Category Archives: Cell site location information

CA5: When govt addresses GFE, defendant must respond or waive it

In the Fifth Circuit it’s good faith first, probable cause second. The government addressed good faith in its brief, but defendant didn’t in his. Good faith prevails. United States v. Carroll, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 12280 (5th Cir. May 10, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: When govt addresses GFE, defendant must respond or waive it

NYTimes: Service Meant to Monitor Inmates’ Calls Could Track You, Too

NYTimes: Service Meant to Monitor Inmates’ Calls Could Track You, Too by Jennifer Valentino-DeVries:

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on NYTimes: Service Meant to Monitor Inmates’ Calls Could Track You, Too

S.D.N.Y.: No standing to complain of CSLI for somebody else’s phone

Defendants have no standing to challenge the seizure of CSLI on telephone numbers they don’t complain are theirs. United States v. Pizarro, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60539 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 10, 2018).* Police seizure of an SD card was by … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Independent source, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No standing to complain of CSLI for somebody else’s phone

Just Security: Opinion: Congress Should Place More Limits on Cellphone Location Tracking After Carpenter

Just Security: Opinion: Congress Should Place More Limits on Cellphone Location Tracking After Carpenter by by Jake Laperruque:

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on Just Security: Opinion: Congress Should Place More Limits on Cellphone Location Tracking After Carpenter

CA5: GFE applies to Texas DPS officers accessing E911 data to locate his phone with a court order (third opinion in case)

The good faith exception applies to Texas DPS officers accessing E911 data to locate his phone with a court order. [This is the third opinion in the case, and rehearing en banc was denied on a 7-8 vote.] United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to Texas DPS officers accessing E911 data to locate his phone with a court order (third opinion in case)

U.S. News & World Report: AP Explains: How a Phone May Have Steered Hunt for Bomber

U.S. News & World Report: AP Explains: How a Phone May Have Steered Hunt for Bomber by Michael Liedtke:

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on U.S. News & World Report: AP Explains: How a Phone May Have Steered Hunt for Bomber

TechCrunch: Report: Police are now asking Google for data about all mobile devices close to certain crimes

TechCrunch: Report: Police are now asking Google for data about all mobile devices close to certain crimes by Connie Loizos:

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on TechCrunch: Report: Police are now asking Google for data about all mobile devices close to certain crimes

MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

The 2008 CSLI warrant here was based on a “conclusory statement” of witness statements being credible and “bereft of the factual details required to establish probable cause.” It had to be suppressed. (Based on Fourth Amendment and state constitution.) Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

MN: Shoplifter placed stuff in her purse, and that made it subject to search incident

Defendant was observed shoplifting and put the allegedly stolen item into her purse. Outside, a struggle ensued, and defendant handed her purse off to another. It was subject to search incident because it was evidence [and an instrumentality] of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Search incident | Comments Off on MN: Shoplifter placed stuff in her purse, and that made it subject to search incident

WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge

WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge by Christopher Mimms: You are giving away more data about your location than you probably realize through the apps in your smartphone-and that data is being sold, often without your … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on WSJ: Your Location Data Is Being Sold-Often Without Your Knowledge

NE: Even if OnStar produced information the same day before the SW actually issued, inevitable discovery applies

Defendant claimed that the police obtained his OnStar information just before the search warrant for it issued. While that’s not conceded, it doesn’t matter because the search warrant was issued and the information retrieved the same day. Inevitable discovery applies, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NE: Even if OnStar produced information the same day before the SW actually issued, inevitable discovery applies

NY4: CSLI obtained by exigency mere third party information not subject to suppression

Police discovered defendant may have been involved in a quadruple homicide, and they submitted an exigent circumstances request for his CSLI for the four days around the homicide, and that put him there. His motion to suppress the CSLI was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NY4: CSLI obtained by exigency mere third party information not subject to suppression

NY4: Pinging cell phone was harmless error even if a warrant was required

The pinging of defendant’s cell phone to find him was without a warrant. If it was constitutional error, it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Moorer, 2018 NY Slip Op 00754, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 697 (4th … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Pinging cell phone was harmless error even if a warrant was required

NY Kings Co.: Claim def was Stingrayed was speculative; hearing to be set on CSLI

The same cell phone was used to set up three Craigslist robberies. Defendant’s claim that a cell site simulator was used to track his number is speculative at best and is rejected. He gets a hearing, however, on whether the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Claim def was Stingrayed was speculative; hearing to be set on CSLI

D.Md.: A SW for cell phone data going to Verizon in FL was within the court’s jurisdiction

Where the crime under investigation is in this district, it doesn’t matter that the search warrant for geolocation data from defendant’s cell phone is located in another district. The government can still get it by search warrant under Rule 41(b) … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: A SW for cell phone data going to Verizon in FL was within the court’s jurisdiction

Lawfare: The Best Way to Rule for Carpenter (Or, How to Expand Fourth Amendment Protections Without Making A Mess)

Lawfare: The Best Way to Rule for Carpenter (Or, How to Expand Fourth Amendment Protections Without Making A Mess) by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Cell site location information, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Lawfare: The Best Way to Rule for Carpenter (Or, How to Expand Fourth Amendment Protections Without Making A Mess)

NY4 declines to extend state const. and warrant requirement to CSLI

The state used CSLI and cell records on less than probable cause to connect defendant to a robbery victim. These are business records, and the court declines to extend a higher state constitutional standard to CSLI but recognizing that other … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, State constitution | Comments Off on NY4 declines to extend state const. and warrant requirement to CSLI

NYLJ: ‘Carpenter’ and ‘Weaver’: Strange Bedfellows?

NYLJ: ‘Carpenter’ and ‘Weaver’: Strange Bedfellows? Cyber Crime columnist Peter A. Crusco analyzes the issues raised in ‘Carpenter’ and compares them with those in ‘Weaver’ to shed new light on this evolving and often confusing area of privacy, third-party digital … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on NYLJ: ‘Carpenter’ and ‘Weaver’: Strange Bedfellows?

E.D.Va.: Circuit authority doesn’t require SW for CSLI, so there’s no point in waiting for Carpenter

CSLI without a search warrant is permitted under the law of this circuit, so there’s no point in waiting for Carpenter to be decided. [Without explicitly saying it, Davis good faith exception will apply.] United States v. Simmons, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Circuit authority doesn’t require SW for CSLI, so there’s no point in waiting for Carpenter

WaPo: The Supreme Court’s privacy case shows Congress needs to draw new lines

WaPo: The Supreme Court’s privacy case shows Congress needs to draw new lines:

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: The Supreme Court’s privacy case shows Congress needs to draw new lines