Category Archives: Probable cause

CA5: There is no “contemporaneity between the evidence supporting probable cause and the arrest.”

There is no “contemporaneity between the evidence supporting probable cause and the arrest.” It’s up to police discretion when to arrest. Essentially: Staleness doesn’t apply to PC for arrest. United States v. Clark, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7959 (5th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA5: There is no “contemporaneity between the evidence supporting probable cause and the arrest.”

CA3: Payton’s “reason to believe” language from Payton/Steagald amounts to probable cause, noting conflict

Payton’s “reason to believe” language from Payton/Steagald amounts to probable cause, such that officers who have an arrest warrant for a suspect have to show “probable cause” that the suspect resides at or is present at a particular address before … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Payton’s “reason to believe” language from Payton/Steagald amounts to probable cause, noting conflict

N.D.Fla.: FBI had PC there was CP on electronic storage media hidden in plastic bags in a woodpile

“[A]pplying the totality of the circumstances test the Court has little difficulty concluding there was sufficient probable cause to search the electronic storage media provided to the F.B.I. For starters, a simple examination of the items to be searched evidences … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: FBI had PC there was CP on electronic storage media hidden in plastic bags in a woodpile

D.Ariz.: Def’s apparently grabbing a package launched over the border fence was RS

Border Patrol officers at Nogales watching over the border saw a launching device to throw bundles over the border fence, and they tried to see where the packages landed to round them up. Defendant was seen matching the description of … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Def’s apparently grabbing a package launched over the border fence was RS

D.Neb.: Unusual traffic patterns at def’s house was probable cause of drug dealing

The unusual traffic patterns at defendant’s house led to probable cause to believe that the car leaving had drugs acquired inside. United States v. Hernandez-Ortiz, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49658 (D. Neb. March 8, 2016),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Unusual traffic patterns at def’s house was probable cause of drug dealing

IN: Smell of burnt MJ in a house isn’t PC to believe the occupant is a drug dealer

The smell of burnt marijuana during a search of house is not probable cause to believe that the house contains marijuana for distribution. While it might be in a car, it’s not for a house. Also, a key fob was … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: Smell of burnt MJ in a house isn’t PC to believe the occupant is a drug dealer

W.D.Ky.: Affidavit truly was “bare bones” on nexus, so no GFE

“It generalizes that ‘an individual’ may have information on his or her phone that connects him or her to a crime, co-defendants or victims, rather than specifically connecting Ramirez, the crime with which he was charged, or any known information … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Affidavit truly was “bare bones” on nexus, so no GFE

CA8: Protective sweep of a camper was reasonable because another was inside when def was arrested

Defendant was supposed to sell methamphetamine from his camper at a campsite to an undercover officer, but he declined, so the officer attempted to arrest him outside the camper on an outstanding warrant and he fled. He went to the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: Protective sweep of a camper was reasonable because another was inside when def was arrested

MD: Dog alert on a car for marijuana where 10g or less is a civil penalty still supports probable cause for a search of the car

Dog alert on a car for marijuana where 10g or less is a civil penalty still supports probable cause for a search of the car. Bowling v. State, 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 37 (March 31, 2016). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on MD: Dog alert on a car for marijuana where 10g or less is a civil penalty still supports probable cause for a search of the car

TX13: Police search of iPod didn’t exceed private search; warrant valid

Defendant worked at a DQ and he cleaned a bathroom. Later, another employee found an iPod in the bathroom, and turned it in to a supervisor. It was looked at to determine ownership, and it was locked up until the … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX13: Police search of iPod didn’t exceed private search; warrant valid

E.D.Ark.: Police received a tip of sex trafficking a minor; talking to the minor on the phone was PC

In a search of a hotel room and arrest for sex trafficking of a minor, officers talked to the minor by telephone and that was sufficient to provide probable cause without much need for corroboration. Here, there was a tip … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Police received a tip of sex trafficking a minor; talking to the minor on the phone was PC

CA5: Knock-and-talk on a fence’s warehouse was reasonable and led to consent and plain view

Officers did a knock-and-talk on a warehouse suspected of being a location for a fence to keep his stolen goods pending resale. The entry was supported by consent and was reasonable. United States v. Danhach, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4421 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: Knock-and-talk on a fence’s warehouse was reasonable and led to consent and plain view

IL: Flight from a stop that was without RS was RS itself, and def’s tossing drugs while fleeing was PC

Chicago officers got a call about three men with rifles, and they approached defendant’s parked car to inquire, with no particular reason to believe that the occupant was one of the men. Defendant fled the police, they gave chase, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: Flight from a stop that was without RS was RS itself, and def’s tossing drugs while fleeing was PC

TN: Passing the FST didn’t negate PC; bloodshot and watery eyes, smelled of alcohol, admitted to 3 beers

Passing the FST didn’t negate probable cause. The officer observed defendant speeding, and, when the officer approached defendant he smelled alcohol, defendant had bloodshot and watery eyes, and defendant told the officer he had consumed three beers. State v. Silva, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Passing the FST didn’t negate PC; bloodshot and watery eyes, smelled of alcohol, admitted to 3 beers

Cal.2d: Even if Civil Code § 56.26 on medical record privacy had been violated, evidence not excludable in medical disciplinary proceeding

Even if Civil Code § 56.26 on medical record privacy had been violated, it would not exclude evidence in a medical board proceeding for violating billing standards. The subpoena is enforced as limited by time period. Fett v. Medical Bd. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.2d: Even if Civil Code § 56.26 on medical record privacy had been violated, evidence not excludable in medical disciplinary proceeding

E.D.Mich.: Def was told he wasn’t under arrest but he could have been; search incident valid

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he was told he was being placed in handcuffs because the officer was unaware of who he was and that that did not mean he was going to jail. A patdown produced … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def was told he wasn’t under arrest but he could have been; search incident valid

E.D.Mich.: Still a private search even though police were kept informed of what was happening

Defendant’s phone and computer were subjected to a private search, albeit the searcher keeping the police informed what she was doing. She wasn’t a government agent. United States v. McCoy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20890 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 22, 2016). The … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Still a private search even though police were kept informed of what was happening

GA: Absent owner of car called by police consented against driver

Defendant was driving somebody else’s car and was stopped by the police. The police called the owner to get consent to search, and that was binding on the defendant. Also, he wasn’t there at the time. Gomillion v. State, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: Absent owner of car called by police consented against driver

N.D.Cal.: Guilt by association here clearly wasn’t enough for a cell phone and CSLI search warrant, and GFE doesn’t apply

The cell phone and CSLI warrant were truly lacking in probable cause as to defendant. There was but a passing reference to him in an effort to show guilt by association, and that clearly was not a sufficient showing of … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Guilt by association here clearly wasn’t enough for a cell phone and CSLI search warrant, and GFE doesn’t apply

E.D.Mich.: Being a “drug dealer” alone isn’t probable cause to search his house; more required, and it’s present

The fact defendant is a “drug dealer” alone isn’t probable cause to search his house. Coupled with him coming and going to drug deals is. United States v. Sewell, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15376 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 9, 2016). The government … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Being a “drug dealer” alone isn’t probable cause to search his house; more required, and it’s present