Monthly Archives: March 2023

M.D.Pa.: SW for cash derived from drug sales was particular enough

The search warrant for U.S. currency derived from illegal drug sales was sufficiently particular as to the warrant for defendant’s house. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33429 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2023). The CSLI warrant here was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: SW for cash derived from drug sales was particular enough

Wired: Face Recognition Software Led to His Arrest. It Was Dead Wrong

Wired; Face Recognition Software Led to His Arrest. It Was Dead Wrong (“Alonzo Sawyer’s misidentification by algorithm made him a suspect for a crime police now say was committed by someone else—feeding debate over regulation.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on Wired: Face Recognition Software Led to His Arrest. It Was Dead Wrong

S.D.Tex.: USMJ approves geofence warrant for 1.01 acre of area of crime

Geofence warrant to Google was reasonable and sufficiently particular and nonintrusive. In re Search of Info. That Is Stored At Premises Controlled By Google, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33651 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2023):

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: USMJ approves geofence warrant for 1.01 acre of area of crime

CA9: Two questions about weapons in car was for officer safety and not unreasonable

Twice asking defendant during a traffic stop about weapons was not minimally burdensome and not unreasonable when defendant had prior for weapons. United States v. Taylor, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 4954 (9th Cir. Mar. 1, 2023):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Two questions about weapons in car was for officer safety and not unreasonable

DE: State failed in burden of proof on basis for stop

The state put on nothing at the suppression hearing to show that the stop was justified. Suppressed. State v. Skinner, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 96 (Feb. 10, 2023):*

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on DE: State failed in burden of proof on basis for stop

E.D.Ky.: Failure to cross-examine at trial on some contradictions from SW affidavit was not IAC

Defendant’s 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel claim in part challenged defense counsel’s failure to cross-examine over contradictions in a search warrant affidavit by the witness. The government doesn’t address this, and assuming it was defective performance, the court finds a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Failure to cross-examine at trial on some contradictions from SW affidavit was not IAC

WI: REP in apt building’s storage room def shared with another that she put the lock on

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in an apartment’s basement storage room that was shared with another but which defendant put a padlock on. State v. Eder, 2023 Wisc. App. LEXIS 207 (Feb. 28, 2023). There was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on WI: REP in apt building’s storage room def shared with another that she put the lock on

CA10: No fixed time to write the ticket under Rodriguez

The traffic stop was justified, and the district court was correct in holding what happened during the ticket writing phase didn’t deviate from the primary mission of the stop. There’s no fixed rule on the amount of time it could … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: No fixed time to write the ticket under Rodriguez

Cal.4: Without specific argument, court won’t look to SW and affidavit to make it for the appellant

Without specific argument, the court of appeals will not scour the record and the search warrant affidavit to make a party’s argument for him. Billauer v. Escobar-Eck, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 144 (4th Dist. Feb. 28, 2023) (anti-SLAPP case; not … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.4: Without specific argument, court won’t look to SW and affidavit to make it for the appellant