Category Archives: § 1983 / Bivens

N.D.Ind.: Ptf’s 4A claim wasn’t sufficiently articulated to state a claim

“Mr. Ryan also alleges that there wasn’t any ‘adversarial pursuit of the Fourth Amendment’s protection of privacy can not be invalidated simply because a person’s right to want to be private evidences unlawful activity because the person does not want … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Ptf’s 4A claim wasn’t sufficiently articulated to state a claim

E.D.Pa.: State court’s suppression of evidence is a fact question for trial on underlying facts and findings and not preclusive

Plaintiff was charged in state court with possession, and the state court credited his version over that of the officers on the basis for the stop because their testimony was contradictory and confusing. Still, that doesn’t have preclusive effect in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: State court’s suppression of evidence is a fact question for trial on underlying facts and findings and not preclusive

CA3 notes inventory policy not in evidence supporting § 1983 judgment and affirms

In a Fourth Amendment § 1983 case tried to a jury, the claim of an unreasonable inventory search prevailed before the jury. Yet, there was no written policy put into evidence by the parties. Affirmed on this ground. Watley v. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3 notes inventory policy not in evidence supporting § 1983 judgment and affirms

CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

“Heck bars Mr. Hooks from recovering damages based on the first four alleged uses of force. Mr. Hooks’s no contest plea to two counts of assault and battery of a police officer means he admitted repeatedly hitting the officers before … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Heck bars excessive force claim where it attacks ptf’s guilty plea

IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped for a seat belt violation. The driver had no DL and he was handcuffed. While waiting for transport of the driver, the arresting officer engaged him in conversation. This was reasonable and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Conversation with passenger while waiting for transport for arrested driver didn’t extend the stop

CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

Congress has to determine the scope of Bivens, and the court declines to extend it to a false arrest case involving a “rogue officer” alleged to have fabricated evidence in sex crime prosecutions. “This appeal is another chapter in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

The officer prepared an affidavit and search warrant for a vehicle search and took the paperwork to a state judge. They forgot to get the warrant signed. The search was still valid because there was probable cause to search the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

The district court erred in summarily dismissing plaintiff’s case at § 1915A screening for failure to state a claim, because he did in the attempted amended complaint. “Edwards alleged that Rice lacked a search warrant when she conducted an investigation … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on CA3: Pro se ptf stated claim for warrantless entry into his house

NE: Search of def’s car valid under automobile exception where he was late for third controlled buy

When defendant didn’t show up for his third controlled buy, police went to him and searched his car finding the drugs. They had probable cause for that search under the automobile exception. State v. Garza, 29 Neb. App. 223 (Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on NE: Search of def’s car valid under automobile exception where he was late for third controlled buy

CA5: Temporary guest on property had no standing on the curtilage

A temporary guest on the property had no standing in the curtilage. Even so, the officer’s merely looking in his vehicle and seeing Sudafed in plain view wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. “It is undisputed that Carr had been inside … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Temporary guest on property had no standing on the curtilage

NY: Reversal for 4A violation isn’t “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claim

Reversal because of a Fourth Amendment violation isn’t a “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claims. Butler v. City of New York, 2020 NY Slip Op 33363(U), 2020 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 10130 (N.Y. Co. Oct. 14, 2020) (Martinez v. City of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: Reversal for 4A violation isn’t “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claim

CA5: Hitting a man on ground in fetal position 26 times stated claim

Allegations of police beating a man 26 times lying in the fetal position was enough to overcome qualified immunity. “Though Joseph was not suspected of committing any crime, was in the fetal position, and was not actively resisting, Officers Martin … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Hitting a man on ground in fetal position 26 times stated claim

CA9: Bivens could be extended to excessive force and 1A retaliation claim against CBP officer

Bivens could be extended to a Fourth Amendment illegal entry and excessive force claim and First Amendment retaliation by the CBP agent by reporting plaintiff to the IRS. Boule v. Egbert, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36559 (9th Cir. Nov. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA9: Bivens could be extended to excessive force and 1A retaliation claim against CBP officer

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason by Jacob Sullum:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Reason: SCOTUS Considers Whether James King Has Any Recourse Against the Cops Who Choked and Beat Him for No Good Reason

KS: Looking in purse of unconscious driver was reasonable

The emergency aid exception applied: “Officer Brown searched Smith’s purse seeking Smith’s identity and any information that would explain the nature of Smith’s condition and the best means of treating it. When the officer made this decision, the paramedics were … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on KS: Looking in purse of unconscious driver was reasonable

CA8: Negative patdown didn’t remove threat when ptf reached for waistband and was shot

Plaintiff was patted down (it appears more of a full search incident) and then fled and reached for his waistband and was shot. A gun was overlooked in the patdown. “We therefore conclude that Officer Ashcraft is entitled to summary … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Negative patdown didn’t remove threat when ptf reached for waistband and was shot

CA5: Dist.Ct. erred in dismissing civil claim ptf never saw 32 pg attachment to SW

One of plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims was that the 32 page attachment limiting the scope of the search warrant was not attached, and he still hadn’t seen it. The district court erred in dismissing the claim without the plaintiff seeing … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA5: Dist.Ct. erred in dismissing civil claim ptf never saw 32 pg attachment to SW

E.D.N.Y.: Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases in CA2

The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases in the Second Circuit. Therefore, illegally seized evidence can be considered for probable cause to arrest. Smith v. Degirolamo, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176310 (E.D. N.Y. Sept. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases in CA2

TX4: Illegal stop claim was waived for failure to present to trial court

Defendant’s illegal stop claim for having an open container in San Antonio wasn’t presented in the trial court so it’s waived. Sowers v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 7473 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sept. 16, 2020).* “This Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on TX4: Illegal stop claim was waived for failure to present to trial court

CA10: Ptf didn’t have to show officer his ID and that wasn’t PC for arrest

“Mglej’s refusal to provide Deputy Gardner with his driver’s license or some other form of identification, then, as Deputy Gardner demanded, did not create probable cause to arrest Mglej under Utah Code § 76-8-301.5(1). Thus, sufficient to defeat summary judgment, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Ptf didn’t have to show officer his ID and that wasn’t PC for arrest