Daily Archives: December 29, 2016

PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings

PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings. The court engages in a lengthy and sensitive analysis. Commonwealth v. Arter, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2916 (Dec. 28, 2016):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings

Ars Technica: Here’s what a “digital Miranda warning” might look like

Ars Technica: Here’s what a “digital Miranda warning” might look like by Cyrus Farivar: Smartphone owners need to know if—and when—they need to reveal their passcodes.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Ars Technica: Here’s what a “digital Miranda warning” might look like

New law review: Actual Expectations of Privacy, Fourth Amendment Doctrine, and the Mosaic Theory

New law review: Actual Expectations of Privacy, Fourth Amendment Doctrine, and the Mosaic Theory, by Lior Strahilevitz & Matthew B. Kugler (not online yet, if ever).

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on New law review: Actual Expectations of Privacy, Fourth Amendment Doctrine, and the Mosaic Theory

E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee to catch others in a DTO was [somehow] not unreasonable

In a really strange case, a GPS monitor to track curfew violations of a parolee was left on for 791 days. The parole officers and then other officers watched where he was going to attempt to crack a drug trafficking … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee to catch others in a DTO was [somehow] not unreasonable

D.N.M.: When neither party requests a hearing and only disputed fact isn’t material, one won’t be held

Neither party requested a hearing on the motion to suppress and one isn’t required. Here, there is one disputed fact and it isn’t material to the outcome. United States v. Benavidez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175373 (D.N.M. Dec. 19, 2016).

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on D.N.M.: When neither party requests a hearing and only disputed fact isn’t material, one won’t be held

CA8: As long as drug dog gets there before the traffic ticket is done, it’s all good

From the circuit that brought us Rodriguez, a drug dog on the scene within two minutes of a traffic stop and writing a ticket for no DL was reasonable. “Thus, there is no evidence that the dog sniff unlawfully prolonged … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on CA8: As long as drug dog gets there before the traffic ticket is done, it’s all good

LA rule permitting electronic warrant applications and issuance doesn’t violate 4A or Rule 41

The police got a search warrant from a Louisiana state judge by electronic means, but the case ended up in federal court. Louisiana’s criminal rule permitting electronic warrant applications does not violate the “oath or affirmation” requirement of the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on LA rule permitting electronic warrant applications and issuance doesn’t violate 4A or Rule 41

N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP [on reconsideration]

Surreptitious recordings outside the San Mateo courthouse of persons talking amongst themselves were entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy because they talked such that others could not overhear them except with planted recording devices. The court will conduct a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP [on reconsideration]

CA9: Def turned over cell phone by consent, but, even if not, it was searched with a warrant

Defendant handed over his telephone when it was requested [or demanded] by the police. The Fourth Amendment wasn’t violated because turning over the phone was by consent. Even if turning over the phone was nonconsensual, the cell phone was searched … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on CA9: Def turned over cell phone by consent, but, even if not, it was searched with a warrant

NYLJ.com: Electronic GPS Tracking and the Fourth Amendment

NYLJ.com: Electronic GPS Tracking and the Fourth Amendment by Martin Flumenbaum & Brad S. Karp: In their Second Circuit Review column, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp examine two decisions which appear to reflect the court’s growing interest in the … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on NYLJ.com: Electronic GPS Tracking and the Fourth Amendment

E.D.N.C.: Def’s 75 minute detention with PC before actual arrest was reasonable

Defendant was detained for 75 minutes with probable cause before her actual arrest. This was not unreasonable and didn’t circumvent McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule to have a first appearance. United States v. Morgan, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174889 (E.D.N.C. Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Def’s 75 minute detention with PC before actual arrest was reasonable