Daily Archives: August 19, 2019

D.Mass.: Def was on supervised release with a reasonable searches condition, and his CP search was reasonable with that and a SW

Defendant had previously been convicted of child pornography, and he had lifetime supervision with a “reasonable” search condition. Despite that, officers got a search warrant for his house and computers for another such offense. First, there was justification for a … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def was on supervised release with a reasonable searches condition, and his CP search was reasonable with that and a SW

CA11: A late discovered search claim doesn’t support a successor 2255 petition

“Wren cannot meet the statutory criteria for filing a second or successive § 2255 motion. First, even assuming that the search warrant is ‘newly discovered’ insofar as it had been sealed, it does nothing to establish by clear and convincing … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: A late discovered search claim doesn’t support a successor 2255 petition

N.D.Ga.: Officer’s SW affidavit that said def could be ID’ed from his tattoos without seeing his face wasn’t false

Defendant was ID’ed by the police from surveillance videos, and it was a false statement that they could ID him without seeing his face. The search warrant to photograph his tattoos was issued with probable cause. United States v. Mitchell, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Officer’s SW affidavit that said def could be ID’ed from his tattoos without seeing his face wasn’t false

N.D.Ga.: Def’s removal for questioning and 8 hour detention could’t be justified under Summers

Defendant’s handcuffing and removal to the police station for interrogation could not be justified by Summers and was without probable cause. He was held eight hours and interrogated. United States v. Mitchell, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139026 (N.D. Ga. June … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def’s removal for questioning and 8 hour detention could’t be justified under Summers

SD: Def wasn’t stopped by the officer when he encountered car based on anonymous call

Police received an anonymous call that a particular van was DUI. An officer found the van parked at a gas station, parked far enough away that defendant could back out, and he walked up and asked how defendant was doing, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on SD: Def wasn’t stopped by the officer when he encountered car based on anonymous call

CA4: Def’s admission she had cocaine in her hair permitted search incident of her car where arrested

“After finding a bag of white powder in Harrison’s hair — which she admitted to the arresting officer was cocaine — and observing a suspicious baggie and a large amount of cash in plain view, the officers had a ‘reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s admission she had cocaine in her hair permitted search incident of her car where arrested

FL1: No REP in cell phone video made by victim he knew was being recorded

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a cell phone video he saw being recorded on his victim’s cell phone while he talked to her under the state wiretap law. Smiley v. State, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 12628 (Fla. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on FL1: No REP in cell phone video made by victim he knew was being recorded

Remember videos with “no guns, knives, bombs” in the request for consent?

“The State argues that, even though the sock was no longer in Peele’s possession or control, Officer James could still reasonably have feared that the sock contained ‘an explosive or incendiary device.’ Appellee’s Brief at 30. However, there is no … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Remember videos with “no guns, knives, bombs” in the request for consent?