Monthly Archives: May 2024

CA: Avoiding the police in a high crime area isn’t RS

Defendant’s avoiding the police and not wanting to interact with them did not rise to reasonable suspicion, even in a high crime area. The officers before the trial court didn’t articulate enough to show there was reasonable suspicion here. People … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA: Avoiding the police in a high crime area isn’t RS

CA7: Jail officials holding plaintiff under a valid court order aren’t liable for not releasing him sooner after a sentencing error

Jail officials holding plaintiff under a valid court order aren’t liable for not releasing him sooner after a sentencing error. Sabo v. Erickson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 10503 (7th Cir. Apr. 30, 2024). “The record further reflects that when Officer … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Jail officials holding plaintiff under a valid court order aren’t liable for not releasing him sooner after a sentencing error

Volokh: Do Fourth Amendment Protections Change When Property Is Moved?

Volokh: Do Fourth Amendment Protections Change When Property Is Moved? by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Volokh: Do Fourth Amendment Protections Change When Property Is Moved?

M.D.Pa.: Def was neither shipper nor recipient of USPS parcel, so he had no standing in it

Defendant was neither the shipper nor recipient of a USPS parcel with drugs in it, opened six weeks after it was unclaimed. He had no standing in it. United States v. Bell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78182 (M.D. Pa. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory, Mail and packages, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def was neither shipper nor recipient of USPS parcel, so he had no standing in it

WI: Obtaining def’s DNA by ruse wasn’t an illegal search

The state got defendant to lick an envelope and hand it over as part of a ruse. His DNA matched to a cold case. That was not an unreasonable search. State v. Vannieuwenhoven, 2024 Wisc. App. LEXIS 349 (Apr. 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on WI: Obtaining def’s DNA by ruse wasn’t an illegal search

WaPo: Apple, Google and Venmo fight new U.S. plan to monitor payment apps

WaPo: Apple, Google and Venmo fight new U.S. plan to monitor payment apps by Tony Romm (“The U.S. government is weighing whether to treat Apple, Google and PayPal-owned Venmo more like banks — and regularly inspect some of their operations … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Apple, Google and Venmo fight new U.S. plan to monitor payment apps