Category Archives: Good faith exception

TX1: Davis GFE does not apply because of statutory exclusionary rule

“[T]he judge-made Davis exception to the judge-made federal exclusionary rule does not create an exception to the Texas exclusionary rule adopted by the Texas Legislature. Because the search warrant in this case was not based on probable cause, the Texas … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on TX1: Davis GFE does not apply because of statutory exclusionary rule

OH9: Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure

Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure even if based on an alleged furtive movement. The stop was based on a robbery report, and this vehicle was more than a half mile … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure

D.Mass.: Court order for CSLI under SCA not “clearly unconstitutional”

A court order on probable cause for CSLI information under the SCA was not clearly unconstitutional and good faith would apply in any event. [It it’s issued on probable cause, what’s the problem?] United States v. Letellier, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Court order for CSLI under SCA not “clearly unconstitutional”

E.D.Va.: CSLI order issued before binding CA4 case was with good faith

A USMJ issued an order for CSLI, and, for the sake of argument, the court assumes it was without probable cause and it was before United States v. Graham (“Graham II”), 796 F.3d 332 (4th Cir. 2015). Reliance on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: CSLI order issued before binding CA4 case was with good faith

Cal.4: Dispatch told officer that def was on probation for one crime, but it actually had expired; he was, however, on probation for something else; GFE applied

The officer here responded to a suspicious activity report and found a stolen trailer in defendant’s yard with a piece of pipe on it. He inquired of dispatch and was told defendant was on probation for brandishing a weapon. He … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.4: Dispatch told officer that def was on probation for one crime, but it actually had expired; he was, however, on probation for something else; GFE applied

Two on Davis good faith exception; one a 20 year old cold case

In a cold case rape and murder that came from retesting defendant’s DNA 20 years after the crime, a search incident that was valid in 1985 was now saved by Davis good faith. State v. Adams, 2015-Ohio-3954, 2015 Ohio LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on Two on Davis good faith exception; one a 20 year old cold case

D.N.J.: Plain view supported seizure of records outside scope of search warrant

In a Medicaid fraud document search warrant, some documents found were outside of the scope of the warrant, but they satisfied the plain view doctrine that their potential incriminating nature was immediately apparent and they were found in the course … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Plain view supported seizure of records outside scope of search warrant

E.D.Ky.: SW application failed to show nexus to def’s house, and GFE can’t apply

This search warrant’s application failed to show nexus, even by inference. This is significant, and it makes it a “bare bones” affidavit not subject to the good faith exception. United States v. Spillman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128878 (E.D.Ky. September … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW application failed to show nexus to def’s house, and GFE can’t apply

The Nation: Think Police Can’t Use Illegally Obtained Evidence Against You? Think Again.

The Nation: Think Police Can’t Use Illegally Obtained Evidence Against You? Think Again. by Paul Butler: Hudson v. Michigan is one in a series of cases in which the Roberts Court has blessed police officers with extraordinary power. This power … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on The Nation: Think Police Can’t Use Illegally Obtained Evidence Against You? Think Again.

CA9: Vague uncorroborated anonymous tip could not support warrant, which was also overbroad, and the good faith exception cannot apply

Officers received a vague anonymous tip relayed through an apartment manager about a tenant having ten pounds of marijuana. They were able to somehow link it to defendant, and they did a knock-and-talk. Defendant admitted to being a medical marijuana … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA9: Vague uncorroborated anonymous tip could not support warrant, which was also overbroad, and the good faith exception cannot apply

CA6: If it’s a close case on nexus to a drug dealer’s home, the GFE is good enough for government work

While the proof of nexus to defendant’s house was thin, the USMJ could reasonably draw the inference that defendant’s base of operations for his drug sales was his house. “It is a close question whether Agent Fitch’s affidavit sets forth … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: If it’s a close case on nexus to a drug dealer’s home, the GFE is good enough for government work

CA8: Rodriguez loses on remand to Davis GFE [the ultimate perversion of good faith: the guy whose case made the rule loses, too]

WaPo: Volokh Conspiracy: Rodriguez wins, Rodriguez loses by Orin Kerr (United States v. Rodriguez, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15675 (8th Cir. September 3, 2015):

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Rodriguez loses on remand to Davis GFE [the ultimate perversion of good faith: the guy whose case made the rule loses, too]

MN: Davis good faith exception applies to police conduct prior to McNeely in DUI warrants

Davis good faith exception applies to police conduct prior to McNeely in DUI warrants. State v. Lindquist, 2015 Minn. LEXIS 469 (August 19, 2015):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on MN: Davis good faith exception applies to police conduct prior to McNeely in DUI warrants

NJ: A vacated warrant not yet removed from computer system could not be relied on in good faith (3-3)

Affirming the Appellate Division by an equally divided vote: the arresting officer’s good faith belief that a valid warrant for defendant’s arrest was outstanding cannot render an arrest made in the absence of a valid warrant or probable cause constitutionally … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on NJ: A vacated warrant not yet removed from computer system could not be relied on in good faith (3-3)

CA8: No REP in public areas of a store; telephonic warrant relied on in good faith; tribal judge not shown to not be neutral and detached because she had spoken out on def’s store

Defendant’s convenience store was arguably open, and he didn’t show that it was closed, for an officer to come in and observe synthetic marijuana for sale. He thus did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The officer obtained a … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: No REP in public areas of a store; telephonic warrant relied on in good faith; tribal judge not shown to not be neutral and detached because she had spoken out on def’s store

CA4: Cell site location information requires a search warrant or other court order; but GFE applies this time

Cell site location information requires a search warrant or other court order. The government, however, gets a good faith argument for reliance on the Stored Communications Act. [Not so the next time.] United States v. Graham, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Cell site location information requires a search warrant or other court order; but GFE applies this time

E.D.La.: Is a USMJ neutral and detached when the target of the search warrant the judge just signed is allegedly having an affair with the judge’s husband but the defense can’t prove the judge knew?

Is a USMJ neutral and detached when the target of the search warrant the judge just signed is allegedly having an affair with the judge’s husband but the defense can’t prove the judge knew? True or not, that has no … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Is a USMJ neutral and detached when the target of the search warrant the judge just signed is allegedly having an affair with the judge’s husband but the defense can’t prove the judge knew?

CA4: Objectively reasonable reliance on NCIC readout supported arrest on an outdated warrant still in system; NCIC’s errors ignored

NCIC showed a warrant was outstanding, and defendant told the officer it was quashed. Yet, it still was in the system. The officer checked various databases from his car computer, and he found nothing that showed that the warrant wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Objectively reasonable reliance on NCIC readout supported arrest on an outdated warrant still in system; NCIC’s errors ignored

MD: Davis good faith saves a search incident of a cell phone 3 years before Riley was decided, even though no state case ever said so

Search incident of defendant’s cell phone two and three years before Riley was decided was in Davis good faith based on Robinson [even though no state or Fourth Circuit case had said so]. Demby v. State, 2015 Md. LEXIS 490 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on MD: Davis good faith saves a search incident of a cell phone 3 years before Riley was decided, even though no state case ever said so

D.Md.: Blanket suppression reserved for flagrant cases; this isn’t

The search warrant didn’t specify that cash was subject to seizure, but it reasonably falls within evidence of the subject matter of the search warrant. To exclude the cash would be a “hypertechnical” suppression argument. Moreover, blanket suppression is reserved … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Blanket suppression reserved for flagrant cases; this isn’t