Daily Archives: March 31, 2016

MD: Stringray/Hailstorm cell phone tracking device a search; nondisclosure agreement unconstitutional

The use of a Stingray/Hailstorm device to track a cell phone is a search under the Fourth Amendment. The Nondisclosure Agreement is essentially unconstitutional because of the state’s argument they don’t have to disclose what they were doing. The court … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on MD: Stringray/Hailstorm cell phone tracking device a search; nondisclosure agreement unconstitutional

WaPo: What life is like after police ransack your house and take ‘every belonging’ — then the charges are dropped

WaPo: What life is like after police ransack your house and take ‘every belonging’ — then the charges are dropped By Christopher Ingraham: A self-described Michigan “soccer mom” who had “every belonging” taken from her family in a 2014 drug … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on WaPo: What life is like after police ransack your house and take ‘every belonging’ — then the charges are dropped

OH11: Officers had reason to believe def at home; entry and plain view valid

Officers had an arrest warrant for defendant and knocked at her apartment door saying only “Sheriff’s Office.” A falsetto voice said “Ashley’s not here.” Officers responded “How do you know we’re looking for Ashley?” They were let in, and they … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Officers had reason to believe def at home; entry and plain view valid

IL: Unconveyed intent to seize def didn’t make this not consensual

The officer’s subjective intent that this was a seizure was not conveyed to defendant, and each of the queries to defendant were requests not commands. Defendant consented. “Specifically, LaGrange testified that when he asked Youngman if he had anything illegal … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: Unconveyed intent to seize def didn’t make this not consensual

CA11: Putting a backpack in trunk and distancing self from it and then giving false name was abandonment

The search of defendant’s backpack was supported by two rationales: Lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy and automobile exception. As to the former, “Even if Rivera did have a reasonable expectation of privacy, the district court found that Rivera … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: Putting a backpack in trunk and distancing self from it and then giving false name was abandonment

N.D.Ill.: Assistance and foreign wiretap were done by locals; no U.S. involvement, so no 4A protection

Defendant was indicted for ATM skimming and other identity theft offenses. The FBI started the investigation and contacted Bulgarian police about phone numbers from there. Bulgarian police tied the numbers to defendant, and they procured wiretaps at U.S. request and … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Assistance and foreign wiretap were done by locals; no U.S. involvement, so no 4A protection

N.D.Ga.: Making money but no job was RS for a probation search

Reasonable suspicion for a probation search came from a “trusted” person call that defendant was making money but had no job and he was a past meth dealer. That was enough. Then defendant consented, too. United States v. Danner, 2016 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Making money but no job was RS for a probation search

MA: Collective knowledge of nothing is still nothing, despite stopping officer’s good faith

Collective knowledge here was not reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s vehicle was reportedly involved in a shooting and stopped based on a radio report from Boston PD to another department. Defendant, however, had left the scene of the shooting ten minutes before … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge | Comments Off on MA: Collective knowledge of nothing is still nothing, despite stopping officer’s good faith

U.S.News & World Report: Merrick Garland’s Trunk-Search Ruling Gives Some Defense Advocates Chills [Typical Internet headline hyperbole]

U.S.News & World Report: Merrick Garland’s Trunk-Search Ruling Gives Some Defense Advocates Chills Scholars say, however, the decision is within the judicial mainstream. [The headline alone is enough to make me not even want to read it because the writer … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on U.S.News & World Report: Merrick Garland’s Trunk-Search Ruling Gives Some Defense Advocates Chills [Typical Internet headline hyperbole]