Category Archives: Qualified immunity

SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

Officers didn’t go to the front door for a knock-and-announce and they didn’t anybody. The law was not clearly established at the time. The homeowner sued under § 1983. SCOTUS per curiam grants the officers qualified immunity without full briefing. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Knock and talk, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on SCOTUS per curiam decides a not front door knock-and-talk on qualified immunity

CA3: Where search was limited, alleged overbreadth of SW was less important

The affidavit for the search warrant showed probable cause, so the search can’t be suppressed. Moreover, the officer acted reasonably and gets qualified immunity. The search itself wasn’t as broad as the warrant was argued to allow, so the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Where search was limited, alleged overbreadth of SW was less important

CA2: Entry into curtilage and shooting family dog in front of child not based on exigency

Officers entered the curtilage without a warrant or exigent circumstances and shot plaintiff’s dog in front of his 12 year old daughter. The verdict for the defendant officers is reversed and remanded for trial because they didn’t show reasons for … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Entry into curtilage and shooting family dog in front of child not based on exigency

CA5: Threatened suicide is exigency

A threatened suicide is an exigent circumstance for an entry, following other circuits. Rice v. Reliastar Life Ins. Co., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20581 (5th Cir. October 27, 2014): The Rice Plaintiffs argue that the exigent circumstances exception to the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Threatened suicide is exigency

CA9: No qualified immunity to handcuffing ADHD child who wouldn’t leave school grounds

Officers were entitled to qualified immunity with regard to an unconstitutional seizure of a minor child with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder who was sitting quietly but was unresponsive and refused to leave a school playground, since a reasonable officer would … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Police misconduct, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: No qualified immunity to handcuffing ADHD child who wouldn’t leave school grounds

CA8: Arguable PC means qualified immunity against false arrest

There was arguable probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest, so the officers get qualified immunity. Trevino v. Benton County, Arkansas, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19166 (8th Cir. October 8, 2014).* The police obtained separate search warrants for marijuana and a cell … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Arguable PC means qualified immunity against false arrest

CA11: Arguable PC for arrest gives qualified immunity

Arguable probable cause for a warrantless arrest and then a valid search warrant gives qualified immunity to the officers involved. Ultimately the DA decided not to prosecute the plaintiffs, and it was a close case for prosecution. Roddy v. City … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable PC for arrest gives qualified immunity

CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

“We have repeatedly ruled that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment, and is denied qualified immunity, if he or she uses gratuitous and excessive force against a suspect who is under control, not resisting, and obeying commands. See, e.g., … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer denied qualified immunity for slamming passive arrestee to pavement

CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

Plaintiff in this § 1983 case was a lawyer entering the Fulton County Courthouse. She put her briefcase and purse on the conveyor belt for the x-ray machine, but she set off the metal detector. She was instructed to take … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Courthouse security guard denied qualified immunity for twisting arm of a female lawyer on the phone

CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

“We must decide whether a suspicionless roving automobile stop of commercial fishers made while they drive on a public highway to investigate compliance with Washington fish and game laws constitutes an unreasonable search and seizure within the meaning of the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: A roving game warden stop not a proper administrative search

CA2: Whether to employ a SWAT team entitled to qualified immunity; rest of raid not

The decision to employ a SWAT team is subject to qualified immunity, but the actions that follow here aren’t. The raid here was overkill [my word], and the officers do not get qualified immunity for how it was conducted because … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Whether to employ a SWAT team entitled to qualified immunity; rest of raid not

TX4: Anonymous tip of a minor city code violation didn’t support stop, so consent invalid

An anonymous tip that defendant was selling stuff from her car allegedly without a proper city permit didn’t justify defendant’s stop. Her subsequent consent was invalid. Pineda v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8824 (Tex. App. – San Antonio August … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX4: Anonymous tip of a minor city code violation didn’t support stop, so consent invalid

E.D.Cal.: Police deleting ptf’s computer file of police searching probationer’s home violates First Amendment

A police officer violated plaintiff’s First Amendment rights when he took her computer while she was recording their search of her house. No qualified immunity: If a citizen has a right to record the police in public, they sure do … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Police deleting ptf’s computer file of police searching probationer’s home violates First Amendment

OK: Under collective knowledge, arresting officer doesn’t need all the details

Under the collective knowledge doctrine, all the details don’t have to be passed on to the arresting officer to make the arrest legal. State v. Iven, 2014 OK CR 8; 2014 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 7 (July 25, 2014). Plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on OK: Under collective knowledge, arresting officer doesn’t need all the details

S.D.Cal.: Reasonable suspicion supported border search of 5 cell phones

Officers had reasonable suspicion that defendant was involved in alien smuggling when she crossed the border at San Ysidro. When she was sent for secondary inspection, the five cell phones she had could be searched under Cotterman. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Border search, Cell phones, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Reasonable suspicion supported border search of 5 cell phones

IN: Completely unjustified frisk suppressed

The officer in this case received word that defendant was a drug dealer, so he went around looking for defendant. He saw the defendant a couple of times but nothing was unusual or suggested a crime. Then he initiated a … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Completely unjustified frisk suppressed

CA11: No exigency present on a domestic call to justify warrantless entry into home

No reasonable officer could conclude on these facts that there was exigency for a warrantless entry. There was no evidence that actual violence was occurring or threatened. Therefore, qualified immunity was denied. Walters v. Freeman, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13540 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: No exigency present on a domestic call to justify warrantless entry into home

CA11: Tasering armed man out of a tree where he broke his back entitled to QI

Plaintiff was drunk in a tree with a gun after an altercation at a party. The police came and he refused to some down. He was Tasered twice, the second time falling headfirst eight feet and becoming a paraplegic. The … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Tasering armed man out of a tree where he broke his back entitled to QI

D.Kan.: RS on totality here was weak and motion to suppress granted

“Although a close call, the Court concludes that the trooper did not have reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot and had no right to detain Medina for further investigation. Though reasonable suspicion is not meant to be an onerous … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: RS on totality here was weak and motion to suppress granted

CA5: When qualified immunity is the issue, whether the 4A was violated isn’t even the “ultimate question”

Police received a 911 call that plaintiff’s son was a schizophrenic threatening death or certain injury. They came to her house, and she denied that he was there, but pleaded for help for him because he refused to take his … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: When qualified immunity is the issue, whether the 4A was violated isn’t even the “ultimate question”