CA6: Where affidavit for SW referenced defendant’s arrests it was true: no duty to investigate how they came out

In the PC showing for a search warrant, the affiant doesn’t have to investigate every arrest of the defendant shown in a records check to determine outcomes that there was no convictions. The affiant didn’t assert convictions. At the suppression hearing, the court questioned counsel as to the accuracy of the arrest reports and it was accurate. Defendant also failed to show any false material misrepresentations in the affidavit otherwise, and there was probable cause for the search warrant. United States v. Pate, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22417 (6th Cir. Dec. 14, 2016).

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Where affidavit for SW referenced defendant’s arrests it was true: no duty to investigate how they came out

CA6: Ptf consented to inspections as a condition of licensing her group child care home

Plaintiff ran a group child care home, and twice before state officials came to inspect to see if she had violated the terms of her license. To get licensed in Michigan, one consents to administrative searches: “In order to permit proper determination of conformity with the rules, I give permission to the Michigan Department of Human Services to make a necessary and reasonable investigation of activities and standards of care, and to make an onsite inspection of my facility and services.” During the inspection at issue, they found a locked door and children hiding behind it. Plaintiff’s complaint referenced her contract, and the contract mentioned searches as a condition of licensing. In context, the consent covered the whole home, and it was valid. Even if not, the DHS officials get qualified immunity for forcing their way into the locked room. Hall v. Sweet, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22428 (6th Cir. Dec. 16, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf consented to inspections as a condition of licensing her group child care home

UT: Discovery order for DNA taking based on showing of PC was valid way to get it

Defendant was accused of burglary and aggravated assault, but he could not be identified by his victims. The state applied for a DNA collection order via the discovery rules, and defendant said he would not comply. Then an order was entered to take it by force if necessary. Defendant acceded and it was taken without force. His agreeing to take it without force was not consent. The discovery rule permits body evidence “subject to constitutional limitations,” and there was a showing of probable cause for this taking. State v. White, 2016 UT App 241, 2016 Utah App. LEXIS 253 (Dec. 15, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, DNA | Comments Off on UT: Discovery order for DNA taking based on showing of PC was valid way to get it

New law review article: Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment,

Clark D. Cunningham, Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment, 126 Yale L.J. Forum ___ (2016). Abstract:

This essay provides a concise history of events prior to the Revolutionary War that led to the adoption of the Fourth Amendment and relates that history to current controversies over the use of search warrants to obtain electronically stored information from cell phones and email accounts in the cloud, in particularly the FBI’s attempt to get court orders forcing Apple to create and give to the government software eliminating the user privacy and security features of the iPhone and the pending Microsoft lawsuit against the Department of Justice challenging email search gag orders.

Compelling comparisons are drawn between the infamous Lord Halifax general warrants used in 1763 to seize all of a suspect’s private papers and search them for evidence of seditious libel and warrants currently used by the federal government to seize the entire contents of a cell phone or of a cloud account and then conduct review of every item of digital data.

The essay concludes with legislative proposals to extend existing statutory safeguards for wiretapping and electronic surveillance to search warrants for electronically stored information, and provide notice and a right to a hearing before such warrants are executed.

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New law review article: Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment,

Seattle Times: Oregon study finds racial disparities in drug convictions

Seattle Times: Oregon study finds racial disparities in drug convictions by AP:

That conviction disparity held true in methamphetamine, heroin and cocaine cases statewide, according to a study by the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Seattle Times: Oregon study finds racial disparities in drug convictions

CATO at Liberty Blog: 84% of Americans Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture

CATO at Liberty Blog: 84% of Americans Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture by Emily Ekins:

Eighty-four percent (84%) of Americans oppose civil asset forfeiture–police ‘taking a person’s money or property that is suspected to have been involved in a drug crime before the person is convicted of a crime,’ according to a new Cato Institute/YouGov survey of 2,000 Americans. Only 16% think police ought to be allowed to seize property before a person is convicted.

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on CATO at Liberty Blog: 84% of Americans Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture

LA2: Even though LA doesn’t follow SCOTUS standing rules, def still had to show a privacy interest, and he didn’t have one in his murder victim’s cell phone

Defendant couldn’t challenge the search of his murder victim’s cell phone. While Louisiana doesn’t follow SCOTUS cases on standing, no privacy right of defendant was involved in her phone found at her feet when the police arrived at the crime scene. State v. Farris, 2016 La. App. LEXIS 2261 (La.App. 2 Cir. Dec. 14, 2016).

Officers surveilling a drug deal saw defendant leave in a large Ford pickup with no tailgate. They called ahead for a traffic stop, and he was stopped for speeding, 70 in a 65. Defendant couldn’t produce his insurance papers, and the officer was trying to verify whether defendant lied about being in jail before [to what end in a traffic stop?]. The DL check took seconds. The jail check was longer. In the meantime, three minutes later, a drug dog arrives at the scene and was run around the car. The defendant’s greater than normal nervousness justified the longer detention. “This Court concludes that Deputy Gonzales had probable cause to initiate a traffic stop on Howard’s vehicle and did not unreasonably delay the investigation of the traffic offense. This Court further finds that Deputy Gonzales had reasonable suspicion to detain Howard after the traffic stop until the dog alert.” United States v. Howard, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173533 (E.D.Tex. Nov. 14, 2016).*

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Even though LA doesn’t follow SCOTUS standing rules, def still had to show a privacy interest, and he didn’t have one in his murder victim’s cell phone

DE: SW for house didn’t also show nexus to include outbuilding

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a shed behind another man’s property. He’d been sleeping there for a while, and the police even listed that address on the arrest report as where he stayed. While the state Supreme Court has construed the state constitution more broadly than the Fourth Amendment, nexus isn’t one of those area. Instead, the court considers state case law and case law from other states and concludes that, when the warrant says “the building at XX street” nexus still has to be shown to the outbuilding too, and here there was none. The motion to suppress is granted. [The opinion is a thorough and thoughtful analysis of nexus to outbuildings not specified in warrants; and caution that it won’t apply in many other jurisdictions.] State v. Friend, 2016 Del. Super. LEXIS 626 (Dec. 13, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on DE: SW for house didn’t also show nexus to include outbuilding

MI: Consent to remove shoe didn’t include consent to take apart a lighter that fell out

Defendant’s consent was to remove his shoe. It did not include taking apart the lighter that fell out. Remanded to suppress. May v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 810 (Dec. 13, 2016).

Officers received a BOLO on a particular car being involved in a robbery with a description of the robbers. When he pulled over the car, the occupants matched the description. Then defendant fled. There was reasonable suspicion. Hamp v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 790 (Dec. 13, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MI: Consent to remove shoe didn’t include consent to take apart a lighter that fell out

Mississippi adopts new Rule of Criminal Procedure, search and seizure in Rule 4

In re Adoption of Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure, 2016 Miss. LEXIS 524 (Dec. 13, 2016)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Mississippi adopts new Rule of Criminal Procedure, search and seizure in Rule 4

IL: Civil discovery request to search personal computers was unreasonable; it was tenuous anything helpful would be found

Defendant was rear-ended in a car wreck, and he claimed various injuries, including cognitive impairment. The defense sought access to his work and personal computers in an effort to determine whether they could shed light on that. Under the Illinois right of privacy, including its state search and seizure provision, a civil discovery request for defendant to produce his computers for a hard drive imaging for a broad search like that was unreasonable. Carlson v. Jerousek, 2016 IL App (2d) 151248, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS 856 (Dec. 15, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on IL: Civil discovery request to search personal computers was unreasonable; it was tenuous anything helpful would be found

PA: An unannounced home visit of a probationer doesn’t require RS

Defendant was on probation, and the unannounced probation home visit resulted in a plain view of cocaine that was admissible in evidence. The home visits were provided for in the probation agreement, and they did not have to be based on reasonable suspicion. (A home visit is an inspection but not a search.) Commonwealth v. Parker, 2016 PA Super 280, 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 751 (Dec. 12, 2016).

Defendant does not allege that the officer’s [mis]conduct caused him to discard the weapon. Therefore, it’s a pure abandonment. People v. Ellis, 2016 NY Slip Op 26417, 2016 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4561 (Kings Co. Nov. 15, 2016).*

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on PA: An unannounced home visit of a probationer doesn’t require RS

Cal.4th: Failure to knock-and-announce and wait long enough was not subject to exclusionary rule

The officers’ failure to knock-and-announce (really wait long enough) before entry does not invoke the exclusionary rule under Michigan v. Hudson. People v. Byers, 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1087 (4th Dist. Dec. 14, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Failure to knock-and-announce and wait long enough was not subject to exclusionary rule

CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

Officers have no qualified immunity for an arrest for disorderly conduct that was obviously without probable cause, and no reasonable officer could have concluded otherwise. Catledge v. City of Chicago, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22118 (7th Cir. Dec. 13, 2016):
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

Three on reasonable suspicion

Flight led to reasonable suspicion. When cornered, defendant wouldn’t raise his hands. The frisk was valid. United States v. Strayhorn, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169219 (E.D.Mo. Nov. 14, 2016).*

A valid traffic stop led to smelling marijuana which led to probable cause to search the car. United States v. Leonard, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170981 (D.Minn. Oct. 25, 2016).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion which ripened to probable cause. “Given the facts and circumstances in toto, Officer Joiner had reasonable suspicion to believe the Defendant possibly fit the description of the male who had been allegedly trespassing on church property in possession of firearms, and his vehicle fit the description of the alleged trespasser’s vehicle, a green Ford Taurus. Based on the law, Officer Joiner had reasonable suspicion to believe the crime of trespassing was occurring when he stopped the Defendant. From that point, the Defendant’s alleged actions created probable cause for law enforcement officers to search the Defendant’s vehicle pursuant to the Carroll automobile exception, …” United States v. Moncrief, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168526 (N.D.Miss. Dec. 5, 2016).*

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Three on reasonable suspicion

WA: Actual owner has superior authority to consent, even over objection of bailee

The permitted user of a vehicle has a reasonable expectation of privacy in it, but the owner has paramount authority to consent and can even override the refusal of the user, a bailee, to consent. State v. Vanhollebeke, 2016 Wash. App. LEXIS 2989 (Dec. 13, 2016) (following Hardy v. Commonwealth, 17 Va. App. 677, 440 S.E.2d 434 (1994)):
Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on WA: Actual owner has superior authority to consent, even over objection of bailee

CA7: “We’re not inclined to construct a [4A] constitutional basis for [plaintiff’s] claims when she has failed to do so herself”

Plaintiff is a lawyer who attempted to report a $22M theft committed by a client learned in unprivileged information. The state ignored her. Ultimately, she was charged as an aider and abetter of the client, and acquitted at trial. She then sued over the prosecution and lost on prosecutorial immunity grounds. She also framed a Fourth Amendment claim as a malicious prosecution claim and lost that too for statute of limitations and failure to flesh it out so the court would understand it. Katz-Crank v. Haskett, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21855 (7th Cir. Dec. 8, 2016)*:
Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: “We’re not inclined to construct a [4A] constitutional basis for [plaintiff’s] claims when she has failed to do so herself”

Bill of Rights Day — 225 years ago today the Bill of Rights was ratified

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bill of Rights Day — 225 years ago today the Bill of Rights was ratified

OH5: Fire inspector’s violation of city agreement to give notice before inspections warranted his firing

Jeffries complained that he was subjected to arbitrary and invasive fire inspections, and the city agreed to give him prior notice. Lanzer, however, violated that agreement and was fired by the city. “However, as stated above, the City of Louisville had made assurances to Mr. Jeffries that he would receive prior notice before any further/additional inspections were conducted, and that did not happen. From the record it appears that Mr. Jeffries is a valued, local businessman and constituent, and that City Council terminated Appellant for breaking the promises which had been made to Mr. Jeffries. We find that such grounds are sufficient to terminate Appellant’s at-will employment.” Lanzer v. City of Louisville, 2016-Ohio-8071, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4933 (5th Dist. Dec. 5, 2016).

“Here, based on the totality of the circumstances, we find Trooper Malone had a reasonable articulable suspicion to prolong the traffic stop and require appellant to exit the vehicle so the trooper could continue her investigation into whether appellant was fit to drive or was, in fact, impaired.” Defendant, however, refused to let the officer finish the pat down when she felt a potential weapon, and he jumped in his car and fled. State v. Steed, 2016-Ohio-8088, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4946 (6th Dist. Dec. 9, 2016).*

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH5: Fire inspector’s violation of city agreement to give notice before inspections warranted his firing

IAC of a search issue can’t prevail if the search was still valid

Defendant’s 2255 fails for a lack of prejudice because defendant can’t show that he’d prevail on the motion to suppress if it had been filed. (The government also argued that the plea agreement’s waiver provisions barred the 2255 because the 2255 was ambiguous as to what was being attacked. The court went to the IAC claim anyway.) United States v. Parker, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166442 (N.D.Ill. Dec. 2, 2016).*

Defendant loses his 2255 on the consent search grounds claiming that defense counsel advised him to consent after an illegal search. The proof shows the defendant consented before that. Melter v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168966 (W.D.Pa. Dec. 7, 2016).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IAC of a search issue can’t prevail if the search was still valid