Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA5: Ptf loses on his civil Franks claim because of a lack of materiality to PC

The affidavit for arrest warrant failed to include information that would undermine the credibility of the police informant, but the court finds that the omission was not material and there was other information that supported probable cause. Therefore, the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf loses on his civil Franks claim because of a lack of materiality to PC

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby, 15-1485 (Jan. 19, 2017). Issues: (1) Whether police officers who found late-night partiers inside a vacant home belonging to someone else had probable cause to arrest the partiers for trespassing under the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert.granted: District of Columbia v. Wesby on qualified immunity

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure

New law review article: Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?

William Baude, Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?. Abstract:

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on New law review article: Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?

CA6: Factual disputes deny appellate jurisdiction for excessive force qualified immunity appeal

There were disputes of fact on plaintiff’s excessive force claim that deprived this court of appellate jurisdiction over it. Harmon v. Hamilton County, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 497 (6th Cir. Jan. 9, 2017)*:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Factual disputes deny appellate jurisdiction for excessive force qualified immunity appeal

D.Md.: Extended border search from customs at JFK to locked warehouse in Maryland

The extended border search doctrine applied to a package shipped from China through customs at JFK and then to a warehouse in Bowie, Maryland. It was under lock and key, even on the truck, from customs to the warehouse where … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Md.: Extended border search from customs at JFK to locked warehouse in Maryland

CA8: Visitor at apt complex can’t claim standing in parking lot as alleged curtilage

Defendant didn’t have standing to claim that police entry into an apartment building’s parking lot was entry onto the curtilage because he didn’t live there. [It’s not curtilage anyway.] A cousin did, and he was an occasional visitor. Officers shining … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Visitor at apt complex can’t claim standing in parking lot as alleged curtilage

AK: Reconsideration of finding of no PC granted; def never really put lack of PC in issue

At issue was a seizure and then warranted search of defendant’s cell phone looking for an incriminating text message that was already seen by the police on the recipient’s cell phone. At the hearing, the Superior Court granted a motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AK: Reconsideration of finding of no PC granted; def never really put lack of PC in issue

CA6: Shooting dogs during drug raid was a seizure, but here it was reasonable

Officers executing a high risk warrant on plaintiff’s house shot and killed two pit bulls, one of which was standing in a corner of the basement not yet attacking. The warrant was considered high risk because the target of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting dogs during drug raid was a seizure, but here it was reasonable

CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

Officers have no qualified immunity for an arrest for disorderly conduct that was obviously without probable cause, and no reasonable officer could have concluded otherwise. Catledge v. City of Chicago, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22118 (7th Cir. Dec. 13, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Arrest for disorderly conduct was clearly without PC, so officers get no qualified immunity

CA9 (en banc): Where exigency for CPS worker to take child wasn’t really clear at time, she gets qualified immunity

At the time of this seizure of an infant from the parents in 2008, it was clearly established that child protection workers could not remove children from the parents without a warrant or exigency, but not something like these facts … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9 (en banc): Where exigency for CPS worker to take child wasn’t really clear at time, she gets qualified immunity

CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity

Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity, here for a mental health seizure. May v. City of Nahunta, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), same result on rehearing, May v. City of Nahunta, 2017 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA11: Arguable probable cause entitles the officer to qualified immunity

CA10: Bee inspector gets QI for search of apiary apparently in open field and because of unsettled questions of law

Utah bee inspector gets qualified immunity for the administrative inspection of plaintiff’s apiary because of unsettled questions, the fact the apiary was in open fields, and the lack of clearly established law. Cox v. Cache County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Open fields, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Bee inspector gets QI for search of apiary apparently in open field and because of unsettled questions of law

CA11: Police get QI for entry on a civil assist to recover property from former lover’s house

Police officers had qualified immunity for entry into plaintiff’s home with his estranged lover who came back with the police to assist to recover her belongings. Plaintiff’s guns were seized because he was under a domestic abuse injunction to not … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Police get QI for entry on a civil assist to recover property from former lover’s house

W.D.Ark.: “it was not clearly established that the inspection of legal materials during a shakedown violates the inmate’s clearly established constitutional rights”

“[I]t was not clearly established that the inspection of legal materials during a shakedown violates the inmate’s clearly established constitutional rights.” Knox v. Livermore, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130485 (W.D.Ark. June 2, 2016). Defendant’s consent three minutes into the stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: “it was not clearly established that the inspection of legal materials during a shakedown violates the inmate’s clearly established constitutional rights”

CA8: Officer taking custody after citizen’s arrest did not violate clearly established law

An officer received a report of a disorderly misdemeanor in progress and arrived to see part of it. While the facts were conflicting, there was still probable cause for the arrest. The law of citizen’s arrest is not so obvious … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Common law, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Officer taking custody after citizen’s arrest did not violate clearly established law

SC: Destruction of innocent’s building to end hostage situation not inverse condemnation so no recovery

The City of Spartanburg ended a hostage situation in a convenience store by using a bulldozer to breach a wall. After it was over, the owner couldn’t afford to fix it, so the city condemned it and tore it down. … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on SC: Destruction of innocent’s building to end hostage situation not inverse condemnation so no recovery

CA3: Officers did not ignore plainly exculpatory evidence in seeking a warrant for defendant’s arrest; QI applies

Plaintiff sued for false imprisonment based on his arrest held without probable cause by the state court. The district court denied qualified immunity, and the officers appealed. The officers did not ignore plainly exculpatory evidence, and, on the whole, there … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Officers did not ignore plainly exculpatory evidence in seeking a warrant for defendant’s arrest; QI applies

CA6: Jail takedown of DUI arrestee on video appears to be excessive force; QI denied

The video of plaintiff’s takedown in the jail on video certainly appears to be excessive force in violation of clearly established law. Denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity properly denied. Jennings v. Fuller, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16633 (6th … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Jail takedown of DUI arrestee on video appears to be excessive force; QI denied

CA11: QI denied for entry into house without exigency and Tasering plaintiff

Qualified immunity properly denied for entry into house without exigent circumstances and Tasering plaintiff. “Although George may have had arguable probable cause to arrest Bratt for battery, we cannot find that, as a matter of law, that George was permitted … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: QI denied for entry into house without exigency and Tasering plaintiff