Category Archives: DNA

NYTimes: The Cold Case That Inspired the ‘Golden State Killer’ Detective to Try Genealogy

NYTimes: The Cold Case That Inspired the ‘Golden State Killer’ Detective to Try Genealogy by Tim Arango: Before investigators in California say they solved a decades-old case of rape and murder using a genealogy website, the only other known case … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NYTimes: The Cold Case That Inspired the ‘Golden State Killer’ Detective to Try Genealogy

D.Colo.: Additional DNA sample and fingerprints despite the fact the govt already has it

The court can order an additional DNA sample and fingerprints despite the fact the government already has it. United States v. Lovato, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71592 (D. Colo. Apr. 30, 2018). Collateral estoppel doesn’t apply to a suppression order … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Additional DNA sample and fingerprints despite the fact the govt already has it

AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man

AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man by Michael Balsamo and Jonathan J. Cooper with Frank Stoltze:

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AP: Earlier search for Golden State Killer led to wrong man

Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy

Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy by Ronald Bailey “Any right of privacy in commercial DNA testers?” This was inevitable.

Posted in DNA, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reason.com: The Golden State Killer and Your Genetic Privacy

NH: Warrantless DNA testing of blood obtained from hospital if error was harmless

Defendant was driving in a car crash that critically injured him and his passenger. He came to the ER, and the hospital drew five vials of blood for diagnostic testing for his condition. At the hearing all that it would … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NH: Warrantless DNA testing of blood obtained from hospital if error was harmless

Cal.: Cal.’s initiated DNA act constitutionally requires DNA sampling from those charged with serious felonies

California’s initiated DNA collection act requiring DNA sampling of those charged with serious felonies applies to defendant’s arson arrest. He refused to provide a sample on booking and was convicted of a misdemeanor offense. The California statute is not exactly … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Cal.: Cal.’s initiated DNA act constitutionally requires DNA sampling from those charged with serious felonies

D.D.C.: It doesn’t violate Franks to fail to mention a Miranda violation to gain def’s admissions (no violatIon either)

Officers had probable cause for a warrantless arrest of defendant for child pornography. “But Mr. Lieu argues that the names ‘Dave’ and ‘John’ are relatively common names and that the clothing description is too general to support the connection that … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It doesn’t violate Franks to fail to mention a Miranda violation to gain def’s admissions (no violatIon either)

D.S.D.: 4A permits taking DNA on booking from misdemeanor defendants

Defendant, a sovereign citizen, indicted for willful failure to file tax returns, when booked by the U.S. Marshal refused to be fingerprinted, photographed, or have a DNA sample taken because they were “copyrighted.” He relented as to fingerprinting and photographing … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on D.S.D.: 4A permits taking DNA on booking from misdemeanor defendants

Law Review: Government Analysis of Shed DNA Is a Search under the Fourth Amendment

Government Analysis of Shed DNA Is a Search under the Fourth Amendment by Tracey Maclin, Boston Univeristy School of Law, 48 Texas Tech Law Review 287 (2015) (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2685766). Abstract:

Posted in DNA, Search | Comments Off on Law Review: Government Analysis of Shed DNA Is a Search under the Fourth Amendment

D.N.M.: There was at least circumstantial evidence defs’ DNA would be found in evidence to justify SW for it

There was sufficient probable cause defendants were involved in a robbery and could be linked to evidence in the case for DNA samples to be taken from them by search warrants. “Although the Search Warrant lacks direct evidence that the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: There was at least circumstantial evidence defs’ DNA would be found in evidence to justify SW for it

CA1: No RS for a protective sweep just because def was suspected of drugs

The government had no evidence of violence or reason to believe that there was anybody else in the apartment to justify a protective sweep. The crime alone, suspected drug trafficking, didn’t provide it. United States v. Delgado-Pérez, 2017 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: No RS for a protective sweep just because def was suspected of drugs

D.Nev.: Nighttime search clause in SW moot where search was during day

Police showed probable cause for a DNA search warrant in an effort to connect defendant to an armed robbery. The warrant had a nighttime search clause. Since this all happened during daylight hours, any issues with the nighttime clause are … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Nighttime search clause in SW moot where search was during day

LA4: No right to a Miranda warning when consent sought for DNA swab

Taking DNA by a buccal swab is a search, but defendant doesn’t have a right to a Miranda warning when consent is sought. State v. Cooper, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1211 (La.App. 4 Cir. July 5, 2017). The seizure of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, DNA, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on LA4: No right to a Miranda warning when consent sought for DNA swab

GA: Minor didn’t consent to DUI blood draw

The trial court’s finding that a minor’s consent to a blood draw was invalid is affirmed on appeal. The trooper signed the consent form for him. In the Interest of C.W., 2017 Ga. App. LEXIS 329 (June 28, 2017).* Late … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA | Comments Off on GA: Minor didn’t consent to DUI blood draw

LA2: Reasonable possibility respondent was father was enough to order DNA test in face of 4A objection

Respondent was the subject of a petition to establish paternity, and he claimed that the statute to order DNA testing required the Fourth Amendment be complied with. “Here, Rogers argues that in order to prove a reasonable possibility of paternity, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA, Probable cause | Comments Off on LA2: Reasonable possibility respondent was father was enough to order DNA test in face of 4A objection

OK: Def counsel not constitutionally required to be notified of DNA SW after prosecution began

A search warrant was obtained for defendant’s DNA after he was represented. The affidavit showed probable cause, and there was no requirement to advise defense counsel of the search warrant before execution. Frederick v. State, 2017 OK CR 12, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OK: Def counsel not constitutionally required to be notified of DNA SW after prosecution began

PA: Once SW issues for clothes and DNA removed, no further warrant needed for DNA testing

DNA lawfully seized from defendant’s clothes did not require a separate warrant to test it. Defendant doesn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his victim’s DNA on him. Once DNA is lawfully taken, there is no longer any reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: Once SW issues for clothes and DNA removed, no further warrant needed for DNA testing

N.D.Ga.: The Franks doctrine applies only to factual misstatements, not legal conclusions

Following United States v. Barnes, 126 F. Supp. 3d 735, 740 (E.D. La. 2015), the Franks doctrine applies only to factual misstatements, not legal conclusions. United States v. Tabares, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186540 (N.D.Ga. June 3, 2016), adopted, 2017 … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The Franks doctrine applies only to factual misstatements, not legal conclusions

E.D.N.Y.: Def objection to new saliva sample by SW denied

Defendant pro se opposed the taking of a new saliva sample. For some reason, the government applied for and obtained a new warrant for saliva having determined that the prior sample was too old or insufficient. The taking of the … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def objection to new saliva sample by SW denied

WaPo: Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill

WaPo: Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill by Lena H. Sun: Employers could impose hefty penalties on employees who decline to participate in genetic testing as part of workplace wellness programs if a bill approved … Continue reading

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on WaPo: Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill