Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

AZ: Non-consensual blood draw DUI provision is unconstitutional as applied, but the Davis GFE applies

Non-consensual blood draw DUI provision is unconstitutional as applied, but the Davis good faith exception applies here. Defendant was airlifted to a Nevada hospital for the blood draw. The trial court didn’t make findings on whether Nevada or Arizona law … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: Non-consensual blood draw DUI provision is unconstitutional as applied, but the Davis GFE applies

ME: Def’s mere acquiescence to his blood draw was not consent

Defendant’s mere acquiescence in his blood draw was not consent, and the trial court’s suppression order is affirmed. Implied consent no longer exists by statute, and the state had to prove consent. The trial court held that it did not, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ME: Def’s mere acquiescence to his blood draw was not consent

WI: The low threshold for def’s BAC level contributed to exigent circumstances

Defendant was unconscious after hitting a deer with his motorcycle when his blood was drawn in the hospital. There was probable cause, and, because of the delay, the officer reasonably concluded there were exigent circumstances because defendant’s offense threshold was … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WI: The low threshold for def’s BAC level contributed to exigent circumstances

NE implied consent law was unconstitutional as applied here, but not on its face

“In this instance, without a warrant, nor exigent circumstance, the State could only rely upon the exception of a warrantless search incident to a lawful arrest for drunk driving in order to demand a blood test from McCumber. With the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE implied consent law was unconstitutional as applied here, but not on its face

D.Neb.: Govt proved inventory valid and not pretext; there was also PC for the search

Defendants were arrested for robbery, and they objected to the R&R as failing to consider that the inventory of the vehicle was a pretext for an investigative search. The court finds that the policy on inventory was followed and that … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Govt proved inventory valid and not pretext; there was also PC for the search

GA on implied consent

The trial court properly granted the motion to suppress. The evidence showed that defendant was extremely intoxicated and confused during her encounter with the officer, and that supporting the conclusion that she did not voluntarily consent to the blood test, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on GA on implied consent

ID: Implied consent remains an exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

Implied consent remains an exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely. State v. Ortega-Vastida, 2017 Ida. App. LEXIS 15 (Feb. 9, 2017):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on ID: Implied consent remains an exception to the warrant requirement under McNeely

AZ: Implied consent to treatment must be shown for obtaining blood sample from medical care provider for DUI

When a DUI suspect is unconscious, the state must still prove at least implied consent to medical treatment to get a blood draw from the medical care provider. State v. Nissley, 2017 Ariz. LEXIS 24 (Feb. 1, 2017), vacating 238 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on AZ: Implied consent to treatment must be shown for obtaining blood sample from medical care provider for DUI

NJ: Passenger’s furtive movements justify ordering him from car

A passenger’s furtive movements can justify ordering him out of the car. As an aside, the court chides defense counsel for not addressing the issue before appeal so the parties could develop the record. [Most other states would say it … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NJ: Passenger’s furtive movements justify ordering him from car

PA: Warrantless blood draw of unconscious def after car wreck was reasonable

A warrantless blood draw was permissible where defendant was unconscious at the scene of an accident and unconscious through the blood draw at the hospital. Commonwealth v. March, 2017 PA Super 18, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 26, 2017). … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on PA: Warrantless blood draw of unconscious def after car wreck was reasonable

Pro Publica: Texas Panel on Wrongful Convictions Calls for Ending Use of Unverified Drug Field Tests

Pro Publica: Texas Panel on Wrongful Convictions Calls for Ending Use of Unverified Drug Field Tests by Ryan Gabrielson: A commission established by lawmakers to help end the conviction of the innocent says field tests are too unreliable to be … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on Pro Publica: Texas Panel on Wrongful Convictions Calls for Ending Use of Unverified Drug Field Tests

OH2: Def providing key when asked was consent to opening locked drawer

The record supports the conclusion that defendant consented to opening a locked drawer by providing the key when the officer asked for it. State v. Muncy, 2017-Ohio-121, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 89 (2d Dist. Jan. 13, 2017). Defendant was stopped … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH2: Def providing key when asked was consent to opening locked drawer

IA: CoA declines to obviate the automobile exception; that’s up to state SCt if it ever happens

“On appeal, Wagamon ‘urges that now is the time to determine if the automobile exception is out of date and incompatible with the protections offered by the Iowa Constitution.’” That’s the prerogative only of the state supreme court. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on IA: CoA declines to obviate the automobile exception; that’s up to state SCt if it ever happens

TX DWIs: RS for cont’d detention to get certified officer there; no justification shown for failure to get a SW for draw

There was reasonable suspicion of DWI for defendant’s detention for an additional 21 minutes to get an officer there certified to conduct an HGN test. The delay for was legitimate law enforcement and investigative purposes. Cagle v. State, 2016 Tex. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX DWIs: RS for cont’d detention to get certified officer there; no justification shown for failure to get a SW for draw

WA following McNeely holds that there is no per se exigency and refusal to take a breath test is admissible on question of guilt

Applying McNeely: “The district courts correctly rejected the State’s argument that alcohol dissipation constitutes exigency per se—exigency must be determined under the totality of circumstances, case by case. We hold that the implied consent statute does not authorize a warrantless … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on WA following McNeely holds that there is no per se exigency and refusal to take a breath test is admissible on question of guilt

CA8 en banc holds tech college could only drug test students in safety sensitive areas; broad testing program violates 4A

The Eighth Circuit en banc holds that (formerly) Linn State Technical College (now State Technical College of Missouri) could only drug test students in safety sensitive areas. Its broad testing program violates the Fourth Amendment. The college’s case is controlled … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on CA8 en banc holds tech college could only drug test students in safety sensitive areas; broad testing program violates 4A

DE: Search incident of book bag left in car for FTA arrest violates Gant

Defendant was a passenger in a vehicle stopped for a brake light violation. The officer found an outstanding warrant for failure to appear and defendant was arrested and put into the patrol car. The search of defendant’s book bag back … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on DE: Search incident of book bag left in car for FTA arrest violates Gant

Police One: What cops need to know about blood alcohol testing and the Fourth Amendment

Police One: What cops need to know about blood alcohol testing and the Fourth Amendment by Terrence P. Dwyer: Make sure you’re current on your state’s driving while intoxicated and implied consent laws Driving while intoxicated is a serious offense … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Police One: What cops need to know about blood alcohol testing and the Fourth Amendment

MN: Misleading advice of implied consent rights and duties violated due process; Birchfield distinguished

Misleading advice of implied consent rights and duties violated due process. Birchfield distinguished. Johnson v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety, 2016 Minn. App. LEXIS 75 (Nov. 7, 2016)*:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on MN: Misleading advice of implied consent rights and duties violated due process; Birchfield distinguished

GA: Being handcuffed did not preclude her from having consented to a breath test

Defendant’s being handcuffed did not preclude her from having consented to a breath test. State v. Young, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 615 (Nov. 2, 2016). Defendant’s stop was for speeding, and that’s not contested. The officer “testified that he found … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Being handcuffed did not preclude her from having consented to a breath test