Category Archives: Warrant execution

W.D.Ky.: Not unreasonable under 4A that state “track and trace” warrant was served by fax in another jurisdiction; at least GFE applies

A state district court judge of apparent limited jurisdiction, not general criminal jurisdiction, had apparent authority to approve a “track and trace” order, or at least subject to the good faith exception. Suppression here would prove nothing at all. As … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Not unreasonable under 4A that state “track and trace” warrant was served by fax in another jurisdiction; at least GFE applies

CA8: SW for already seized cell phone came from SW for far more; apparently created confusion, but not suppression

Officers had seized defendant’s phone and applied for a search warrant for it and other things at the same time, and that led to a motion to suppress the phone search. “Suellentrop argues that the search of the phone was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: SW for already seized cell phone came from SW for far more; apparently created confusion, but not suppression

M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

A delay of seven weeks for seeking a search warrant for a cell phone already validly seized wasn’t unreasonable. Several cases approved long delays, and this is near the outer limit, but still valid. United States v. Butler, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

CA4: Some damage can be expected in execution of a SW; is it “objectively reasonable” or not?

Some damage can be expected in executing a search warrant. Whether it was so excessive to be objectively unreasonable is the question. Here, there was damage, but it wasn’t unreasonable under the circumstances, and the officers get qualified immunity. Cybernet, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Some damage can be expected in execution of a SW; is it “objectively reasonable” or not?

CA4: Even if Rule 41 was violated by not leaving application for SW at scene it wasn’t prejudicial or intentional

“Here, the district court credited Agent Hayes’ testimony that he left a copy of the face of the warrant and an inventory of the items seized in the search, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(f)(1)(C), but that he did not … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Even if Rule 41 was violated by not leaving application for SW at scene it wasn’t prejudicial or intentional

S.D.N.Y.: Govt satisfied § 2705(b) nondisclosure requirements; NDO didn’t violate 1A

The government showed a justifiable basis for a nondisclosure order (NDO) under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b) of the order directed to Google for six email accounts. Assuming strict scrutiny applied, the government showed it because nondisclosure could prevent compromising an … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt satisfied § 2705(b) nondisclosure requirements; NDO didn’t violate 1A

FL2: Direct contempt for refusing to provide passcode for cell phone search reversed; out-of-court evidence couldn’t be considered

Defendant was held in contempt and sentenced to five months and 29 days for refusing to provide the passcode for his cell phone so it could be searched under a warrant. “However, whether a finding of contempt could have been … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on FL2: Direct contempt for refusing to provide passcode for cell phone search reversed; out-of-court evidence couldn’t be considered

WY: Refusing to permit execution of SW for blood BAC supported obstruction conviction

Defendant was properly convicted of obstruction of a peace officer for refusing to permit a search of his blood under a search warrant. Garza v. State, 2020 WY 32, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 34 (Mar. 4, 2020). “Bennett-Martin cannot recover compensatory … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WY: Refusing to permit execution of SW for blood BAC supported obstruction conviction

W.D.N.Y.: Def lacked standing in apts he owned and rented to relatives

Defendant lacked standing to contest the search of an apartment building he owned but rented the units out to relatives. The CI, however, puts the defendant in one of the apartments with cocaine and a firearm ten days before the … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def lacked standing in apts he owned and rented to relatives

techdirt: Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed

techdirt: Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on techdirt: Supreme Court Asked To Tell Cops That Consenting To A Search Is Not Consenting To Having Your Home Destroyed

NYTimes: Have a Search Warrant for Data? Google Wants You to Pay

NYTimes: Have a Search Warrant for Data? Google Wants You to Pay by Gabriel J.X. Dance and Jennifer Valentino-DeVries (“The tech giant has begun charging U.S. law enforcement for responses to search warrants and subpoenas.”): Facing an increasing number of … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NYTimes: Have a Search Warrant for Data? Google Wants You to Pay

PA: SW for cell phone extraction executed after expiration was treated as a warrantless search

A search warrant executed on cell phones for extraction of data expired four days before the search. Therefore, the search was warrantless, and the trial court should have suppressed. Commonwealth v. Bowens, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 22 (Jan. 17, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: SW for cell phone extraction executed after expiration was treated as a warrantless search

M.D.Ala.: No constitutional requirement that the SW be served on the target of the search, so the missing attachment didn’t matter

There is no constitutional requirement that the search warrant be served on the target of the search, so the missing attachment didn’t matter. “As stated above, the record demonstrates with reasonable certainty that a warrant stating with particularity the items … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: No constitutional requirement that the SW be served on the target of the search, so the missing attachment didn’t matter

WaPo: Investigative tool used in law firm searches at risk, federal prosecutors fear

WaPo: Investigative tool used in law firm searches at risk, federal prosecutors fear by Ann E. Marimow (“Last spring, more than a dozen federal agents spent six hours searching the law firm of a prominent Maryland attorney, sweeping up thousands … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Investigative tool used in law firm searches at risk, federal prosecutors fear

E.D.Pa.: Leaked existence of federal SW that had press there before the SW results in statutory damages award

Plaintiff sued the government because the IRS and FBI leaked to the media a search warrant for his premises and the media was there. He got $1000 in statutory damages. He filed an untimely motion to reopen based on alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Leaked existence of federal SW that had press there before the SW results in statutory damages award

NC: Reasonable force can be used for a DUI blood draw under SW when def refuses

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s blood while he was in the hospital for an accident. Relying on United States v. Bullock, 71 F.3d 171 (5th Cir. 1995), the court concludes that reasonable force can be used to take … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NC: Reasonable force can be used for a DUI blood draw under SW when def refuses

M.D.Pa. Delay in searching cell phones wasn’t unreasonable because def was in jail out of possession anyway

The delay between seizing defendant’s cell phones and searching them wasn’t unreasonable considering he was in jail and would have had no access to them anyway. United States v. Carey, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1150 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 6, 2020). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Pa. Delay in searching cell phones wasn’t unreasonable because def was in jail out of possession anyway

CA4: Two address typos in affidavit for SW along with correct address twice and correct address in SW not error

There were two address typos in the affidavit, but it was in there correct twice, too. The warrant was correct. The search was reasonable. “In these circumstances, the technical errors in the search warrant affidavit did not invalidate the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Two address typos in affidavit for SW along with correct address twice and correct address in SW not error

CA9: There was PC for the warrant for the premises, and officers were not unreasonable in continuing the search for an hour when they learned their target didn’t live there

Officers got a search warrant for a mobile home, and found out when they executed it that their target didn’t live there. The search warrant was based on informant hearsay that was reliable enough for the search warrant to issue. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: There was PC for the warrant for the premises, and officers were not unreasonable in continuing the search for an hour when they learned their target didn’t live there

AR: Prosecutor also didn’t know for a year that an HBO documentary crew was present at search; no discovery violation on SW materials

About a year after the execution of the search warrant, the parties learned that an HBO documentary crew recording Meth Storm was along for the search. Citing Layne v. Wilson and Brady, the defense sought access to the video and … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AR: Prosecutor also didn’t know for a year that an HBO documentary crew was present at search; no discovery violation on SW materials