MI: Consent to remove shoe didn’t include consent to take apart a lighter that fell out

Defendant’s consent was to remove his shoe. It did not include taking apart the lighter that fell out. Remanded to suppress. May v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 810 (Dec. 13, 2016).

Officers received a BOLO on a particular car being involved in a robbery with a description of the robbers. When he pulled over the car, the occupants matched the description. Then defendant fled. There was reasonable suspicion. Hamp v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 790 (Dec. 13, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.