Category Archives: Warrant execution

techdirt: Cops: People In Their Own Homes Are In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Whenever A Cop Enters Unlawfully

techdirt: Cops: People In Their Own Homes Are In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Whenever A Cop Enters Unlawfully by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on techdirt: Cops: People In Their Own Homes Are In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Whenever A Cop Enters Unlawfully

NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

The small town police department that obtained the search warrant did not have its own entry team for safety. Using officers from other county and state agencies to assist didn’t violate the warrant. People v. Ward, 2019 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

The search warrant said that is should be executed “immediately,” but officers waited two days to coordinate with the multiple agencies involved. Rule 41(e) says “execute the warrant within a specified time no longer than 14 days.” At worse, this … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

Defendant’s alleged mistreatment during the execution of the search warrant, which was only vaguely described in the opinion, even if provable, wouldn’t overcome the overwhelming proof of guilt. Here it was raised as an IAC claim. United States v. Puente, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

E.D.Mo.: No const’l requirement copy of SW be left at site of search

2255 petitioner’s claims include one that the search should have been suppressed for state officers not leaving a copy of the search warrant at the site of the search. That’s not a constitutional defect. It’s a Rule 41 requirement, but … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No const’l requirement copy of SW be left at site of search

NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

There was a scrivener’s error in describing the cell phone subject to the search warrant, and it could be corrected by looking to the affidavit. State v. Stelly, 304 Neb. 33 (Sept. 13, 2019). Defendant has no claim that the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

WV Gazette: Officers found his $25K of heroin. He walked free, and now he’s suing police [for raiding the wrong house]

WV Gazette: Officers found his $25K of heroin. He walked free, and now he’s suing police by Jake Zuckerman. Police raided a house after falsely stating that one Figueroa lived there and made several drug deals. It was the wrong … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WV Gazette: Officers found his $25K of heroin. He walked free, and now he’s suing police [for raiding the wrong house]

CA4: USMJ must review law firm’s seized privileged materials, not USAO’s “filter team”

Two days after oral argument on a law firm’s appeal that a USMJ reviewed privileged materials seized from the firm by search warrant and not the USAO’s “filter team,” the Fourth Circuit orders the Magistrate to do it pending issuance … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: USMJ must review law firm’s seized privileged materials, not USAO’s “filter team”

CA9: The extreme of QI: officers alleged to have committed theft during execution of a SW get QI because no case says it’s a 4A violation

Officers get qualified immunity for alleged theft of $300,000 in cash and property from plaintiffs because it wasn’t clearly established that theft from a search is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Jessop v. City of Fresno, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: The extreme of QI: officers alleged to have committed theft during execution of a SW get QI because no case says it’s a 4A violation

N.D.Cal.: Compelled use of fingerprint to open cell phone not testimonial

The court at first declined to sign a search warrant for a cell phone that compelled use of a fingerprint to unlock it. After further submissions from the USAO and the FPD as invited amicus, the court concludes that a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Compelled use of fingerprint to open cell phone not testimonial

C.D.Ill.: Six month delay in searching cell phone wasn’t unreasonable considering how busy the officer was, which the government proved

It took nearly six months to search defendant’s cell phone after he consented to it because of other important matters the officer was working on. “The Mitchell court acknowledged that officer workload considerations could justify a delay in seeking a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Six month delay in searching cell phone wasn’t unreasonable considering how busy the officer was, which the government proved

D.Mont.: Destruction of a lockbox to search it was not unreasonable

Damaging a lockbox to open it under a search warrant was not unreasonable and doesn’t require suppression of its contents. Destruction of property is sometimes required to execute a search warrant: Dalia v. United States. United States v. Boeke, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Destruction of a lockbox to search it was not unreasonable

UT: SW implicitly carries authority to use reasonble force to execute it; here, taking DNA

Police had a search warrant to obtain DNA. A search warrant implies that reasonable force might have to be used to execute it. A target can’t simply refuse to comply. State v. Evans, 2019 UT App 145, 2019 Utah App. … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Warrant execution | Comments Off on UT: SW implicitly carries authority to use reasonble force to execute it; here, taking DNA

D.Kan.: In a wiretap case, resort to SWs would tip off the targets to the investigation, so they need not be relied upon first

Defendant challenges his wiretap because the investigators could have conducted more searches with warrants. Search warrants, however, are known to the targets: “However, the Court also credits the Government’s concern that isolated search warrants might have alerted the organization to … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: In a wiretap case, resort to SWs would tip off the targets to the investigation, so they need not be relied upon first

NY4: Exclusionary rule wouldn’t be applied to probation search during a time of uncertainty in the law where law now settled; no deterrence possible

The exclusionary rule would not be applied to what turned out to be an illegal probation search at a time when the law was unclear. There is no deterrent effect to be gained by applying the exclusionary rule when other … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY4: Exclusionary rule wouldn’t be applied to probation search during a time of uncertainty in the law where law now settled; no deterrence possible

CA9: A state SW executed by a federal officer doesn’t violate 4A

A state issued search warrant is not executed in violation of the Fourth Amendment because a federal law enforcement officer executed it. United States v. Cruz-Ramirez, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 21528 (9th Cir. July 19, 2019). Defendant wasn’t “in custody” … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: A state SW executed by a federal officer doesn’t violate 4A

CA8: PC shown for Facebook SW; no suppression just because Facebook produced on the 15th day

Officers had seen photographs on defendant’s Facebook page holding guns, and he was a convicted felon. There was thus probable cause for a search warrant to Facebook to produce the account. The warrant was served on Facebook with a 14 … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: PC shown for Facebook SW; no suppression just because Facebook produced on the 15th day

MN: Search of rented room in single family dwelling was reasonable under SW; it wasn’t apparent it was rented

In a stipulated evidence suppression hearing, defendant did not preserve the issue he presents for appeal. Going to the merits anyway, defendant claimed that his rented room in what was, for all appearances, a single family dwelling was reasonable. The … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MN: Search of rented room in single family dwelling was reasonable under SW; it wasn’t apparent it was rented

Cal.5: An unlawful arrest is not per se with excessive force under the 4A

An unlawful arrest is not per se with excessive force under the Fourth Amendment or state statute. People v. Perry, 2019 Cal. App. LEXIS 555 (5th Dist. June 18, 2019). The trial court’s finding that the police didn’t search defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.5: An unlawful arrest is not per se with excessive force under the 4A

D.Ariz.: FTCA doesn’t provide a damages remedy for how SW executed

FTCA doesn’t provide a damages remedy for how a search warrant is executed. Lopez v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102516 (D. Ariz. June 19, 2019) The officer’s body camera video showed one of the passengers wasn’t wearing a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: FTCA doesn’t provide a damages remedy for how SW executed