Category Archives: Arrest or entry on arrest

CA1: Officers lacked sufficient info def was in girlfriend’s apt to enter on arrest warrant

Officers lacked sufficient information on the totality defendant would be found at his girlfriend’s apartment when they entered on an arrest warrant. Most of the information was from a CI that it was logical he was there and he hadn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA1: Officers lacked sufficient info def was in girlfriend’s apt to enter on arrest warrant

W.D.Ohio: Factual basis for stop overcomes pretext

There was a factual basis for the stop, so the pretext argument fails. United States v. Diaz-Cordova, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91591 (N.D.Ohio July 14, 2016). It appears that the U.S. Marshals had objectively reasonable belief that defendant was where … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext | Comments Off on W.D.Ohio: Factual basis for stop overcomes pretext

N.D.Cal.: Listening devices in a public place overcame any reasonable expectation of privacy; 1984 was not just a book — it’s here

The FBI planted recording devices outside two courthouses in Northern California to catch conversations on the street between their targets. The devices were planted in a light fixture, a bus stop, and on a parked vehicle. The court finds no … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Listening devices in a public place overcame any reasonable expectation of privacy; 1984 was not just a book — it’s here

MO: Officers serving arrest warrant found a house full of gas from a working meth lab and could enter

Officers came to defendant’s house to arrest him on a warrant. When the door was open, there was a cloud of smoke that smelled like a working meth lab. One officer left to get a warrant. Another opened doors to … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Officers serving arrest warrant found a house full of gas from a working meth lab and could enter

Columbia Journalism Review: A reporter’s arrest is just the latest reason to worry about press freedom in Missouri

Columbia Journalism Review: A reporter’s arrest is just the latest reason to worry about press freedom in Missouri by Doran Lee:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Columbia Journalism Review: A reporter’s arrest is just the latest reason to worry about press freedom in Missouri

ID: Michigan v. Summers on detention of bystanders can apply to arrest warrants, too

Summers rationale of detaining bystanders when executing a search warrant can apply to arrest warrants. Here, the target of the arrest warrant fled, and that justified the officers in detaining the others just in case of a risk of a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Michigan v. Summers on detention of bystanders can apply to arrest warrants, too

OR: WA state trooper couldn’t make stop in OR under statute or common law; citizen’s arrest doesn’t apply to traffic offenses

Defendant was stopped for speeding by a Washington State Trooper who followed defendant into Oregon. The out-of-state officer didn’t have any statutory authority for a stop and the common law didn’t permit officers outside their jurisdiction to make stops. Citizen’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Common law, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: WA state trooper couldn’t make stop in OR under statute or common law; citizen’s arrest doesn’t apply to traffic offenses

W.D.N.Y.: When def saw police at door, he stepped back, and that justified their coming in to arrest him on a warrant

Defendant’s arrest with a warrant inside his apartment was valid, and the constitution didn’t required he be pulled outside to arrest. He stepped back when he saw the officers and they came in and arrested him. A limited protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When def saw police at door, he stepped back, and that justified their coming in to arrest him on a warrant

D.S.D.: No suppression for any alleged violation of Vienna Convention for dual U.S.-Canadian citizen

Defendant was indicted for selling fellatio from his 17 year old cousin and a 15 year old at the 2014 Sturgis motorcycle rally. There was probable cause for his arrest. Any alleged violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Rights … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on D.S.D.: No suppression for any alleged violation of Vienna Convention for dual U.S.-Canadian citizen

CA3: Officers had PC to believe ptf was in a motor home for entry to arrest

Plaintiff was calling police dispatch from a cell phone. Dispatch was able to trace the cell phone apparently via the 911 system. Officers had an arrest warrant for plaintiff, and they had probable cause to believe that she was in … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Officers had PC to believe ptf was in a motor home for entry to arrest

OH8: Working meth lab found on execution of arrest warrant was exigency

Officers at defendant’s house to execute an arrest warrant had exigent circumstances when they found a probable working methamphetamine lab. State v. Maust, 2016-Ohio-3171, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2101 (8th Dist. May 26, 2016). Defendant’s stop was justified by his … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH8: Working meth lab found on execution of arrest warrant was exigency

D.P.R.: Under Payton, there’s a difference between where an arrestee “could be found” and “would be found”

Just because PRPD had two addresses for defendant as places he’d lived before didn’t give reason to believe he was there at the time they entered with an arrest warrant. That it “could be” a place he’d be found doesn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Under Payton, there’s a difference between where an arrestee “could be found” and “would be found”

CA2: When the subject of of an arrest warrant is in a third party’s house, Payton governs the entry as to him and Stegald as to the resident

When the subject of of an arrest warrant is in a third party’s house, Payton governs the entry as to him and Stegald as to the resident. This entry satisfied Payton, and the suppression order is reversed. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA2: When the subject of of an arrest warrant is in a third party’s house, Payton governs the entry as to him and Stegald as to the resident

CA3: USM had PC to believe decedent at home to enter to arrest despite his mother’s denials

Despite decedent’s mother’s apparent denial decedent was in the house, U.S. Marshals entered with an arrest warrant for him and probable cause to believe he was there. He died from a gunshot to the head, but the only evidence available … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA3: USM had PC to believe decedent at home to enter to arrest despite his mother’s denials

CA6: Clerk issued arrest warrant without judicial authority; not unreasonable unless no PC

That court clerks issue arrest warrants, but not acting as a neutral and detached magistrate, is not a constitutional violation unless the arrest was without probable cause. Plaintiffs, given four amendments to the complaint, never show that the arrest was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Clerk issued arrest warrant without judicial authority; not unreasonable unless no PC

CA3: Payton’s “reason to believe” language from Payton/Steagald amounts to probable cause, noting conflict

Payton’s “reason to believe” language from Payton/Steagald amounts to probable cause, such that officers who have an arrest warrant for a suspect have to show “probable cause” that the suspect resides at or is present at a particular address before … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Payton’s “reason to believe” language from Payton/Steagald amounts to probable cause, noting conflict

W.D.Okla.: Ping order not subject to exclusionary rule under ECPA

A cell phone ping order allegedly in violation of ECPA was not subject to suppression. The warrantless entry into the house was justified by exigent circumstances. United States v. Banks, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53876 (W.D.Okla. April 22, 2016). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, ECPA, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Ping order not subject to exclusionary rule under ECPA

FL: Moran v. Burbine rejected under FL const.; due process right to have lawyer who showed up admitted for questioning

A person being questioned at the police station has a state due process right to know that a lawyer has shown up on his or her behalf, and the police have to let the lawyer in. Moran v. Burbine rejected … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on FL: Moran v. Burbine rejected under FL const.; due process right to have lawyer who showed up admitted for questioning

CA1: Prior arrest warrant and public records put subject of arrest warrant at address; sufficient under Payton

The police had good reason under Payton to believe that a man wanted in an arrest warrant would be found at defendant’s house: An outstanding arrest warrant listed that address, postal records showed he got mail there, and other public … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA1: Prior arrest warrant and public records put subject of arrest warrant at address; sufficient under Payton

CA8: Protective sweep of a camper was reasonable because another was inside when def was arrested

Defendant was supposed to sell methamphetamine from his camper at a campsite to an undercover officer, but he declined, so the officer attempted to arrest him outside the camper on an outstanding warrant and he fled. He went to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: Protective sweep of a camper was reasonable because another was inside when def was arrested