Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

N.D.Ind.: Sound of a gun hitting the sidewalk was a factor in RS

Shots-fired call led to defendant’s patdown with reasonable suspicion, and it produced ammunition and a holster. “It was after dark, there were reports of gunshots, and in the immediate aftermath of those, there was a likelihood that an emergency was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Sound of a gun hitting the sidewalk was a factor in RS

MD: Officer had RS and consent for patdown

The officer had reasonable suspicion but he asked for consent to search defendant’s person for a weapon, which he granted. It was consensual on the totality. Defendant didn’t make a state constitutional argument in the trial court but did on … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on MD: Officer had RS and consent for patdown

techdirt: Appeals Court Bashes Predictive Policing And The Judge Who Argued People In High Crime Areas Want Fewer Rights

techdirt: Appeals Court Bashes Predictive Policing And The Judge Who Argued People In High Crime Areas Want Fewer Rights by Tim Cushing;

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on techdirt: Appeals Court Bashes Predictive Policing And The Judge Who Argued People In High Crime Areas Want Fewer Rights

KY declines to adopt a per se rule that a completed misdemeanor is not subject to a stop-and-frisk

Kentucky declines to adopt a per se rule that a completed misdemeanor is not subject to a stop-and-frisk because it is too difficult to apply in the field. K.H. v. Commonwealth, 2020 Ky. App. LEXIS 86 (July 24, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY declines to adopt a per se rule that a completed misdemeanor is not subject to a stop-and-frisk

CO: Traffic stop was objectively reasonable even though officer cited wrong statute

Defendant’s stop was objectively reasonable, even though the officer cited the wrong statute. People v. Ambrose, 2020 COA 112, 2020 Colo. App. LEXIS 1384 (July 23, 2020). “[W]e need not address Salas’s argument that a slight delay to conduct a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CO: Traffic stop was objectively reasonable even though officer cited wrong statute

N.D.Ohio: Patel doesn’t preclude motel operator’s consent

City of Los Angeles v. Patel not violated where motel owner voluntarily gives up information about renters. Jones v. Motel 6 Operating L.P., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122443 (N.D. Ohio July 13, 2020). Defendant’s traffic stop had basic questions that … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Patel doesn’t preclude motel operator’s consent

D.Ariz.: Nervousness alone can’t be RS

“Here, the Court finds that Trooper Amick did not have reasonable suspicion to extend the stop. Trooper Amick testified that he had asked for consent to search the vehicle because the conflicting stories by Mr. Gonzalez and Mr. Diaz indicated … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Nervousness alone can’t be RS

NC: Pocket knife on car console not RS to search

Pocket knife on the console of a defendant’s car was not reasonable suspicion to search his person. State v. Duncan, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 525 (July 7, 2020). Where initial stop was valid, smell of marijuana and defendant’s furtive movements … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Pocket knife on car console not RS to search

CA2: Failure to fully articulate 4A argument in brief is waiver

“Although Plaintiff references her Fourth Amendment claims against the unidentified police officers in her list of ‘questions presented,’ she makes no argument to support those claims in her brief. See Appellant Br. 2, 6-13. We therefore view these claims as … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to fully articulate 4A argument in brief is waiver

E.D.Ark.: If handcuffing on RS to maintain status quo wasn’t reasonable, it doesn’t make the vehicle search unreasonable

“[W]hile waiting for the drug dog to arrive, Morphis placed Gibbs in handcuffs. It’s not clear from this record that that was justified. … But Morphis had reasonable suspicion to extend the stop to wait for the drug dog; and … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: If handcuffing on RS to maintain status quo wasn’t reasonable, it doesn’t make the vehicle search unreasonable

CA3: Finding suspect near bank that was just robbed generally matching description but with short sleeves in winter was RS

“With respect to the issue of reasonable suspicion, this is a close case. Defendants were not wearing all of the clothing described in the dispatch or depicted on the surveillance video, and their reaction to the police vehicle could be … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA3: Finding suspect near bank that was just robbed generally matching description but with short sleeves in winter was RS

CA3 still doesn’t adopt standard of review for Franks challenges

The Third Circuit notes that it has yet to adopt a standard of review for Franks claims; see United States v. Pavulak, 700 F.3d 651, 665-66 (3d Cir. 2012); and it doesn’t have to here because, whichever applies, defendant loses. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA3 still doesn’t adopt standard of review for Franks challenges

E.D.Cal.: Question for Stone v. Powell is: does the state provide a mechanism for “full and fair litigation” of a 4A claim, not whether def took advantage of it

The question for Stone v. Powell is: does the state provide a mechanism for “full and fair litigation” of a Fourth Amendment claim, not whether defendant took advantage of it. Barrera v. Sherman, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118199 (E.D. Cal. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Question for Stone v. Powell is: does the state provide a mechanism for “full and fair litigation” of a 4A claim, not whether def took advantage of it

CA8: Officer approached who he thought was a crime victim and answers to questions gave RS he was the culprit

Officer responded to a call about shooting of a car thinking defendant might have been a victim. When he inquired, “Aguilar responded that he ‘didn’t shoot nobody’s windows out.’” Reasonable suspicion developed on the totality. United States v. Aguilar, 19-3008 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Officer approached who he thought was a crime victim and answers to questions gave RS he was the culprit

WI: Officer can ask about weapons and for consent in any traffic stop without extending it

In an ordinary traffic stop, an officer may ask about weapons and even seek a consent to search without reasonable suspicion and thus without extending the stop. State v. Brown, 2020 WI 63, 2020 Wisc. LEXIS 140 (July 3, 2020):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Officer can ask about weapons and for consent in any traffic stop without extending it

CA4: Tip describing man with a gun found a block away walking away was RS

Bystander’s tip that a black man in red pants and a black shirt had left a large fight at a West Virginia bar going east after having displayed a gun. A block away to the east, officers found defendant walking … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Tip describing man with a gun found a block away walking away was RS

D.Minn.: Late night stop, no DL, digital scale on floor is RS

This late night stop was reasonably extended because the driver didn’t have a DL on him and there appeared to be a digital scale on the floor. United States v. Henry, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115939 (D. Minn. May 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Late night stop, no DL, digital scale on floor is RS

CA5: Reasonable mistaken identification made stop reasonable

“In any event, even if it is assumed arguendo that an attempted seizure could in fact trigger the Fourth Amendment, Ferguson has failed to show that the attempt to detain him for an investigatory Terry stop was not supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Reasonable mistaken identification made stop reasonable

CA7: On the totality, RS was thin, up until def fled

“If these were all the facts, establishing reasonable suspicion might have been a close call for the officers. But Wilson’s unprovoked, headlong flight from police in a high-crime area put any lingering doubt to rest. Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: On the totality, RS was thin, up until def fled

E.D.N.Y.: Feeling apparent weapon during patdown allows officer to go inside clothing

Feeling a weapon during a patdown allows the officer to go beyond the outer clothing to retrieve it. United States v. Hightower, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112557 (E.D. N.Y. June 26, 2020). Defendant stopped his vehicle in an intersection where … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Feeling apparent weapon during patdown allows officer to go inside clothing