Daily Archives: December 18, 2016

KY: There is no jurisdictional requirement for knock-and-talk

There is no such thing as a jurisdictional requirement that a law enforcement officer outside of his or her jurisdiction can’t come to one’s door to do a knock-and-talk. The officers did nothing more than any other citizen could do … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk | Comments Off on KY: There is no jurisdictional requirement for knock-and-talk

CA6: Where affidavit for SW referenced defendant’s arrests it was true: no duty to investigate how they came out

In the PC showing for a search warrant, the affiant doesn’t have to investigate every arrest of the defendant shown in a records check to determine outcomes that there was no convictions. The affiant didn’t assert convictions. At the suppression … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Where affidavit for SW referenced defendant’s arrests it was true: no duty to investigate how they came out

CA6: Ptf consented to inspections as a condition of licensing her group child care home

Plaintiff ran a group child care home, and twice before state officials came to inspect to see if she had violated the terms of her license. To get licensed in Michigan, one consents to administrative searches: “In order to permit … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf consented to inspections as a condition of licensing her group child care home

UT: Discovery order for DNA taking based on showing of PC was valid way to get it

Defendant was accused of burglary and aggravated assault, but he could not be identified by his victims. The state applied for a DNA collection order via the discovery rules, and defendant said he would not comply. Then an order was … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, DNA | Comments Off on UT: Discovery order for DNA taking based on showing of PC was valid way to get it