Daily Archives: October 9, 2020

CA5: Failure to plead facts in motion to suppress that would justify relief doesn’t require a hearing

The district court didn’t abuse its discretion in denying the motion to suppress without a hearing for failure to plead “facts that would justify relief.” United States v. Smith, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 32024 (5th Cir. Oct. 8, 2020):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA5: Failure to plead facts in motion to suppress that would justify relief doesn’t require a hearing

OH8: Stop justified by running LPN and seeing it was suspended; RS not required to check it

“Here, while Officer Mackensen had no reasonable suspicion that Long was involved in criminal activity before he checked Long’s vehicle’s license plate, he was permitted to do so pursuant to the case law authority. And, once he learned the license … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH8: Stop justified by running LPN and seeing it was suspended; RS not required to check it

S.D.Ohio: Nexus was lacking for def’s cell phone for evidence of rape, but GFE applies

“Unlike the officers in Hodson and Neuhard, however, the officers in this case were not seeking evidence of child pornography. Instead, the Detective’s affidavit sought evidence related to ‘Rape 2907.02, Gross Sexual Imposition 2907.05.’ … A commonsense review of the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Nexus was lacking for def’s cell phone for evidence of rape, but GFE applies

CA11: Anonymous 911 call with eyewitness details was RS

“Bruce insists that the officers had no reason at all to find the anonymous tip reliable, but that’s just not so. For purposes of a brief investigatory detention like the one we consider here, an anonymous 911 call giving eyewitness … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Anonymous 911 call with eyewitness details was RS

CA6: No REP in talking to a friend who was recording it

No matter how much one trusts a friend, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy that the friend won’t have recorded it and revealed it (Hoffa and White). Courser v. Mich. House of Representatives, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 31917 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in talking to a friend who was recording it

TX6: SW affidavit not admissible at trial

Defendant was prejudiced by admission of the search warrant and affidavit for it over defense objection. When defendant testified he was asked about all his porn, adult and apparent less than adult. [Why did he testify knowing that was coming?] … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX6: SW affidavit not admissible at trial

CA6: QI for workplace search of cell phone

Plaintiff is a police officer who sued over the workplace search of his cell phone (see City of Ontario v. Quon) after his wife grabbed it and turned it in claiming he was having sex with another officer. Qualified immunity … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: QI for workplace search of cell phone