Category Archives: Qualified immunity

TX4: Anonymous tip of a minor city code violation didn’t support stop, so consent invalid

An anonymous tip that defendant was selling stuff from her car allegedly without a proper city permit didn’t justify defendant’s stop. Her subsequent consent was invalid. Pineda v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8824 (Tex. App. – San Antonio August … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX4: Anonymous tip of a minor city code violation didn’t support stop, so consent invalid

E.D.Cal.: Police deleting ptf’s computer file of police searching probationer’s home violates First Amendment

A police officer violated plaintiff’s First Amendment rights when he took her computer while she was recording their search of her house. No qualified immunity: If a citizen has a right to record the police in public, they sure do … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Police deleting ptf’s computer file of police searching probationer’s home violates First Amendment

OK: Under collective knowledge, arresting officer doesn’t need all the details

Under the collective knowledge doctrine, all the details don’t have to be passed on to the arresting officer to make the arrest legal. State v. Iven, 2014 OK CR 8; 2014 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 7 (July 25, 2014). Plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OK: Under collective knowledge, arresting officer doesn’t need all the details

S.D.Cal.: Reasonable suspicion supported border search of 5 cell phones

Officers had reasonable suspicion that defendant was involved in alien smuggling when she crossed the border at San Ysidro. When she was sent for secondary inspection, the five cell phones she had could be searched under Cotterman. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Reasonable suspicion supported border search of 5 cell phones

IN: Completely unjustified frisk suppressed

The officer in this case received word that defendant was a drug dealer, so he went around looking for defendant. He saw the defendant a couple of times but nothing was unusual or suggested a crime. Then he initiated a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Completely unjustified frisk suppressed

CA11: No exigency present on a domestic call to justify warrantless entry into home

No reasonable officer could conclude on these facts that there was exigency for a warrantless entry. There was no evidence that actual violence was occurring or threatened. Therefore, qualified immunity was denied. Walters v. Freeman, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13540 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: No exigency present on a domestic call to justify warrantless entry into home

CA11: Tasering armed man out of a tree where he broke his back entitled to QI

Plaintiff was drunk in a tree with a gun after an altercation at a party. The police came and he refused to some down. He was Tasered twice, the second time falling headfirst eight feet and becoming a paraplegic. The … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Tasering armed man out of a tree where he broke his back entitled to QI

D.Kan.: RS on totality here was weak and motion to suppress granted

“Although a close call, the Court concludes that the trooper did not have reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot and had no right to detain Medina for further investigation. Though reasonable suspicion is not meant to be an onerous … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: RS on totality here was weak and motion to suppress granted

CA5: When qualified immunity is the issue, whether the 4A was violated isn’t even the “ultimate question”

Police received a 911 call that plaintiff’s son was a schizophrenic threatening death or certain injury. They came to her house, and she denied that he was there, but pleaded for help for him because he refused to take his … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: When qualified immunity is the issue, whether the 4A was violated isn’t even the “ultimate question”

Three § 1983 cases: CA10: No PC for search, no good faith for officer relying on another’s conclusion of PC

Plaintiff was stopped for speeding and “perceived inconsistencies” in her story led to a request to search, her refusal, and then her two hour detention, drug dog and car search. No drugs were found. There was no probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Three § 1983 cases: CA10: No PC for search, no good faith for officer relying on another’s conclusion of PC

TX4: No reasonable expectation of privacy in public official’s emails

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public office holder’s official email accounts under the state public records act. Quon is distinguished, and the email policies show no expectation of privacy. Adkisson v. Abbott, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX4: No reasonable expectation of privacy in public official’s emails

CA6: Malicious prosecution claim fails where no false testimony before GJ

Plaintiff’s grand jury indictment was sufficient probable cause to defeat a malicious prosecution claim. Plaintiff cannot show that the officer testified falsely or with reckless disregard for the truth before the grand jury. Robertson v. Lucas, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Malicious prosecution claim fails where no false testimony before GJ

SCOTUS: Deadly force to stop this high-speed car chase was reasonable as a matter of law; alternatively, officers get qualified immunity

Deadly force used to stop this high-speed car chase was reasonable as a matter of law. The number of shots is not determinative (12) as long as the risk is apparent. Alternatively, the officers get qualified immunity because the law … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Deadly force to stop this high-speed car chase was reasonable as a matter of law; alternatively, officers get qualified immunity

CA11: Warrantless entry to arrest on reasonable suspicion violates clearly established law; officers denied qualified immunity

A warrantless entry to arrest on reasonable suspicion violates clearly established law of the presumption of invalidity of a warrantless entry, and the officers are denied qualified immunity. Morris v. Town of Lexington Ala., 748 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2014)*: … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Warrantless entry to arrest on reasonable suspicion violates clearly established law; officers denied qualified immunity

New Law Review Article: Qualified Immunity and Statutory Interpretation

Qualified Immunity and Statutory Interpretation, Ilan Wurman, 37 Seattle Univ. L. R. 939 (2014). Abstract: Before the 1989 case of Graham v. Connor, excessive force cases were pursued under either state law or the insuperable “shocks the conscience” test of … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Qualified Immunity and Statutory Interpretation

CA6: Passing the BAC test doesn’t mean the stop was illegal

The officer here had probable cause to stop plaintiff for an illegal lane change shown on the dashcam video. Plaintiff smelled of alcohol and there was probable cause for arrest. The fact he passed the BAC test didn’t vitiate the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Passing the BAC test doesn’t mean the stop was illegal

CA3: Knock-and-talk at back door violated curtilage and Fourth Amendment

The knock and talk exception only applies to the front door. If the officer goes to the back door first, the knock and talk exception doesn’t apply. The officer’s entry onto the curtilage here was a violation of the curtilage … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Knock-and-talk at back door violated curtilage and Fourth Amendment

WaPo: Despite court rulings, people are still getting arrested for recording on-duty cops

WaPo: Despite court rulings, people are still getting arrested for recording on-duty cops by Radley Balko The latest incident comes from Massachusetts. And, since the courts are uniform on this, there will be no qualified immunity for such an arrest.

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Despite court rulings, people are still getting arrested for recording on-duty cops

CA9: Mistaken stop on Automatic License Plate Reader gets no qualified immunity

Plaintiff was subject to an erroneous felony stop because of a hit by an Automatic License Plate Reader. Summary judgment of her § 1983 claim on qualified immunity for false arrest and excessive force was reversed, and the case sent … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Mistaken stop on Automatic License Plate Reader gets no qualified immunity

CA7: Warrantless entry to seize a mental health patient 9 hrs after Dr’s call wasn’t exigent, but qualified immunity applies

A police entry to seize a person and her guns 9 hours after a doctor’s call she was a danger to herself or others was kind of “exigent,” but nevertheless treated as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Still, qualified … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Warrantless entry to seize a mental health patient 9 hrs after Dr’s call wasn’t exigent, but qualified immunity applies