Monthly Archives: December 2016

DE: Trial court couldn’t decide PC where def didn’t raise it in motion to suppress; reconsideration granted; def has to frame the issues in the motion to suppress

At issue was a seizure and then search of defendant’s cell phone with a search warrant looking for an incriminating text message that was already seen by the police on the recipient’s cell phone. At the hearing, the Superior Court … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Trial court couldn’t decide PC where def didn’t raise it in motion to suppress; reconsideration granted; def has to frame the issues in the motion to suppress

KY: There is no jurisdictional requirement for knock-and-talk

There is no such thing as a jurisdictional requirement that a law enforcement officer outside of his or her jurisdiction can’t come to one’s door to do a knock-and-talk. The officers did nothing more than any other citizen could do … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk | Comments Off on KY: There is no jurisdictional requirement for knock-and-talk

CA6: Where affidavit for SW referenced defendant’s arrests it was true: no duty to investigate how they came out

In the PC showing for a search warrant, the affiant doesn’t have to investigate every arrest of the defendant shown in a records check to determine outcomes that there was no convictions. The affiant didn’t assert convictions. At the suppression … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Where affidavit for SW referenced defendant’s arrests it was true: no duty to investigate how they came out

CA6: Ptf consented to inspections as a condition of licensing her group child care home

Plaintiff ran a group child care home, and twice before state officials came to inspect to see if she had violated the terms of her license. To get licensed in Michigan, one consents to administrative searches: “In order to permit … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf consented to inspections as a condition of licensing her group child care home

UT: Discovery order for DNA taking based on showing of PC was valid way to get it

Defendant was accused of burglary and aggravated assault, but he could not be identified by his victims. The state applied for a DNA collection order via the discovery rules, and defendant said he would not comply. Then an order was … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, DNA | Comments Off on UT: Discovery order for DNA taking based on showing of PC was valid way to get it

New law review article: Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment,

Clark D. Cunningham, Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment, 126 Yale L.J. Forum ___ (2016). Abstract: This essay provides a concise history of events prior to the Revolutionary War that led to the adoption … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New law review article: Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment,

Seattle Times: Oregon study finds racial disparities in drug convictions

Seattle Times: Oregon study finds racial disparities in drug convictions by AP: That conviction disparity held true in methamphetamine, heroin and cocaine cases statewide, according to a study by the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Seattle Times: Oregon study finds racial disparities in drug convictions

CATO at Liberty Blog: 84% of Americans Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture

CATO at Liberty Blog: 84% of Americans Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture by Emily Ekins: Eighty-four percent (84%) of Americans oppose civil asset forfeiture–police ‘taking a person’s money or property that is suspected to have been involved in a drug crime … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on CATO at Liberty Blog: 84% of Americans Oppose Civil Asset Forfeiture

LA2: Even though LA doesn’t follow SCOTUS standing rules, def still had to show a privacy interest, and he didn’t have one in his murder victim’s cell phone

Defendant couldn’t challenge the search of his murder victim’s cell phone. While Louisiana doesn’t follow SCOTUS cases on standing, no privacy right of defendant was involved in her phone found at her feet when the police arrived at the crime … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Even though LA doesn’t follow SCOTUS standing rules, def still had to show a privacy interest, and he didn’t have one in his murder victim’s cell phone

DE: SW for house didn’t also show nexus to include outbuilding

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a shed behind another man’s property. He’d been sleeping there for a while, and the police even listed that address on the arrest report as where he stayed. While the state Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on DE: SW for house didn’t also show nexus to include outbuilding

MI: Consent to remove shoe didn’t include consent to take apart a lighter that fell out

Defendant’s consent was to remove his shoe. It did not include taking apart the lighter that fell out. Remanded to suppress. May v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 810 (Dec. 13, 2016). Officers received a BOLO on a particular car … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MI: Consent to remove shoe didn’t include consent to take apart a lighter that fell out

Mississippi adopts new Rule of Criminal Procedure, search and seizure in Rule 4

In re Adoption of Mississippi Rules of Criminal Procedure, 2016 Miss. LEXIS 524 (Dec. 13, 2016)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Mississippi adopts new Rule of Criminal Procedure, search and seizure in Rule 4

IL: Civil discovery request to search personal computers was unreasonable; it was tenuous anything helpful would be found

Defendant was rear-ended in a car wreck, and he claimed various injuries, including cognitive impairment. The defense sought access to his work and personal computers in an effort to determine whether they could shed light on that. Under the Illinois … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on IL: Civil discovery request to search personal computers was unreasonable; it was tenuous anything helpful would be found

PA: An unannounced home visit of a probationer doesn’t require RS

Defendant was on probation, and the unannounced probation home visit resulted in a plain view of cocaine that was admissible in evidence. The home visits were provided for in the probation agreement, and they did not have to be based … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on PA: An unannounced home visit of a probationer doesn’t require RS

Cal.4th: Failure to knock-and-announce and wait long enough was not subject to exclusionary rule

The officers’ failure to knock-and-announce (really wait long enough) before entry does not invoke the exclusionary rule under Michigan v. Hudson. People v. Byers, 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1087 (4th Dist. Dec. 14, 2016):

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Cal.4th: Failure to knock-and-announce and wait long enough was not subject to exclusionary rule

CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

Officers have no qualified immunity for an arrest for disorderly conduct that was obviously without probable cause, and no reasonable officer could have concluded otherwise. Catledge v. City of Chicago, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22118 (7th Cir. Dec. 13, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

Three on reasonable suspicion

Flight led to reasonable suspicion. When cornered, defendant wouldn’t raise his hands. The frisk was valid. United States v. Strayhorn, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169219 (E.D.Mo. Nov. 14, 2016).* A valid traffic stop led to smelling marijuana which led to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Three on reasonable suspicion

WA: Actual owner has superior authority to consent, even over objection of bailee

The permitted user of a vehicle has a reasonable expectation of privacy in it, but the owner has paramount authority to consent and can even override the refusal of the user, a bailee, to consent. State v. Vanhollebeke, 2016 Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on WA: Actual owner has superior authority to consent, even over objection of bailee

CA7: “We’re not inclined to construct a [4A] constitutional basis for [plaintiff’s] claims when she has failed to do so herself”

Plaintiff is a lawyer who attempted to report a $22M theft committed by a client learned in unprivileged information. The state ignored her. Ultimately, she was charged as an aider and abetter of the client, and acquitted at trial. She … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: “We’re not inclined to construct a [4A] constitutional basis for [plaintiff’s] claims when she has failed to do so herself”

Bill of Rights Day — 225 years ago today the Bill of Rights was ratified

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bill of Rights Day — 225 years ago today the Bill of Rights was ratified