Category Archives: Exclusionary rule

ND: Exclusionary rule does not apply to civil administrative drivers license suspensions

The exclusionary rule does not apply to civil administrative drivers license suspensions. Beylund v. Levi, 2017 ND 30, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 30 (Feb. 16, 2017):

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on ND: Exclusionary rule does not apply to civil administrative drivers license suspensions

AR: Knock-and-announce applies to parole searches, but Hudson adopted and exclusionary rule doesn’t apply

The knock-and-announce rule applies to parole searches, and violation of the rule is a substantial violation of the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. The court adopts Hudson, however, and finds that the exclusionary rule should not be applied. Lane … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AR: Knock-and-announce applies to parole searches, but Hudson adopted and exclusionary rule doesn’t apply

CA11: First offender DNA sample that should have been destroyed under state law but wasn’t could be used in federal prosecution

Under Georgia law, a DNA sample from a first offender should be expunged from the system when he completes his probation or sentence. This one wasn’t. Whatever the statute says, it doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hinton, … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA11: First offender DNA sample that should have been destroyed under state law but wasn’t could be used in federal prosecution

CA8: Def’s statement was attenuated from the false statement that led to the SW being issued

An untrue statement in an affidavit for search warrant was attenuated from defendant’s later confession. All four factors of the attenuation doctrine weighed in favor of not suppressing statements defendant made during his interview with the agent. The causal connection … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s statement was attenuated from the false statement that led to the SW being issued

D.N.M.: Def’s conditional plea and slight chance of success on appeal aren’t enough to avoid detention at plea

Defendant litigated a motion to suppress and lost, and then he entered a conditional plea. Because his sentencing range is 10 years or more, he is ordered into custody. The court is not convinced there is a debatable issue for … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def’s conditional plea and slight chance of success on appeal aren’t enough to avoid detention at plea

S.D.Ohio: Undocumented alien was held w/o PC and interrogated; exclusionary rule applies

“This is a story about law-enforcement officers who take shortcuts in their zeal to make arrests and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit them from doing so.” Defendant was validly stopped, but he was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Undocumented alien was held w/o PC and interrogated; exclusionary rule applies

PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings

PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings. The court engages in a lengthy and sensitive analysis. Commonwealth v. Arter, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2916 (Dec. 28, 2016):

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on PA holds state constitution requires exclusionary rule applies to parole and probation revocation proceedings

IL: Exclusionary rule does not apply to liquor license disciplinary proceeding arising from admin search

Petitioner had a liquor license in Chicago, and an inspection occurred under authority of state law and city ordinance. The permitted premises was the first floor, but he owned accessible property in the floors above. Upstairs, the officers found a … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on IL: Exclusionary rule does not apply to liquor license disciplinary proceeding arising from admin search

IL: GFE does not apply to seizure under a statute later held unconstitutional

Defendant was stopped and relieved of a handgun by the police and charged with it. Four years later, the state supreme court held that possession of a handgun alone, without criminal purpose, violated the Second Amendment. Defendant gets the benefit … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: GFE does not apply to seizure under a statute later held unconstitutional

CA1: Arrest of removable alien was without RS, but because no flagrant violation of 4A, no suppression

Respondent was ordered removed from the country after ICE agents encountered him at work. They thought he was somebody else, and he was handcuffed and questioned. It became apparent that he wasn’t the man they were looking for, but he … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: Arrest of removable alien was without RS, but because no flagrant violation of 4A, no suppression

E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t [hardly ever] apply to violations of supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to violations of supervised release, but it might be possible if the deterrence rationale could still apply sometimes, just not here. “Thus, just like in Scott, applying the rule would inhibit the government’s ability … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t [hardly ever] apply to violations of supervised release

CO: Humane Society employee not statutorily authorized to procure SW, but court refuses to suppress

While an “animal protection agent” of the Humane Society is not statutorily authorized to seek a search warrant under Colorado law, the court refuses to suppress because there was probable cause and the warrant was otherwise executed reasonably. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CO: Humane Society employee not statutorily authorized to procure SW, but court refuses to suppress

MA: Exclusionary rule not applied to MJ discovered during entry after 911 call

Police were called to an apartment because of noise then a water leak into their place. The officer went to look for the cause and found a mason jar with marijuana. The grant of the motion to suppress is reversed … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MA: Exclusionary rule not applied to MJ discovered during entry after 911 call

FL1: Assault of officer on porch attempting to talk to def leading to police entry and more resisting not subject to exclusion

Police came to defendant’s trailer to talk to him about a domestic battery allegation. He refused to come out, and argued at the door with the police. Finally, he reached out and slapped an officer’s hand. That led to them … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk | Comments Off on FL1: Assault of officer on porch attempting to talk to def leading to police entry and more resisting not subject to exclusion

S.D.Ohio: Whether Ohio window tint law is unconstitutional or not, that doesn’t make the stop unreasonable

Ohio’s window tint law delegates to administrators to determine the degree of tint. Whether the law is unconstitutional or not, that doesn’t make the stop under the law unreasonable or unconstitutional. United States v. Torbert, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125616 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Whether Ohio window tint law is unconstitutional or not, that doesn’t make the stop unreasonable

KY: Click on wrong name on LPN reader screen same as erroneous warrant; exclusionary rule not applied because of mere negligence

An officer on patrol was running LPNs to see what he’d find. On defendant’s vehicle, a list a names came up, and the officer accidentally clicked on the wrong name resulting in defendant’s stop for an outstanding warrant that didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on KY: Click on wrong name on LPN reader screen same as erroneous warrant; exclusionary rule not applied because of mere negligence

SCOTUSBlog: The Court after Scalia: Scalia’s absence may help preserve the exclusionary rule

SCOTUSBlog: The Court after Scalia: Scalia’s absence may help preserve the exclusionary rule by Orin Kerr:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: The Court after Scalia: Scalia’s absence may help preserve the exclusionary rule

W.D.Tex.: In a Playpen case, planting software on a computer to cause it to transmit its address is “unquestionably a search”

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in IP addresses, but planting software on a computer to cause it to transmit its address is “unquestionably a search.” Recognizing the split of authority, Rule 41 was violated, but the court declines … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: In a Playpen case, planting software on a computer to cause it to transmit its address is “unquestionably a search”

NE follows Herring on no exclusion for slow updating of warrant database

Defendant was arrested based on an outdated warrant. State law prior to Herring likely would have provided relief, but the court is now bound by Herring and concludes that the exclusionary rule would not be applied. Yes, there was delay … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NE follows Herring on no exclusion for slow updating of warrant database

N.D.Ala.: Strieff applied to a possibly negligent look through a garage window when OnStar reported location of stolen car

A Cadillac was stolen from a car dealer, and it was tracked by OnStar in the car. Police came to do a knock-and-talk. Two cars were in the carport that weren’t the stolen car. They looked through a window of … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Strieff applied to a possibly negligent look through a garage window when OnStar reported location of stolen car