Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

D.Mass.: Transit worker in safety sensitive position could be drug tested for an “incident” short of an “accident”

The Boston MTA did not violate the Fourth Amendment by requiring a drug test of an employee involved in an “incident” short of an “accident.” The employee was in a safety sensitive position. Cabral v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., Boston … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Transit worker in safety sensitive position could be drug tested for an “incident” short of an “accident”

WA: EMTs would be medicating and intubating def in transit after car wreck, and that’s exigency for warrantless blood draw

Defendant was in a bad wreck and the first responders could smell alcohol. He was going to be medicated and intubated for transport to the ER. A warrantless blood draw was reasonable for exigent circumstances because the sample would have … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WA: EMTs would be medicating and intubating def in transit after car wreck, and that’s exigency for warrantless blood draw

PA: Birchfield doesn’t prevent evidence of refusal

“[W]e conclude the ‘evidentiary consequence’ provided by Section 1547(e) for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood test — the admission of that refusal at a subsequent trial for DUI — remains constitutionally permissible post-Birchfield. We therefore affirm the order … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Birchfield doesn’t prevent evidence of refusal

PA: Refusal to submit to a test is admissible under Birchfield

“[W]e conclude the ‘evidentiary consequence’ provided by Section 1547(e) for refusing to submit to a warrantless blood test — the admission of that refusal at a subsequent trial for DUI — remains constitutionally permissible post-Birchfield. We therefore affirm the order … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Seizure | Comments Off on PA: Refusal to submit to a test is admissible under Birchfield

MN: Limited right to counsel before blood test doesn’t apply to SW blood draws

“The limited right to counsel established in Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 473 N.W.2d 828 (Minn. 1991), does not apply when an individual is asked to submit to a blood test pursuant to a warrant.” (Syllabus) State v. Rosenbush, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on MN: Limited right to counsel before blood test doesn’t apply to SW blood draws

KS: Random suspicionless drug testing of any probationer is reasonable under special needs

Random suspicionless drug testing of any probationer (even those from nondrug cases), satisfied the Fourth Amendment and state constitution under special needs. State v. Hinnenkamp, 2019 Kan. App. LEXIS 44 (July 5, 2019):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search, Special needs | Comments Off on KS: Random suspicionless drug testing of any probationer is reasonable under special needs

Pacific Standard: West Virginia Will Now Provide Free Community College Tuition If Students Can Pass a Drug Test

Pacific Standard: West Virginia Will Now Provide Free Community College Tuition If Students Can Pass a Drug Test by Kelley Czajka: The program is the first in the country to introduce drug testing as an eligibility requirement.

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Pacific Standard: West Virginia Will Now Provide Free Community College Tuition If Students Can Pass a Drug Test

SCOTUSblog: Opinion analysis: Court upholds warrantless blood tests for unconscious drunk-driving suspects

SCOTUSblog: Opinion analysis: Court upholds warrantless blood tests for unconscious drunk-driving suspects by Amy Howe: Yesterday a divided Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment generally does not bar states from taking a blood sample from an unconscious drunk-driving suspect … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSblog: Opinion analysis: Court upholds warrantless blood tests for unconscious drunk-driving suspects

SCOTUS: Warrantless blood draw from unconscious driver not unreasonable

A warrantless blood draw from an unconscious driver who became unconscious by the time he arrived at the hospital was reasonable under a state law that permits warrantless BAC testing of those incapable of consent by implied consent. Remanded, however, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Warrantless blood draw from unconscious driver not unreasonable

AZ: Choice of law, exclusionary rule, and GFE

“¶1 Don Jacob Havatone appeals from his convictions and sentences for two counts of aggravated driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (‘DUI’), one count of aggravated assault, one count of endangerment, and four counts of misdemeanor assault. Because a … Continue reading

Posted in Choice of law, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AZ: Choice of law, exclusionary rule, and GFE

Misinformation as to consequences of refusal of BAC test violates 4A

“Vigen was not informed the refusal to take a urine test was a crime punishable in the same manner as driving under the influence as required by the legislature.” He can set aside his guilty plea. State v. Vigen, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Misinformation as to consequences of refusal of BAC test violates 4A

ND: Def’s arrangement for another to take possession of his package showed his standing

Defendant’s arrangement with another person to pickup his package showed his control over the package, and that gave him standing. State v. Gardner, 2019 ND 122, 2019 N.D. LEXIS 130 (May 16, 2019) (quoting Treatise § 3.13). “Vigen was not … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on ND: Def’s arrangement for another to take possession of his package showed his standing

OK: State blood draw statute was suspect, but GFE applies

The state blood draw is constitutionally suspect, but the court doesn’t have to go there. The officer’s actions in relying on it was still good faith. Stewart v. State, 2019 OK CR 6, 2019 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OK: State blood draw statute was suspect, but GFE applies

M.D.Fla.: CSLI order 3½ months before Carpenter was valid under GFE; officers not expected to know what SCOTUS will do

CSLI order issued 3½ months before Carpenter was valid under good faith exception. Officers were not expected to know what SCOTUS would do. United States v. Turner, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81011 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2019), adopted, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: CSLI order 3½ months before Carpenter was valid under GFE; officers not expected to know what SCOTUS will do

PA: Philly’s DUI consent form valid under Birchfield

The Philadelphia P.D.’s DUI consent form is facially valid and doesn’t violate Birchfield. Commonwealth v. Geary, 2019 PA Super 149, 2019 Pa. Super. LEXIS 440 (May 6, 2019).* State law provides a mechanism to challenge an alleged illegal search by … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on PA: Philly’s DUI consent form valid under Birchfield

Cal.5: Probation search condition applies to BAC blood draw

Defendant was on probation for DWI. His warrantless probation search condition applied to determining his BAC level. People v. Cruz, 2019 Cal. App. LEXIS 384 (5th Dist. Apr. 25, 2019). This condition was imposed for another DWI. Why wouldn’t a … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.5: Probation search condition applies to BAC blood draw

ScotusBlog: Argument analysis: Justices debate warrantless blood draw for unconscious drunk driver

ScotusBlog: Argument analysis: Justices debate warrantless blood draw for unconscious drunk driver by Amy Howe:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on ScotusBlog: Argument analysis: Justices debate warrantless blood draw for unconscious drunk driver

PBS: Police are now taking roadside blood samples to catch impaired drivers

PBS: Police are now taking roadside blood samples to catch impaired drivers by Jenni Bergal:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on PBS: Police are now taking roadside blood samples to catch impaired drivers

ScotusBlog: Argument preview: Justices to weigh constitutionality of state law allowing blood test of unconscious drivers without a warrant

ScotusBlog: Argument preview: Justices to weigh constitutionality of state law allowing blood test of unconscious drivers without a warrant by Amy Howe re Mitchell v. Wisconsin being argued April 23, 2019.

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, SCOTUS | Comments Off on ScotusBlog: Argument preview: Justices to weigh constitutionality of state law allowing blood test of unconscious drivers without a warrant

OH4: Ohio implied consent statute for blood draw survives Birchfield

“It is true that the United States Supreme Court has recently determined, in Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 2162, 2172-2186 (2016), that ‘the taking of a blood sample or the administration of a breath test is search[,]’ and … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH4: Ohio implied consent statute for blood draw survives Birchfield