Category Archives: Informant hearsay

W.D.Pa.: CSLI warrant based on CI’s statement was with PC

The CSLI warrant here was based on probable cause from a CI. “In sum, the Affidavit was not required to contain a statement regarding the confidential informant’s reliability and its absence is not dispositive of the reliability determination or the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: CSLI warrant based on CI’s statement was with PC

CA8: Def consented by his admissions on two recordings and rejecting expert witness saying consent form was forged

The district court’s findings of consent were supported by the evidence. Defendant provided a claimed expert witness that testified that the signature on the consent form appeared to be forged. The government’s cross examination attacked the witness’s methodology and qualifications, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA8: Def consented by his admissions on two recordings and rejecting expert witness saying consent form was forged

TN: Conclusory statement from CI defs had drugs and unsuccessful controlled buy was neither PC for warrant nor RS for probation search

The trial court properly granted defendants’ motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a warrantless search of their house. The information possessed by the officers at the time of the search, including a conclusory statement from a confidential … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on TN: Conclusory statement from CI defs had drugs and unsuccessful controlled buy was neither PC for warrant nor RS for probation search

W.D.Tex.: Two citizen informants corroborated each other

Two identified citizen informants fully corroborated each other for reasonable suspicion. United States v. O’Brien, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104936 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2017).* “The officers’ interference with Lawrence’s liberty was not arbitrary. The officers approached West, Lawrence, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Two citizen informants corroborated each other

CT: When two grounds are found to support the search, def on appeal has to challenge both

Defendant’s claim that the officers did not follow administrative regulations on conducting his parole search was moot where the trial court also found defendant consented to the search and he didn’t challenge consent. State v. Holley, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standards of review | Comments Off on CT: When two grounds are found to support the search, def on appeal has to challenge both

KS: CI’s tip insufficient; motion to suppress should have been granted

The alleged reasonable suspicion for extending defendant’s traffic stop was the CI’s information which is found insufficient. The state’s alternative basis of defendant’s alleged “jumpiness” was never presented to the trial court. There are no findings on that, it is … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: CI’s tip insufficient; motion to suppress should have been granted

W.D.Mo.: Observed drug deals with CI showed reliability and lack of staleness of information

A state court judge issued a tracking warrant for defendant’s car based on a heavily corroborated CI who did drug deals with the defendant while LEOs watched. This “shows that the confidential information was reliable and that the information was … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Observed drug deals with CI showed reliability and lack of staleness of information

D.Guam: CI’s tale insufficiently reliable for PC for arrest

A named CI arrested at the airport gave up defendant. The court finds the CI’s tale insufficient for probable cause for arrest, and the arrest and its fruits are suppressed. United States v. Duenas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91480 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Guam: CI’s tale insufficiently reliable for PC for arrest

IN: Anonymous report of man with gun wouldn’t alone support frisk, but def fled

Police received an anonymous tip that a man matching defendant’s description had a gun in a bar. The officer arrived right after the call and saw defendant. Under state case law, that alone wasn’t enough for a frisk without more. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on IN: Anonymous report of man with gun wouldn’t alone support frisk, but def fled

LA2: UT blanket probation search condition applied to probationer transferred to LA

Defendant was on probation out of Utah and supervised in Louisiana. His PO received information that he might have child pornography on his cell phone. During a PO visit, he was told to get his cell phone and computer out … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA2: UT blanket probation search condition applied to probationer transferred to LA

WV: Def’s brother was the CI for a DUI stop

Defendant’s brother was the citizen informant who reported he was driving under the influence, and he was giving the police information by phone about where he was. The stop was with reasonable suspicion. State v. Wood, 2017 W. Va. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WV: Def’s brother was the CI for a DUI stop

PA: A def’s “admission transmitted through an informant is only as reliable as its conduit is trustworthy”

“[A]n admission per se is inherently reliable evidence” sufficient to establish probable cause to arrest, but holding that “an admission transmitted through an informant is only as reliable as its conduit is trustworthy.” Commonwealth v. Stokes, 480 Pa. 38, 389 … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on PA: A def’s “admission transmitted through an informant is only as reliable as its conduit is trustworthy”

N.D.Ala.: Telling officer he could “check it” after request for consent is consent

The stop was on a city street, and defendant said the officer could “check it” when asked for consent. He was free to go [if he was willing to walk off from his car] when he consented. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Telling officer he could “check it” after request for consent is consent

E.D.Tenn.: Video showed clear consent and contradicted def’s testimony

Defendant consented to the search of her purse. The video clearly shows that, and it contradicts the defendant’s testimony. United States v. West, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58892 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 6, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58672 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Video showed clear consent and contradicted def’s testimony

CO: Unconscious [and dead] drivers have consented to a blood draw

Unconscious drivers have consented to a blood draw by statute, and it’s constitutional. People v. Hyde, 2017 CO 24, 2017 Colo. LEXIS 282 (April 17, 2017); People v. Simpson, 2017 CO 25, 2017 Colo. LEXIS 283 (April 17, 2017); Fitzgerald … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CO: Unconscious [and dead] drivers have consented to a blood draw

AK: Street rumor supplemented by controlled buy was PC

The CI passed on information from others that was virtually only a street rumor that he then corroborated with a controlled buy. The totality was probable cause. Hart v. State, 2017 Alas. App. LEXIS 59 (April 14, 2017). The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on AK: Street rumor supplemented by controlled buy was PC

SD: No corroboration of CI’s tip voided stop, even under Navarrette

“In each of the foregoing decisions, the stop at issue was upheld either because of independent observation by law-enforcement officers or because the tip itself demonstrated the informant’s basis of knowledge for alleging criminal conduct. In this case, the report … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SD: No corroboration of CI’s tip voided stop, even under Navarrette

PA: CI isn’t corroborated solely because he helped make another case

The CI led to another case, but the information here wasn’t corroborated and easily could have been. “We acknowledge that this is a close case. However, the police had every opportunity to pursue more substantial corroboration prior to preparing the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on PA: CI isn’t corroborated solely because he helped make another case

D.S.D.: CI tip provided RS for probation home search

The PO’s CI provided information which came to the PO through the police. There was no independent verification of the CI’s tale, but there was enough detail to provide reasonable suspicion for a home search under the conditions of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.S.D.: CI tip provided RS for probation home search

IN: Def handing CI a package risked CI handing it to police

The government’s CI was handling the package with drugs for the defendant to ship it, and he could consent to searching it. Erickson v. State, 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 140 (March 29, 2017). The CI’s information was against his self … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Def handing CI a package risked CI handing it to police