for lack of particularity, subjective good faith isn’t good enough for GFE

E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

Knowing that defendant and his confederates talked about drug transactions on Facebook messenger, the limited search warrant for that was based on probable cause, and a message was recovered referring to acquiring a “ball” and it was almost certainly an … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ten months of Facebook seizure was way overbroad, but the govt gets the benefit of the GFE

E.D.Wis.: The affidavit lacked PC and didn’t connect def’s van to the crime, but the GFE applies anyway

The affidavit lacked probable cause and didn’t connect defendant’s van to the crime. Yet, it wasn’t so bad that the good faith exception couldn’t apply. [Seems like it should not have applied.] United States v. Burgess, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: The affidavit lacked PC and didn’t connect def’s van to the crime, but the GFE applies anyway

CA6: Ptf stated a 4A claim and overcame QI for the officer’s allegedly manufacturing case against him

Plaintiff produced enough evidence to show defendant officer falsified the case against him and overcame qualified immunity. The prosecutor dropped the criminal case when it was apparent it was bogus, and then plaintiff sued. Parnell v. City of Detroit, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf stated a 4A claim and overcame QI for the officer’s allegedly manufacturing case against him

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW was “bare bones” so no GFE; Brandeis quoted

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s home proved to be “bare bones” and showed no probable cause or nexus to crime whatsoever. Accordingly, the good faith exception doesn’t even apply. The court cites Brandeis’s 1928 Olmstead dissent. United … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit for SW was “bare bones” so no GFE; Brandeis quoted

E.D.Va.: While the “four corners” rule is the standard for evaluating probable cause, the court may go outside the four corners in applying GFE

While the “four corners” rule is the standard for evaluating probable cause, the court may go outside the four corners in applying the good faith exception. Here, the officer had additional information he didn’t include because he’d reasonably thought he’d … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: While the “four corners” rule is the standard for evaluating probable cause, the court may go outside the four corners in applying GFE

W.D.Pa.: Retaining new counsel and attempting to reopen suppression hearing under guise of IAC claim rejected

Defendant retained new counsel and moved to reopen his suppression hearing alleging former counsel was ineffective for not raising a better argument. The motion is denied because this claim doesn’t satisfy the standard for reopening. The issue was available and … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Retaining new counsel and attempting to reopen suppression hearing under guise of IAC claim rejected