Category Archives: Standing

S.D.Fla.: Officer’s presence on driveway didn’t violate curtilage

Defendant showed a reasonable expectation of privacy in his grandmother’s house because he’d been living there for years, got mail there, and had been arrested there at least twice before: It was his residence. The driveway of the house was … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Officer’s presence on driveway didn’t violate curtilage

S.D.Fla.: No standing in a rental car obtained with a fake ID and CC and then turned over to another

Defendant had no standing in this rental car rented in a false name with a fake ID and credit card and then he drove the car away and then turned the car over to a co-conspirator who was driving at … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: No standing in a rental car obtained with a fake ID and CC and then turned over to another

FL: Def’s girlfriend had full access to his place to remove a knife she told police about

Defendant’s girlfriend retrieved a knife for the police and brought it out. She spent five nights a week there, and she happened to see it on this trip when she went in to let the dog out. She had complete … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing | Comments Off on FL: Def’s girlfriend had full access to his place to remove a knife she told police about

S.D.Cal.: A cursory search of a cell phone of a person arrested for importation of drugs was permissible under the border search exception

A cursory search of a cell phone of a person arrested for importation of drugs was permissible under the border search exception. This was no deep forensic evaluation. Defendant also showed standing in the cell phone in his possession. “Specifically, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: A cursory search of a cell phone of a person arrested for importation of drugs was permissible under the border search exception

MO: Driver had standing because passenger was owner of car

Defendant was driving his girlfriend’s car, and she was the passenger. Stopped for a traffic offense, the officer found a warrant from another town, but advised that they didn’t want him arrested on it. The paperwork on the car was … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on MO: Driver had standing because passenger was owner of car

TX: Common law and HIPAA creates a privacy interest in medical records; but GJ subpoena good enough

A hospital patient (here suspected of DUI) has a privacy interest in his medical records sufficient to give standing to challenge their acquisition by the state, but prior to HIPAA under state case law and bolstered by HIPAA. But, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on TX: Common law and HIPAA creates a privacy interest in medical records; but GJ subpoena good enough

FL5: Def showed standing in duffle bag in car he was a passenger in

The trial court denied the motion to suppress without a hearing, and the state concedes error. Defendant showed enough standing in at least the search of his own bag in the car to get a hearing on the legality of … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on FL5: Def showed standing in duffle bag in car he was a passenger in

MS: Denial of privacy interest in shed behind rented mobile home meant no standing there

In a knock-and-talk, defendant denied any interest in a shed behind her mobile home. While the police were outside, she’d delivered a box to her boyfriend there. She consented to a search of the mobile home. That denial denies her … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on MS: Denial of privacy interest in shed behind rented mobile home meant no standing there

OH9: Randolph doesn’t require target be asked for consent first

Defendant’s wife consented to the search of their house. There is no duty of the police to first ask the target of the search for consent under Randolph. The claim her consent wasn’t voluntary wasn’t in the motion to suppress … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: Randolph doesn’t require target be asked for consent first

NY4: Driver has no standing in search of passenger’s person

Defendant has no standing to contest the search of the person of the passenger in his car. People v. Gibson, 2016 NY Slip Op 02193, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2171 (4th Dept. March 25, 2016). There was justification for … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: Driver has no standing in search of passenger’s person

TX1: Def carries burden of proof on standing; a mere footnote in a motion to suppress wasn’t enough

As a passenger, defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in computers found in the car because he did not attempt to prove they were his. The motion to suppress said they were his but he put on no proof. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: Def carries burden of proof on standing; a mere footnote in a motion to suppress wasn’t enough

NE: Def didn’t have standing in her husband’s cell phone when they lived apart

Defendant had no standing in photographs on her husband’s cell phone. They’d lived apart for five months, had separate accounts, and his was password protected. She had no right to it or the ability to exclude others; therefore, no standing. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on NE: Def didn’t have standing in her husband’s cell phone when they lived apart

D.Kan.: Def invited in by homeowners’ daughter without their knowledge had standing

Defendant had standing in the homeowner’s house where he’d been invited in by the daughter and spent the night many times. The protective sweep here was objectively reasonable. United States v. Nelson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28209 (D.Kan. March 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Def invited in by homeowners’ daughter without their knowledge had standing

E.D.N.C.: Being a mere drug handler in a drug house doesn’t give standing

Defendant lacked standing in the place searched because he lived elsewhere, and he was there helping run drugs through the house. United States v. Espindola-Pineda, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24489 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016), adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24488 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Being a mere drug handler in a drug house doesn’t give standing

S.D.Ga.: Corporate officer had no standing in corporation’s website police essentially hacked into

Defendant ran pmxrefinery.com which was under investigation for fraudulent invoices. The police contacted the website’s designer who volunteered the log-in credentials to the police without even being asked because she, too, suspected he was up to no good. Getting into … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Corporate officer had no standing in corporation’s website police essentially hacked into

OH12: Having a key to mom’s apt doesn’t give son standing when he didn’t live there

Defendant kept drugs in his mother’s apartment, but he wasn’t her tenant nor was he an overnight guest. [Essentially he used her place as a stash house.] The mere fact he had a key to her apartment didn’t give him … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on OH12: Having a key to mom’s apt doesn’t give son standing when he didn’t live there

FL4: State failed to prove inventory policy; def had standing in his own suitcase, albeit not the car

Defendant was neither the owner nor driver of the car he was riding in which had his suitcase in the trunk. He didn’t have standing as to a search of the car, but he did have standing as to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on FL4: State failed to prove inventory policy; def had standing in his own suitcase, albeit not the car

PA: Whether the trash search leading to the search warrant was really on Wednesday not Thursday not material

Defendant’s trash was on an alleyway where all the other residents of that street put their trash, so it wasn’t on the curtilage. Based on the trash search, a warrant was sought for the house, but there was a mistake … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on PA: Whether the trash search leading to the search warrant was really on Wednesday not Thursday not material

W.D.Pa.: Request for a Franks hearing obviated by def’s lack of standing in place searched

To get a Franks hearing, it’s necessary to make an offer of proof, and defendant failed to do so. Defendant does not get a Franks hearing here because he also didn’t show that he’d have standing to make the challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Request for a Franks hearing obviated by def’s lack of standing in place searched

S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing

Defendant’s motion to suppress was denied because he didn’t even suggest in his papers he had standing in the vehicle he was only a passenger in. United States v. Londonio, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8472 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2016). There … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Motion to suppress denied for lack of proffer on standing