Category Archives: Burden of proof

IA: Where state stipulated needing PC for its actions, it couldn’t argue RS was sufficient on appeal; it’s bound by its argument below

Where the state argues reasonable suspicion justified the officer’s actions, they had to say so in the trial court. Instead, they proceeded on the theory they needed probable cause, and that’s what they’re bound by on appeal. State v. Steffens, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on IA: Where state stipulated needing PC for its actions, it couldn’t argue RS was sufficient on appeal; it’s bound by its argument below

AK: Reconsideration of finding of no PC granted; def never really put lack of PC in issue

At issue was a seizure and then warranted search of defendant’s cell phone looking for an incriminating text message that was already seen by the police on the recipient’s cell phone. At the hearing, the Superior Court granted a motion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AK: Reconsideration of finding of no PC granted; def never really put lack of PC in issue

DE: Consent to search can’t be proved “entirely upon hearsay”

Hearsay that defendant consented, in testimony from an officer who was not present, was insufficient to show consent. Even if it could, the hearsay didn’t satisfy the standards of showing voluntariness. Then, the search of his person being invalid, the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on DE: Consent to search can’t be proved “entirely upon hearsay”

D.Me.: Officer doesn’t have to articulate the RS for continuing the stop

The officer doesn’t have a constitutional obligation to tell (“articulate”) the suspect the reasonable suspicion that forms the basis of the stop. “Cf. Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146, 155 (2004) (‘While it is assuredly good police practice to inform … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Officer doesn’t have to articulate the RS for continuing the stop

CO: Officers had clear indication def had drugs in mouth for body search on exigency

There was a clear indication that defendant had hidden drugs in his mouth, and that was exigency for a search of his mouth. When the state as appellee argues there is probable cause for defendant’s arrest and the opening brief … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Burden of proof | Comments Off on CO: Officers had clear indication def had drugs in mouth for body search on exigency

NY3: Cursory suppression motion properly denied on its face

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. “Defendant made only a brief, conclusory claim that there was no probable cause for his arrest, lacking factual support ….” On his consent claim of lack of consent, the lack of factual support didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Search incident | Comments Off on NY3: Cursory suppression motion properly denied on its face

OH10: Failing to raise suppression issue at trial court was waived for appeal

Defendant waived his argument related to a prolonged detention by failing to raise it in his motions to suppress or at the suppression hearings, and then only by raising the argument for the first time on appeal. State v. Geiger, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Failing to raise suppression issue at trial court was waived for appeal

OH8: State admin subpoena might be burdensome and time consuming but it’s not unreasonable

“While GMS might find some of the Commission’s investigative techniques time consuming and burdensome, GMS is unable to show that the Commission’s investigations violated the Fourth Amendment or otherwise fell outside the scope of what is permitted under statute.” GMS … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of proof | Comments Off on OH8: State admin subpoena might be burdensome and time consuming but it’s not unreasonable

S.D.Ohio: Clause in SW that is overbroad requires def to show what was seized under it

One overbroad clause in the search warrant didn’t require exclusion of the rest that was specifically covered. Defendant also didn’t show that which was seized under the overbroad section to have it excluded. United States v. Traum, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Clause in SW that is overbroad requires def to show what was seized under it

TX: State is obligated to reraise its issues in CoA to not default; here, they defaulted

The state was obligated to argue its alternative theory to the court of appeals after winning in the trial court or it defaults the appellate argument. Here, it did just that. State v. Copeland, 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1195 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on TX: State is obligated to reraise its issues in CoA to not default; here, they defaulted

N.D.Ga.: Officer was credible on search 9 years ago by admitting what he couldn’t remember

The consent search in this case was nine years before the suppression hearing. The officer’s willingness to admit that which he could not remember made him more credible, and it was expected he couldn’t remember all of it because it … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Officer was credible on search 9 years ago by admitting what he couldn’t remember

MS: Guilty plea waived 4A claim

Defendant’s guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. Singleton v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 637 (Oct. 4, 2016). Defendant’s claim that the police withheld information about an alleged drug dog alert. That claim was either procedurally barred or unsupported … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on MS: Guilty plea waived 4A claim

AR: Apparent scrivener’s error in the PC went uncorrected and became speculation

Search warrant was issued February 5, 2015 and showed the date of defendant’s alleged drug dealing as November 4-5, 2015. Whether it was a typo that should have been 2014, or should have been February 4-5, 2015 (which was speculative … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on AR: Apparent scrivener’s error in the PC went uncorrected and became speculation

MO: When def relies on traffic stop cases, she has to show when reasonable suspicion was required

Defendant relies on traffic stop cases, so it’s incumbent on her to show that at what point the consensual stop transformed into a stop governed by the Fourth Amendment requiring at least reasonable suspicion. State v. Marr, 2016 Mo. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: When def relies on traffic stop cases, she has to show when reasonable suspicion was required

CA9: Defense entitled to discovery on whether San Clemente immigration checkpoint also now a general crime control checkpoint

Defendant sought discovery to show that the San Clemente immigration checkpoint on I-5, sustained 40 years ago in Martinez-Fuerte, had also become a general crime control checkpoint, and the district court denied it. The Court of Appeals held that Rule … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on CA9: Defense entitled to discovery on whether San Clemente immigration checkpoint also now a general crime control checkpoint

N.D.Ga.: Statement at arrest car was girlfriend’s didn’t show standing; more required

Defendant’s post-arrest statement to the police that the car was his girlfriend’s wasn’t enough to show standing. He could have testified to standing without being cross-examined about the merits of the car, yet he didn’t. Defendant’s statement before arrest that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Statement at arrest car was girlfriend’s didn’t show standing; more required

DE: When state shows PC in forfeiture proceeding, burden shifts to def

This case involves a return of property petition and the state sought forfeiture. The probable cause standard for forfeiture is essentially the same at that applied in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases. Thus, the State is required to prove … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Forfeiture, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on DE: When state shows PC in forfeiture proceeding, burden shifts to def

OH8: Video belied testimony about stop; suppression should have been granted

The trooper testified that defendant swerved within lanes, but it was not supported by the video and defendant wasn’t even cited for that. Thus, the motion to suppress should have been granted. City of Cleveland v. Shevchenko, 2016-Ohio-5711, 2016 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Video belied testimony about stop; suppression should have been granted

S.D.Ga.: General motion to suppress inadequate and denied

Defendant’s motion merely alleging he was subjected to a warrantless search is too general to mean a thing. United States v. Bostic, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115636 (S.D.Ga. Aug. 29, 2016):

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: General motion to suppress inadequate and denied

D.Neb.: Information for Franks hearing needs to be made to USMJ, not on appeal to USDJ

When making a Franks challenge to the USMJ, defendant must come forward with the information then, not on the request for review to the USDJ. “The Magistrate Judge did not state on the record his specific reasoning for a finding … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Information for Franks hearing needs to be made to USMJ, not on appeal to USDJ