Monthly Archives: October 2020

DE: Lack of police experience in finding touch DNA on firearms precludes finding PC here

For probable cause to seek DNA from defendant to link him to clothing worn in a crime, the police don’t need DNA to start. The officer’s experience here that DNA has been found in the past with clothing is not … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: Lack of police experience in finding touch DNA on firearms precludes finding PC here

N.D.Ill.: “Whether the driver actually committed the violation is beside the point.” It’s whether it’s based on a reasonable belief

The dashcam video of defendant’s alleged failure to come to a full stop doesn’t contradict the officer’s testimony that defendant didn’t stop. “Whether the driver actually committed the violation is beside the point.” United States v. Sanders, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: “Whether the driver actually committed the violation is beside the point.” It’s whether it’s based on a reasonable belief

OH2: Drugs represented to be heroin in a controlled buy don’t have to be field tested to show PC

Failure to field test the purported drugs bought during a controlled buy doesn’t undermine the probable cause alleged in the search warrant. “Here, the fact that Glynn represented to the CS that the substance being purchased was heroin warranted suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Drugs represented to be heroin in a controlled buy don’t have to be field tested to show PC

D.Nev.: Officers’ good faith belief def was a wanted person justified stop and frisk

The officers’ reasonable good faith believe defendant was another wanted person justified his stop and frisk. United States v. Galindo, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182866 (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2020):

Posted in Good faith exception, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Officers’ good faith belief def was a wanted person justified stop and frisk

D.Kan.: Surreptitiously video recording a VA doctor’s exam does not violate 4A

The VA video recorded a physical exam of defendant as a part of a fraud investigation into obtaining VA benefits. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy against recording because the examiner could have reported everything in detail anyway. United … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Surreptitiously video recording a VA doctor’s exam does not violate 4A

CA6: Must ID the police tortfeasor under § 1983 or all avoid liability

Where one of three police officers struck a gratuitous blow that caused a brain injury and plaintiff couldn’t tell which one did it, they all avoid liability under § 1983. Pineda v. Hamilton County, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 31404 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: Must ID the police tortfeasor under § 1983 or all avoid liability

E.D.Cal.: “probable cause does not require the best conceivable evidence”

“In defendant’s case, he was arrested for a violation of § 4.23(a)(1), permitting a BAC test as a search incident to arrest under Birchfield. Although there is a distinction between the concentration of alcohol in the blood and the degree … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: “probable cause does not require the best conceivable evidence”

S.D.Miss.: Two gas station employees reporting suspicious car were treated as citizen informants

Reports from two gas station employees known by name and to have been robbed in the past were from citizen informants. They warned against a suspicious car. United States v. Cooper, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182012 (S.D. Miss. Oct. 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Two gas station employees reporting suspicious car were treated as citizen informants

OH1: Smell of burnt MJ with nothing more doesn’t justify search of trunk

Smell of burning marijuana with no accouterments of drug usage or delivery didn’t justify a search of the trunk. There was no smell of raw marijuana. State v. Ulmer, 2020-Ohio-4689, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3582 (1st Dist. Sept. 30, 2020):

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: Smell of burnt MJ with nothing more doesn’t justify search of trunk

N.D.Ohio: Def’s version more credible than the police version, and motion to suppress is granted

The court sides with the defense on the credibility of the witnesses that defendant’s gun wasn’t in plain view after all, and it grants the motion to suppress. Even though he has an extensive criminal history, which the government seeks … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s version more credible than the police version, and motion to suppress is granted

W.D.N.Y.: Finding a gun during an automobile exception search doesn’t mean the search should end

Having found a gun during an automobile exception search, the officers weren’t obliged to stop the search. United States v. Green, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180561 (W.D. N.Y. Sept. 30, 2020). A CI’s information was reasonable suspicion for a probation … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Finding a gun during an automobile exception search doesn’t mean the search should end

CA11: A move-on order isn’t usually a 4A violation

In terminating a consent decree involving how the City of Miami deals with homeless people, the Eleventh Circuit notes that a move-on order isn’t usually a Fourth Amendment violation. Peery v. City of Miami, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 31175 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: A move-on order isn’t usually a 4A violation

DC: PC to arrest isn’t necessarily PC to search; Terry stop evolved into PC

Probable cause to arrest is not necessarily probable cause to search. Defendant’s initial detention under Terry was justified and evolved into probable cause. “Mr. Ellison also argues that his pre-arrest detention was longer than permitted under Terry’s rationale permitting brief … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DC: PC to arrest isn’t necessarily PC to search; Terry stop evolved into PC

The Appeal: With Little Evidence, Pennsylvania State Police Seized $600,000 From Drivers

The Appeal: With Little Evidence, Pennsylvania State Police Seized $600,000 From Drivers (“An investigation by The Appeal and Spotlight PA found that troopers in three counties have taken big money from drivers, many of whom were never charged.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on The Appeal: With Little Evidence, Pennsylvania State Police Seized $600,000 From Drivers