Monthly Archives: June 2019

NBC: Facebook lawyer says ‘there is no privacy,’ hinting at the challenges of Zuckerberg’s pivot

NBC: Facebook lawyer says ‘there is no privacy,’ hinting at the challenges of Zuckerberg’s pivot by Ben Popken: Some privacy advocates remain concerned that Zuckerberg’s ‘privacy-focused vision’ leaves the company’s core business of data-targeted ads mostly unscathed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NBC: Facebook lawyer says ‘there is no privacy,’ hinting at the challenges of Zuckerberg’s pivot

S.D.N.Y.: SW for the entire contents of a cell phone isn’t per se overbroad; depends on the crime involved

“The fact that the warrant authorized law enforcement agents to access all the data on the phone does not automatically render it overbroad.” Moreover, defendant doesn’t suggest that the good faith exception does not apply. United States v. Dawkins, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW for the entire contents of a cell phone isn’t per se overbroad; depends on the crime involved

PA: Theft of a firearm isn’t exgency for warrantless search of a house

Defendant’s alleged theft of a firearm the day before was not an exigent circumstance for a warrantless entry into his home. Commonwealth v. Gray, 2019 PA Super 175, 2019 Pa. Super. LEXIS 541 (May 31, 2019). In fact, the person … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on PA: Theft of a firearm isn’t exgency for warrantless search of a house

OH6: Def doesn’t have standing to challenge search of another that led to PC for his SW

Defendant claimed that part of the facts of probable cause in the affidavit for his search warrant shouldn’t have been considered because of an illegal search of another. He doesn’t have standing to contest that search, and it can be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Standing | Comments Off on OH6: Def doesn’t have standing to challenge search of another that led to PC for his SW

CA6 (en banc): The question of PC isn’t even close, and the GFE applies

The question of probable cause isn’t even close, and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Christian, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 16322 (6th Cir. May 31, 2019) (en banc). (The dissent is concerned about use of criminal history as … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6 (en banc): The question of PC isn’t even close, and the GFE applies

N.D.Okla.: While an attachment was missing from the official SW it was at the scene of the search, so no prejudice

The government conceded that Attachment C to the mail search warrant was missing from it, and thus that it led to a potentially overbroad search. The search team, however, all had copies of Attachment C, and it was at the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: While an attachment was missing from the official SW it was at the scene of the search, so no prejudice

PA: Officer’s belief of possession of a concealed firearm is not RS for a stop and frisk

Officer’s belief of possession of a concealed firearm is not reasonable suspicion of unlawful use of a firearm. Prior case law from 1991 is disapproved. Commonwealth v. Hicks, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 3064 (May 31, 2019):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on PA: Officer’s belief of possession of a concealed firearm is not RS for a stop and frisk

CA7: § 1983 4A ptf doesn’t have to plead around qualified immunity; ptf clearly overcame it anyway

The district court erred in finding for officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff’s house. It was not her burden to plead around qualified immunity—it was the defendant’s burden to show qualified immunity. “It was clearly established in October … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: § 1983 4A ptf doesn’t have to plead around qualified immunity; ptf clearly overcame it anyway

News Maven: Cop, CPS Strip-Search Six Kids, 4-Year-Old after Mom’s 10-Minute Muffin Errand

News Maven: Cop, CPS Strip-Search Six Kids, 4-Year-Old after Mom’s 10-Minute Muffin Errand by Ben Keller: Kentucky police and CPS threatened to take a mother’s kids if she didn’t allow them in her home to strip-search them.

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on News Maven: Cop, CPS Strip-Search Six Kids, 4-Year-Old after Mom’s 10-Minute Muffin Errand

D.Mont.: PC to arrest also justifies extension of a stop

There was probable cause to arrest, and that also justified the extension of the stop. The actual arrest doesn’t have to happen during the extension. United States v. Phillips, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89962 (D. Mont. April 12, 2019), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mont.: PC to arrest also justifies extension of a stop

E.D.Ky.: Officer consulting prosecutor about SW before issuance is a factor in GFE

The officer’s consulting a prosecutor on the search warrant isn’t conclusive on good faith, but it is an important factor. United States v. Anderson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90265 (E.D. Ky. May 29, 2019). There was probable cause for the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Officer consulting prosecutor about SW before issuance is a factor in GFE

Cell phones as a “tool of the trade”?

Atlantic: The Collapsing Crime Rates of the ’90s Might Have Been Driven by Cellphones by Alexis C. Madrigal Did technology disrupt the drug game, too?

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Cell phones as a “tool of the trade”?

S.D.Ohio: A federal-state joint task force isn’t required to use a Rule 41 search warrant

A federal-state joint task force isn’t required to use a Rule 41 search warrant. United States v. Williams, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89133 (S.D. Ohio May 29, 2019). “Defendant bears the burden of showing beyond mere speculation that the disclosure … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: A federal-state joint task force isn’t required to use a Rule 41 search warrant

W.D.N.Y.: State judge’s notes of oral testimony for SW may be considered in federal court

Under the “four corners rule,” only the content of the affidavit for search warrant can be considered, but what about unrecorded oral testimony in support? New York procedural law requires the issuing magistrate who considers oral representations in further support … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: State judge’s notes of oral testimony for SW may be considered in federal court

D.S.D.: Protective sweep can occur after an arrest at the threshold

A protective sweep can occur after an arrest at the threshold even though defendant’s girlfriend said nobody else was there. United States v. Villanueva, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89450 (D. S.D. May 29, 2019). The defendant being armed when the … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Protective sweep can occur after an arrest at the threshold