Daily Archives: December 8, 2023

LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

“In our view, the trial court did not err in finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless procurement of Defendant’s cell-site information. Defendant was attempting to flee from the investigation of this violent crime, [and there was a serious risk … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

Marshall Project: I ‘Stood My Ground’ — but It Was the Police Raiding My House

The Marshall Project: I ‘Stood My Ground’ — but It Was the Police Raiding My House (“Diamonds Ford thought she was shooting at an intruder when Florida cops raided her home without knocking. Then she was charged with attempted murder.”)

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Marshall Project: I ‘Stood My Ground’ — but It Was the Police Raiding My House

NYLJ: New York’s Red Flag Law Raises a Red Flag for the Fourth Amendment

NYLJ: New York’s Red Flag Law Raises a Red Flag for the Fourth Amendment (“New York’s Legislature should revise the Red Flag Law to expressly comport with the form and content requirements of search warrant applications pursuant to CPL 690. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on NYLJ: New York’s Red Flag Law Raises a Red Flag for the Fourth Amendment

D.P.R.: Cell phone records obtained by SW not self-authenticating as evidence under 902(11)

Cell phone records obtained by warrant are not self-authenticating under F.R.E. 902(11). More will be required. United States v. Charbonier-Laureano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218249 (D.P.R. Dec. 5, 2023). The government’s knowledge fraud co-conspirators communicated by cell phone during period … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Cell phone records obtained by SW not self-authenticating as evidence under 902(11)

W.D.Wis.: No habeas relief for unlawful arrest

That 2254 petitioner’s state arrest was unreasonable doesn’t state grounds for relief from a conviction. Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 306, 321 (1983). Ramirez v. Meisner, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218142 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 6, 2023). Defendant had no standing … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: No habeas relief for unlawful arrest

WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

Defendant’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein was not a critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited. State v. Heng, 2023 Wash. LEXIS 603 (Dec. 7, 2023). “The government contends that [the search] was justified both … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

CA5: Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity

Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity. “On the well-pleaded facts of this case, Walls was not suspected of any crime, posed no immediate threat to the safety of the deputies or others, and made no attempt … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity