Category Archives: Scope of search

D.Nev.: SW for def’s trailer for evidence of practicing medicine without a license didn’t support search of a safe

The probable cause was for search of defendant’s trailer for evidence of conducting an illegal medical practice. Nothing in the affidavit supported search of defendant’s safe inside the trailer which was broken open and then a warrant was obtained to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: SW for def’s trailer for evidence of practicing medicine without a license didn’t support search of a safe

Army Ct.Crim.App.: SW for evidence of sex abuse on computer didn’t include child porn

A military search warrant for evidence of “attempted sexual abuse of a child, abusive sexual contact with a child and other offenses related” did not include child pornography. When child pornography was found, another warrant was required, and CID didn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Military searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on Army Ct.Crim.App.: SW for evidence of sex abuse on computer didn’t include child porn

NM: Consent to look at one receipt during a stop didn’t justify looking at any others

Two stops of defendant towing a van a couple of minutes apart were separately justified. The second stop was based on the owner of the van saying that defendant took it from him, but that was only to a second … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on NM: Consent to look at one receipt during a stop didn’t justify looking at any others

N.D.Cal.: Def’s motion to suppress because of overseizure is denied for moment; parties to confer on what might be suppressible

Defendant argued that the search warrant for documents exceeded the scope of the warrant. Counsel’s declaration was insufficient, but the court recognizes the argument and orders the parties to confer and determine that which they can agree. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s motion to suppress because of overseizure is denied for moment; parties to confer on what might be suppressible

FL3: Consent to search bedroom was solely for cell phone; search of dresser after phone was found suppressed

Defendant signed a general consent for his bedroom, but the police told him they were only looking for a stolen cell phone. After they found the cell phone, they started searching his dresser drawers and found cocaine. The search exceeded … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Scope of search | Comments Off on FL3: Consent to search bedroom was solely for cell phone; search of dresser after phone was found suppressed

WY: It was reasonable for officer to believe backpack behind driver was his for consent search; no objection from passenger

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search of his backpack in the car of another when the other consented to a search of the car. Defendant’s backpack was behind the driver, not him, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Scope of search | Comments Off on WY: It was reasonable for officer to believe backpack behind driver was his for consent search; no objection from passenger

MA: Def’s furtive movement was hiding a small quantity of MJ, and that didn’t justify search of the backseat area when he was out of car

During a traffic stop, defendant lifted himself up consistent with hiding something, and that justified an order to get out of the car. When only a small quantity of marijuana was found, the exigency dissipated, and a search of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on MA: Def’s furtive movement was hiding a small quantity of MJ, and that didn’t justify search of the backseat area when he was out of car

NJ: SW including “all persons present or reasonably connected to the property” didn’t permit search of two men in car down street

Two men parked in a car down the street could not be searched under a warrant for nearby property with an “all persons present or reasonably connected to the property” clause. There was no way to connect them to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: SW including “all persons present or reasonably connected to the property” didn’t permit search of two men in car down street

PA: Trial court erred in finding separate room in apt searched with SW was somebody else’s separate living quarters

The search warrant was for an apartment, and there was no justification for the trial court’s finding that a separate room inside was really separate living quarters for somebody else. There was no separate entrance or no mailbox. Commonwealth v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Trial court erred in finding separate room in apt searched with SW was somebody else’s separate living quarters

CA6: Where def refused to provide combination to his safe during execution of a SW, it was reasonable to pry it open

Defendant showed the police that he had marijuana inside his home and the police obtained a warrant to search his home. Thus, suppression was not warranted because there was an outright certainty, not just a “fair probability,” that the house … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: Where def refused to provide combination to his safe during execution of a SW, it was reasonable to pry it open

MA: SW for def’s house authorized seizure and a search of his person on his front sidewalk

A search warrant for defendant’s house authorized police to detain and search him on the sidewalk out front of his house and seize his cell phone from him under Michigan v. Summers and state cases applying it. Commonwealth v. Mattier, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Scope of search | Comments Off on MA: SW for def’s house authorized seizure and a search of his person on his front sidewalk

VA: Girlfriend’s authority over room didn’t extend to boyfriend’s closed bag

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his girlfriend’s room because they both were staying there, but he retained it in a closed bag left in her room. She had the authority to consent to a search of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Scope of search | Comments Off on VA: Girlfriend’s authority over room didn’t extend to boyfriend’s closed bag

KS: A vehicle on the curtilage belonging at house may be searched with a SW for the “premises”

A car belonging to the house the target of a search warrant and on the curtilage at the time of execution is subject to search under a warrant for the “premises.” In this case, defendant’s son was sitting in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Scope of search | Comments Off on KS: A vehicle on the curtilage belonging at house may be searched with a SW for the “premises”

D.Neb.: Cut and paste error where address went into “things to be seized” wasn’t fatal where things were apparent from warrant application as a whole

An apparent cut and paste error led to the officer pasting the place to be searched into the things to be seized section of the warrant looking for clothing from a robbery. The affidavit included pages of photographs of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Cut and paste error where address went into “things to be seized” wasn’t fatal where things were apparent from warrant application as a whole

MO: Where items included in SW without PC, severance of the warrant is required, not blanket suppression

Officers checked off boxes on a search warrant form about what to search for (not a good way to present a warrant). Items 1-9 (property) that were found were supported by probable cause, and item 10 (corpse) wasn’t, but that … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: Where items included in SW without PC, severance of the warrant is required, not blanket suppression

PA: Warrant said “residence,” so it was not limited to garage, even though the PC was directed at it

The drug search warrant specified “the residence,” but the primary focus was the garage because that’s what the police knew. That did not mean, however, that only the garage could be searched. In the course of the drug investigation, police … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Warrant said “residence,” so it was not limited to garage, even though the PC was directed at it

OR: SW for trace evidence on carpets allowed search of carpet cleaning equipment

In an attempted murder case, defendant was convicted of conspiracy. “[P]olice had a warrant to search the entire residence for evidence, and that DNA, blood or blood spatter, hair, and trace evidence were the types of evidence that one could … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on OR: SW for trace evidence on carpets allowed search of carpet cleaning equipment

N.D.Cal.: Searching a Bible during a house drug search was reasonable in case it was hollowed out

Searching a Bible during a house drug search was reasonable in case it was hollowed out. A page was dog eared and noted as potentially relevant to the case. Opening the Bible was reasonable under the circumstance. The case starts … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Searching a Bible during a house drug search was reasonable in case it was hollowed out

CO: “Appurtenances” in a search warrant included a shed out back

A search warrant for weapons involved in a shooting included the house and “appurtenances” and that included a shed out back. A sawed-off shotgun was found, and that led to a separate charge. There’s no constitutional right to possess a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on CO: “Appurtenances” in a search warrant included a shed out back

CA3: “Computer hardware” and “any equipment” in a child porn SW includes cell phones

“The warrant, as written, defines ‘computer hardware’ broadly. Horton does not and cannot argue that his cell phone is not ‘computer hardware’ as it is defined in the warrant, which includes ‘any equipment’ (emphasis added) capable of transmitting computer data. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: “Computer hardware” and “any equipment” in a child porn SW includes cell phones