Category Archives: Franks doctrine

S.D.Ohio: More than a conclusory statement of recklessness or intent required for Franks hearing

Just because information is erroneous doesn’t get you a Franks hearing. More than a mere conclusion is required that the statement was recklessly or deliberately false. United States v. Kurtz, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160356 (S.D.Ohio Nov. 18, 2016). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: More than a conclusory statement of recklessness or intent required for Franks hearing

E.D.Wash.: Defending on lack of connection to property was best course; no IAC for lack of standing, and if motion made it would have lost on merits, too

Defendant’s counsel wasn’t ineffective: “This Court unequivocally finds that Defendant manifested a deliberate abandonment to any interest in his neighbor’s shed. Counsel was not ineffective by tactically defending the charge by highlighting the absence of positive evidence tying Defendant to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Defending on lack of connection to property was best course; no IAC for lack of standing, and if motion made it would have lost on merits, too

CADC: Bomb squad’s search hours later was not exigent and no QI

A top to bottom search of plaintiff’s home by the D.C. bomb squad hours into a “situation” at his home (actually based on a mistake) wasn’t remotely justified by exigent circumstances. Moreover, qualified immunity doesn’t apply (2-1 on this issue) … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Independent source | Comments Off on CADC: Bomb squad’s search hours later was not exigent and no QI

OH1: Vehicle weapon frisk reasonable despite def being out of car

The officer’s frisk of defendant’s vehicle for a weapon was reasonable on reasonable suspicion even though defendant was out of the car. It wouldn’t be hard for him to get back to car. [Seems difficult to imagine a vehicle frisk … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Vehicle weapon frisk reasonable despite def being out of car

W.D.N.C.: Franks does include a right to a hearing without making a prima facie showing

Defendant doesn’t get an opportunity to test the truth of the affidavit under Franks in a hearing without making a prima facie case of materiality and wilful falsity. United States v. Payne, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127287 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 9, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Franks does include a right to a hearing without making a prima facie showing

W.D.Mo.: Smell of raw marijuana on the person is PC for a search

“In addition, in getting near to Jackson, Det. Garcia could smell unburnt marijuana on his person. Under these facts, the Court concludes that Det. Garcia had probable cause to arrest Jackson.” United States v. Jackson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124091 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Smell of raw marijuana on the person is PC for a search

E.D.Mich.: Rule 41(b)(4) tracking order can’t be issued by state judge

A Rule 41(b)(4) tracking order was issued by a state court judge when a USMJ was unavailable. The court finds state judges can issue search warrant but not tracking orders, and the Advisory Committee notes made that clear. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Rule 41(b)(4) tracking order can’t be issued by state judge

D.Neb.: Information for Franks hearing needs to be made to USMJ, not on appeal to USDJ

When making a Franks challenge to the USMJ, defendant must come forward with the information then, not on the request for review to the USDJ. “The Magistrate Judge did not state on the record his specific reasoning for a finding … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Information for Franks hearing needs to be made to USMJ, not on appeal to USDJ

W.D.N.Y.: Def had hood of car open and police told him to put his hands up, he did, then fled; he was seized w/o RS [Updated: rev’d 12/13/16]

Officers saw defendant by his car with the hood open. Something about his elbow body language made them want to stop him. They told him to raise his hands. He did, then he fled. The court finds the directive was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had hood of car open and police told him to put his hands up, he did, then fled; he was seized w/o RS [Updated: rev’d 12/13/16]

VI: No REP in a bag on ground outside an apt building

Defendant’s apartment was subjected to a search warrant, and defendant argued that a Crown Royal bag outside on the ground was outside the scope of the warrant and couldn’t be seized. The court applies Dunn and the curtilage analysis to … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on VI: No REP in a bag on ground outside an apt building

TX11: A search for evidence under an unconstitutional statute still suppressed in Texas despite good faith

Search for evidence under a statute later declared unconstitutional in state court had to be suppressed because Texas has only a limited good faith exception. Siller v. State, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 8733 (Tex.App. – Eastland Aug. 11, 2016). Speculative … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TX11: A search for evidence under an unconstitutional statute still suppressed in Texas despite good faith

E.D.Mich.: Omission of CI’s prior inconsistent statement didn’t require Franks hearing

The fact that more detail could have been included, including prior inconsistent statements of informants, that doesn’t make a search warrant affidavit false or misleading for Franks purposes because it wouldn’t change outcome. United States v. Davis, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Omission of CI’s prior inconsistent statement didn’t require Franks hearing

ID: A party doesn’t have to cite specific case law to preserve its Fourth Amendment argument if it otherwise says the right words

The state doesn’t have to cite specific case law to preserve its argument; just make the argument. Here, it was that defendant was stopped for wandering on the road and that produced no DL and that he was driving a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: A party doesn’t have to cite specific case law to preserve its Fourth Amendment argument if it otherwise says the right words

D.Colo.: Rare proved Franks violation; suppression required because of intent; no severability of a SW after Franks violation

Defendant was a chiropractor being investigated for health fraud, and the investigators procured a search warrant for records. Defendant was the target of an administrative investigation that produced a settlement, an Admonition Letter, with no finding of fault or fraud. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Rare proved Franks violation; suppression required because of intent; no severability of a SW after Franks violation

D.Nev.: Omission of details of a protective sweep not Franks issue where magistrate had to know about it

Police officer’s omission of details of a protective sweep from an affidavit for a search warrant did not support a Franks claim as to how he reported responding to a 911 shots fired call. The protective sweep wasn’t even hidden; … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Omission of details of a protective sweep not Franks issue where magistrate had to know about it

CA10: Stone v. Powell’s “full and fair opportunity” to litigate search claim below couldn’t be established on this record

The state record on habeas was inadequate to determine whether petitioner actually got a “full and fair opportunity” to litigate his search claim, so the case is remanded to get the state court record before the district court. Thornton v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Stone v. Powell’s “full and fair opportunity” to litigate search claim below couldn’t be established on this record

ID: Denial of ownership of a lockbox tossed onto ground by girlfriend was abandonment

Defendant’s denying ownership of a lockbox tossed onto the ground by his girlfriend saying it wasn’t his was a waiver of any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. State v. Melling, 2016 Ida. App. LEXIS 46 (April 6, 2016). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: Denial of ownership of a lockbox tossed onto ground by girlfriend was abandonment

FL5: Pre-McNeely warrantless blood draw saved by GFE

A pre-McNeely warrantless blood draw was unconstitutional now but saved by the good faith exception because it was valid at the time it happened. State v. Liles, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427 (Fla. 5th DCA April 8, 2016). Arguing over … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL5: Pre-McNeely warrantless blood draw saved by GFE

CA8: Where two crimes alleged in affidavit and PC as to each is sufficient, Franks challenge to one is moot

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails: There were two unrelated crimes referred to, and the PC as to the drug crime was not challenged. As to the other, that wasn’t even in federal court, so it doesn’t matter and wasn’t material to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Where two crimes alleged in affidavit and PC as to each is sufficient, Franks challenge to one is moot

D.Nev.: On Franks challenge, officer credited that the time stamp on digital pictures was just erroneous

The Franks issues did not rise to materiality. The officer was credible that the time stamp on the digital photograph showed the picture taken before the search rather than after was an error on the camera because he didn’t check … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: On Franks challenge, officer credited that the time stamp on digital pictures was just erroneous