Monthly Archives: April 2016

OH9: Randolph doesn’t require target be asked for consent first

Defendant’s wife consented to the search of their house. There is no duty of the police to first ask the target of the search for consent under Randolph. The claim her consent wasn’t voluntary wasn’t in the motion to suppress … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Randolph doesn’t require target be asked for consent first

WaPo: Radley Balko’s “The Watch” Blog: Video shows white cops performing roadside cavity search of black man [quoting author]

Radley Balko’s “The Watch” Blog: Video shows white cops performing roadside cavity search of black man:

Posted in Body searches, Police misconduct | Comments Off on WaPo: Radley Balko’s “The Watch” Blog: Video shows white cops performing roadside cavity search of black man [quoting author]

WaPo: FBI ponders sharing tool to help unlock iPhone with local law agencies

WaPo: FBI ponders sharing tool to help unlock iPhone with local law agencies by Ellen Nakashima and Adam Goldman: The FBI and Justice Department are debating whether the hacking tool that helped the bureau unlock the iPhone of one of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: FBI ponders sharing tool to help unlock iPhone with local law agencies

NYTimes: Police Body Cameras: What Do You See?

NYTimes: Police Body Cameras: What Do You See? by Timothy Williams, James Thomas, Samuel Jacoby, and Damien Cave: Public frustration with policing has led to calls nationwide for more cameras worn by officers. But what do those cameras actually reveal?

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NYTimes: Police Body Cameras: What Do You See?

OH5: Entry permitted by 911 call of unresponsive person; protective sweep factually unjustified

A 911 call about an unresponsive man was justification for a warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment, but no facts justified a protective sweep once inside. Heroin in bedroom suppressed. State v. Levengood, 2016-Ohio-1340, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 1227 (5th Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH5: Entry permitted by 911 call of unresponsive person; protective sweep factually unjustified

DC Velocity: Electronic logging devices do not improve safety; mandate is unconstitutional, trucking group says

DC Velocity: Electronic logging devices do not improve safety; mandate is unconstitutional, trucking group says: OOIDA files brief asking court to overturn ELD mandate, saying it violates Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on DC Velocity: Electronic logging devices do not improve safety; mandate is unconstitutional, trucking group says

D.Neb.: Can’t prove judge issuing SW was a “rubberstamp” for the police when there was, in fact, probable cause

When arguing that the good faith exception does not apply, the “wholly abandoned his judicial role” exception needs an offer of proof. If, however, there is, in fact, probable cause, how do you prove that? You can’t. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Can’t prove judge issuing SW was a “rubberstamp” for the police when there was, in fact, probable cause

MO: Where items included in SW without PC, severance of the warrant is required, not blanket suppression

Officers checked off boxes on a search warrant form about what to search for (not a good way to present a warrant). Items 1-9 (property) that were found were supported by probable cause, and item 10 (corpse) wasn’t, but that … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: Where items included in SW without PC, severance of the warrant is required, not blanket suppression

TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

In 2011, Tennessee adopted the Exclusionary Rule Reform Act with a statutory good faith exception that included “clerical errors.” Failing to leave a copy of the warrant at the place searched or with the householder is not a “clerical error.” … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

IL: Once officers leave the premises after executing a SW, they need another to come back

Police searched defendant’s house with a warrant, unhandcuffed defendant, and left. Then they returned to search again. A second warrant was required. Just because they could have obtained a second warrant doesn’t mean that was inevitable discovery. [And what’s the … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IL: Once officers leave the premises after executing a SW, they need another to come back

PA: Warrant said “residence,” so it was not limited to garage, even though the PC was directed at it

The drug search warrant specified “the residence,” but the primary focus was the garage because that’s what the police knew. That did not mean, however, that only the garage could be searched. In the course of the drug investigation, police … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Warrant said “residence,” so it was not limited to garage, even though the PC was directed at it