Daily Archives: March 28, 2016

CNN breaking news: DOJ drops case against Apple over breaking into iPhone

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CNN breaking news: DOJ drops case against Apple over breaking into iPhone

New law review article: “An Economic Understanding of Search and Seizure Law”

Orin Kerr, An Economic Understanding of Search and Seizure Law, 164 U.Penn. L.Rev. 591 (2016). Abstract: This Article uses economic concepts to understand search and seizure law, the law governing government investigations that is most often associated with the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New law review article: “An Economic Understanding of Search and Seizure Law”

IL: Lost page of affidavit for SW can be proved without resort to formality of Court Records Restoration Act

When page two of the original complaint for search warrant disappeared, the state was not required to comply with the Court Records Restoration Act to prove up the search warrant at the suppression hearing. A normally authenticated copy would do. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Burden of proof, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on IL: Lost page of affidavit for SW can be proved without resort to formality of Court Records Restoration Act

ID: “There is no constitutional right not to be mistaken for a criminal. ‘The Constitution does not guarantee that only the guilty will be arrested.'”

Plaintiff was a sublessee of a dental office laboratory but was seen breaking in through a window by a neighbor who called 911. Police arrived and the reporter said the woman appeared drunk or on drugs. The first officer to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: “There is no constitutional right not to be mistaken for a criminal. ‘The Constitution does not guarantee that only the guilty will be arrested.'”

W.D.Mo.: No right to return of electronic data where def already has it from gov’t

A motion for return of property under Rule 41(g) is properly denied where the defendant has complete electronic versions of the records. United States v. Womack, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39097 (W.D.Mo. March 25, 2016). Defendant was pulled over because … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No right to return of electronic data where def already has it from gov’t

N.D.Ga.: State exceptions to GFE don’t apply in federal court even where state judge issued SW

A Georgia state judge issued this search warrant, and it was supported by probable cause. In any event, the good faith exception saves it. Any exception to the good faith exception under Georgia law is irrelevant in a federal prosecution. … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: State exceptions to GFE don’t apply in federal court even where state judge issued SW

D.Haw.: The nature of Hawai’i being what it is, it was not unreasonable for Postal Inspectors to divert a package to Honolulu for search

Defendant was suspected of shipping meth from Oahu to Kauai, Hawai’i. He flew out one morning to Honolulu and was returning that night. Officers waited in the airport for his return. They had two warrants for his arrest. When he … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Haw.: The nature of Hawai’i being what it is, it was not unreasonable for Postal Inspectors to divert a package to Honolulu for search

NY4: Driver has no standing in search of passenger’s person

Defendant has no standing to contest the search of the person of the passenger in his car. People v. Gibson, 2016 NY Slip Op 02193, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2171 (4th Dept. March 25, 2016). There was justification for … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: Driver has no standing in search of passenger’s person