Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

NY4: Search of cell phone for texts led to SW; not inevitable discovery because SW sought because of illegal search

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights in his cell phone text messages were violated by the police searching them without a warrant. The fact they got a warrant later didn’t help them because that was the only reason to search the phone, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inevitable discovery, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY4: Search of cell phone for texts led to SW; not inevitable discovery because SW sought because of illegal search

WI: Probation condition against possession of a computer gives the PO power to search one found

Defendant had arson and sex offender convictions, and a term of probation was no computers without approval. They found a computer with live modems at his house, and he denied that the big computer worked, but he had a laptop. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WI: Probation condition against possession of a computer gives the PO power to search one found

NY1: Pawnbrokers have been heavily regulated for a century; rules for information storage are reasonable

Pawnbrokers have been a heavily regulated industry for over a century. NYC’s requirement of provision of certain information in digital format is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment (compare California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz) and the limited administrative searches are reasonable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY1: Pawnbrokers have been heavily regulated for a century; rules for information storage are reasonable

CA4: Drugs on an occupant of a vehicle supports a search of the trunk and other compartments

Drugs on an occupant of a vehicle supports a search of the trunk and other compartments. United States v. Brown, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1720 (4th Cir. Jan. 31, 2017). Defendant appeals a supervised release search term that does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA4: Drugs on an occupant of a vehicle supports a search of the trunk and other compartments

Law Review: Fourth Amendment Rights of Probationers: The Lack of Explicit Probation Conditions and Warrantless Searches

Fourth Amendment Rights of Probationers: The Lack of Explicit Probation Conditions and Warrantless Searches by Taylor S. Rothman at University of Chicago Legal Forum.

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Law Review: Fourth Amendment Rights of Probationers: The Lack of Explicit Probation Conditions and Warrantless Searches

CA8: Supervised release term of “random inspections of his computer’s internet and email usage history” reasonably justified search of def’s computer

Supervised release term of “random inspections of his computer’s internet and email usage history” reasonably justified search of defendant’s computer. United States v. McCoy, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1695 (8th Cir. Jan. 31, 2017):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Supervised release term of “random inspections of his computer’s internet and email usage history” reasonably justified search of def’s computer

Cal.6th: Broad electronic search probation condition was justified by the crime

The defendant juvenile took pictures of his having sex with a girl he was in school with and then he blackmailed her. He was found delinquent under the juvenile law for possession of child pornography and extortion. The broad probation … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.6th: Broad electronic search probation condition was justified by the crime

M.D.Pa.: Girlfriend’s misstatement about presence of other persons in house during probation search justified protective sweep

“[O]fficers went to Mr. Owens’ residence to conduct a probationary check. After knocking on the door, officers were told by Mr. Owens’ girlfriend, Ms. Haqq, that he was not present and that she was the only adult at the residence. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Girlfriend’s misstatement about presence of other persons in house during probation search justified protective sweep

FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress under the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement because the trial court’s finding that the detective’s intrusion onto the curtilage was justified for officer safety was not supported by … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on FL2: Protective sweep of curtilage unreasonable; CI’s tip of obvious details to any observer not corroborated

WA: There must be a nexus between the scope of a parole search and what is being looked for

“¶17 We agree with [State v. Jardinez, 184 Wn. App. 518, 338 P.3d 292 (2014)] that the [Sentencing Guidelines] Commission’s comment is strong evidence that the legislature intended that there must be a nexus between the suspected violation and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WA: There must be a nexus between the scope of a parole search and what is being looked for

W.D.N.Y.: CI with good track record isn’t less believable because she had a relationship with the def which “soured”

The CI in this case had a track record. Then she was involved with defendant, and then she set defendant up, too. The fact their relationship “soured” didn’t undermine her credibility on the question of probable cause. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: CI with good track record isn’t less believable because she had a relationship with the def which “soured”

PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings

PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings. The court engages in a lengthy and sensitive analysis. Commonwealth v. Arter, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2916 (Dec. 28, 2016):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings

E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee to catch others in a DTO was [somehow] not unreasonable

In a really strange case, a GPS monitor to track curfew violations of a parolee was left on for 791 days. The parole officers and then other officers watched where he was going to attempt to crack a drug trafficking … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: 791 days of GPS tracking of a parolee to catch others in a DTO was [somehow] not unreasonable

E.D.Wis.: Software to monitor computer usage of person on supervised release not unreasonable if necessary in the first place

Defendant was under court ordered computer monitoring as a condition of his supervised release, and software was installed on his computer and then his cell phone to monitor his text messages and internet searches. Seventh Circuit precedent forecloses defendant’s argument … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Software to monitor computer usage of person on supervised release not unreasonable if necessary in the first place

E.D.N.C.: Post-release supervision home search before dawn wasn’t reasonable

Defendant was subject to home post-release supervision visits conducted at reasonable times. This one was 6:00-6:15 am when sunrise was nearly 7 am. This was effectively a nighttime search of his house and was thus unreasonable. Suppressed. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Post-release supervision home search before dawn wasn’t reasonable

PA: An unannounced home visit of a probationer doesn’t require RS

Defendant was on probation, and the unannounced probation home visit resulted in a plain view of cocaine that was admissible in evidence. The home visits were provided for in the probation agreement, and they did not have to be based … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on PA: An unannounced home visit of a probationer doesn’t require RS

E.D.Tenn.: Consent in the face of a parole search condition isn’t involuntary

Defendant’s consent to a search when confronted with the fact he was subject to a parole search doesn’t make it involuntary. United States v. Foster, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161940 (E.D.Tenn. Sept. 28, 2016). The California federal court’s supervised release … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent in the face of a parole search condition isn’t involuntary

AZ: No state const’l right to RS for a parole search; good policy reasons for suspicionless parole searches

In a wide ranging opinion on parole searches, the Arizona court holds that there is no Fourth Amendment or state constitutional requirement of reasonable suspicion for a parole search. There are good policy reasons for suspicionless searches. State v. Adair, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AZ: No state const’l right to RS for a parole search; good policy reasons for suspicionless parole searches

VT: Probation officer’s home visit is not a search

A probation officer’s home visit is not a search. Levitt v. State, 2016 VT 60, ¶ 32. State v. Albarelli, 2016 VT 119, 2016 Vt. LEXIS 121 (Nov. 18, 2016). The DUI roadblock in this case was established in accord … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probation / Parole search, Roadblocks | Comments Off on VT: Probation officer’s home visit is not a search

E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t [hardly ever] apply to violations of supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of supervised release, but it might be possible if the deterrence rationale could still apply sometimes, just not here. “Thus, just like in Scott, applying the rule would inhibit the government’s ability … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t [hardly ever] apply to violations of supervised release