Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

FL4: Exigency required finding def’s cell phone to locate a school bus stop shooter

Exigent circumstances in finding a shooter at a school bus stop necessitated the officers pinging the cell phone to locate the shooter. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search because it would have failed. Barton v. State, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL4: Exigency required finding def’s cell phone to locate a school bus stop shooter

FL3: Warrantless blood test justified by exigency where it was 4:22 am Sunday and it would take 4 hours to get SW

Exigent circumstances justified a warrantless blood test because defendant’s accident occurred at approximately 4:22 a.m. on a Sunday, the accident was serious, resulting in an instantaneous death, defendant himself was seriously injured, taken to a hospital for treatment, and induced … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on FL3: Warrantless blood test justified by exigency where it was 4:22 am Sunday and it would take 4 hours to get SW

N.D.Iowa: Admissions about one’s own drug use to police during 911 call about unresponsive woman were RS

Police and EMTs responded to a 911 call about an unresponsive woman who later died. At the scene, admissions about defendant’s own drug abuse were made. “The court finds that the information about E.M.’s drug use, particularly when coupled with … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Admissions about one’s own drug use to police during 911 call about unresponsive woman were RS

NM: Trial court found truth between dashcam video and the testimony of the officer and the def; still entitled to deference on appeal

The trial court considered the dashcam and the officer’s and defendant’s testimony because the dashcam wasn’t conclusive: “But I think it just goes to show you really need to review the video in every case. And in this case, after … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standards of review | Comments Off on NM: Trial court found truth between dashcam video and the testimony of the officer and the def; still entitled to deference on appeal

D.Minn.: Def was a suspect in a stabbing, and police entered his property without a warrant claiming exigency; there was no exigency

Police came to defendant’s house because he was alleged to have stabbed somebody. They entered the curtilage without a warrant to look for evidence, and they found a bent bloody knife out in the rain. The warrantless entry was not … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def was a suspect in a stabbing, and police entered his property without a warrant claiming exigency; there was no exigency

OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

Defendant was initially stopped with information from a CI amounting to reasonable suspicion that he was purchasing precursors and ingredients to manufacture methamphetamine. When the police got to his house, it was apparent there was a working meth lab, and … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH5: Working meth lab is exigency

D.Utah: Officer-caused 2-sec traffic violation was not RS for stop

The officer’s probably unintentional causing of defendant’s traffic violation made the stop unreasonable. Even if the stop was reasonable, there was no reasonable suspicion for continuing it. United States v. Esteban, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211294 (D. Utah Dec. 22, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Officer-caused 2-sec traffic violation was not RS for stop

CA9: Failure to argue curtilage was violated in district court barred argument on appeal

Viewing photographs of the scene, the district court could conclude that the officers could see defendant with methamphetamine in his garage. “Tran did not argue below that the officers unlawfully entered the curtilage of Chong’s home and therefore waived this … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA9: Failure to argue curtilage was violated in district court barred argument on appeal

TX2: No exigency shown for warrantless blood draw in DUI case

The state failed to prove exigent circumstances for a warrantless blood draw from the defendant. There were other officers around and a warrant could have been sought. State v. Sanders, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 11674 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX2: No exigency shown for warrantless blood draw in DUI case

CA8: After exigency for entry abated, police had consent from def’s wife to remain on premises

Exigency supported the police entry into defendant’s home because of concern for safety of the children and a domestic dispute. After the entry and the abatement of the exigency, defendant’s wife consented to the officers staying in the house. United … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA8: After exigency for entry abated, police had consent from def’s wife to remain on premises

CA8: Domestic call and argument where def was reported armed justified warrantless entry

In a domestic dispute where the police were called, “The warrantless entry was justified by a legitimate and objectively reasonable concern for the safety of Christina Bak and the officers. They had information that Quarterman was making Christina Bak move … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Domestic call and argument where def was reported armed justified warrantless entry

S.D.Ga.: Def shooting victim’s clothes could be seized from ER floor as plain view or because of exigency

Defendant arrived at a hospital ER after he was shot. His clothing was cut off him and on the floor, and the officer’s seizure was valid because it was in plain view and had clear evidentiary value from blood and … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Def shooting victim’s clothes could be seized from ER floor as plain view or because of exigency

E.D.La.: Drive-by shooting led to emergency ping order which led to valid protective sweep

“Defendant lacks standing to challenge the sweep of Ms. Wells’ home. At best, Defendant was a frequent visitor to the home where he babysat children and worked on cars in the yard. Those limited connections to the home are insufficient … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Drive-by shooting led to emergency ping order which led to valid protective sweep

OH12: 911 call about overdose brought narcs and EMS; entry justified and plain view sustained

Defendant was making methamphetamine in his garage, and he overdosed on heroin. His mother found him and called 911. A narcotics officer arrived shortly before EMS, and he saw defendant on the floor with a used syringe near him. EMS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH12: 911 call about overdose brought narcs and EMS; entry justified and plain view sustained

D.Mass.: Def’s quibbling in a Franks challenge is insufficient: “I’m just a ‘drug dealer’ not a ‘drug trafficker.’”

Defendant is quibbling rather than making a bona fide Franks argument that he was arraigned 11 times not 10 on other drug cases and that he was a “drug trafficker” when he insists he is just a “drug dealer.” One … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def’s quibbling in a Franks challenge is insufficient: “I’m just a ‘drug dealer’ not a ‘drug trafficker.’”

CA6: 53 days after an occurrence is hardly exigent

Detroit has a stray dog problem and passed an ordinance in 2004. The ordinance allowed warrantless entries into yards to search for and seize dogs. The district court enjoined that, and the city did not appeal. On individual claims, an … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA6: 53 days after an occurrence is hardly exigent

OR: Exigency-based entry into house for DUI arrest requires proof of exigency, and here it was lacking

Here the officer entered defendant’s home in a DUI case to seize him for evidence of his intoxication. Exigency can permit an entry, but the state has the burden of proof on exigency, and here it failed to prove the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OR: Exigency-based entry into house for DUI arrest requires proof of exigency, and here it was lacking

PA: Screams that drowned out officer’s knocking led to exigent entry

“In this case, exigent circumstances justified the officers’ warrantless entry into Appellant’s house. The evidence adduced during the suppression hearing demonstrates that on the evening in question, police officers received reports of someone screaming, someone bleeding, and someone with a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on PA: Screams that drowned out officer’s knocking led to exigent entry

UT: Potentially missing 65 yo man led to welfare check entry of his house at insistence of his mother; “welfare check” entry valid

Defendant was 65, in ill-health, and his mother talked to him every day. When she hadn’t heard from him, she called the police to check on him. At the house, nobody answered the door, the lights were on, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on UT: Potentially missing 65 yo man led to welfare check entry of his house at insistence of his mother; “welfare check” entry valid

MA: Trial judge’s omission of significant facts made finding of no exigency error

The trial judge’s finding that there were no exigent circumstances is reversed. Her findings of fact omitted serious facts in support of exigency, and thus was clearly erroneous. Commonwealth v. Arias, 2017 Mass. App. LEXIS 148 (Nov. 9, 2017):

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: Trial judge’s omission of significant facts made finding of no exigency error