Category Archives: Automobile exception

N.D.W.Va.: A motion to suppress isn’t moot just because the govt says it won’t use the evidence in its case-in-chief; if it will to impeach, then the issue has to be resolved

Government’s agreeing it wouldn’t use the product of a search in its case in chief does not make it moot unless the government also says it won’t use it in impeachment. Then, it can only be used against the defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: A motion to suppress isn’t moot just because the govt says it won’t use the evidence in its case-in-chief; if it will to impeach, then the issue has to be resolved

N.D.Cal.: The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana does not make the smell of marijuana in a car no longer PC

The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana for small amounts does not make the smell of marijuana no longer probable cause. Here, there was a strong odor and defendant admitting he was carrying. An ounce or more would be an … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: The fact California has legalized recreational marijuana does not make the smell of marijuana in a car no longer PC

MS: No REP in calls from police station

Defendant’s calls from the police station after he was arrested admitted the marijuana in this case was his. The calls were admitted at trial, defense counsel challenging authentication. Defendant pro se argued a Fourth Amendment violation, but that is defaulted … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MS: No REP in calls from police station

WY: PC existed for vehicle search before dog was called in; legality of stop abandoned

Defendant’s three sentence motion to suppress said it would follow up with authority. The motion and hearing without that authority narrowed the scope of the claim and abandoned the justification for the stop and any state constitutional claim. What developed … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, State constitution | Comments Off on WY: PC existed for vehicle search before dog was called in; legality of stop abandoned

E.D.N.C.: Passenger’s possession of counterfeit drugs didn’t justify search of def’s car

Defendant’s passenger having alleged counterfeit drugs on his person didn’t provide probable cause for a search of defendant’s car under the automobile exception. United States v. Daughtridge, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115326 (E.D. N.C. July 11, 2018). You can’t relitigate … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Passenger’s possession of counterfeit drugs didn’t justify search of def’s car

N.D.Ill.: Collins v. Virginia doesn’t apply to a shared parking area which is not curtilage

Collins v. Virginia does not apply to shared parking areas which are not curtilage. “United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 16409 (2d Cir. June 19, 2018), Jones’s vehicle was parked in a parking lot behind the multi-family building … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Collins v. Virginia doesn’t apply to a shared parking area which is not curtilage

GA: No REP in data in car’s airbag control module

Defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data from his vehicle’s airbag control module, because, while an outside observer cannot ascertain the information regarding the use and function of a vehicle with the same precision, a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: No REP in data in car’s airbag control module

CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

Collins doesn’t provide a heightened expectation of privacy in a multi-family parking lot. “Jones does not dispute that the Dodge Magnum was inherently mobile. … We hold that the officers had probable cause to search the Dodge Magnum and that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: There was no heightened expectation of privacy under Collins v. Virginia in a multi-family parking lot

CT: Seeing sawed off shotgun through van window justified opening it up to seize it

The officers here saw a sawed off shotgun through the windows of defendant’s van, and it was not unreasonable to use the key fob to open the door to seize it. State v. Ortiz, 2018 Conn. App. LEXIS 235 (June … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CT: Seeing sawed off shotgun through van window justified opening it up to seize it

MA: Removing paint chips off a car under the automobile exception was reasonable

There was probable cause that defendant’s car was involved in a shooting such that its stop and search was reasonable under the automobile exception. That included removing paint chips from it when it had been removed to the police station. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: Removing paint chips off a car under the automobile exception was reasonable

Reason.com: Volokh Conspiracy: Collins v. Virginia and “the Conception Defining the Curtilage”

Reason.com: Volokh Conspiracy: Collins v. Virginia and “the Conception Defining the Curtilage” by Orin Kerr: A familiar idea “easily understood from our daily experience” — or is it?

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage | Comments Off on Reason.com: Volokh Conspiracy: Collins v. Virginia and “the Conception Defining the Curtilage”

SCOTUS: “The automobile exception does not permit the warrantless entry of a home or its curtilage in order to search a vehicle therein.”

The power of curtilage: Collins v. Virginia, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3210 (May 29, 2018) (8-1, Alito dissenting):

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Uncategorized | Comments Off on SCOTUS: “The automobile exception does not permit the warrantless entry of a home or its curtilage in order to search a vehicle therein.”

KS: Car search had PC, so trial court erred in suppressing

The trial court erred in suppressing the search of the car. There was probable cause for a search for drugs, and that allowed the officer to search anywhere drugs would be found. State v. Knight, 2018 Kan. App. LEXIS 28 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on KS: Car search had PC, so trial court erred in suppressing

CA5: Automobile exception applied; although def was handcuffed, wife showed up acting somewhat belligerently

Defendant was in custody, handcuffed and on the ground, but his wife showed up acting somewhat belligerent. Her presence satisfied exigency for the car search. United States v. Beene, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 11400 (5th Cir. May 2, 2018). Defense … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: Automobile exception applied; although def was handcuffed, wife showed up acting somewhat belligerently

MO: Warrantless seizure of black box data from semi violated 4A; automobile exception didn’t apply

After an accident, the information off the data recorder on defendant’s semi was seized and then searched by the police without a search warrant. The trial court suppressed, and the state filed an interlocutory appeal. Only three of its six … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on MO: Warrantless seizure of black box data from semi violated 4A; automobile exception didn’t apply

W.D.N.C.: 2255 is not the place to first litigate a suppression motion

2255 petitioner can’t raise his search and seizure claim via post-conviction relief where there was no effort to pursue the issue in the case on the merits. Even if he could, he’d lose on the merits of the search because … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: 2255 is not the place to first litigate a suppression motion

NJ: When driver can’t or won’t produce registration, a limited search for it is permissible

“Sufficient credible evidence supported the trial court’s determination that defendant was given an adequate opportunity to present the vehicle’s registration before the search commenced. When a driver is unwilling or unable to present proof of a vehicle’s ownership, a police … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NJ: When driver can’t or won’t produce registration, a limited search for it is permissible

CA10: Carelessly unloading watermelons from a box truck away from a loading dock and in middle of night with “nonsensical” answers was PC

Officers had probable cause to search defendants’ box truck. They were unloading watermelons in the middle of the night on wet grass and not at some loading dock coupled with all the unusual, vague, and even “nonsensical” excuses for why … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Carelessly unloading watermelons from a box truck away from a loading dock and in middle of night with “nonsensical” answers was PC

NJ: If driver can’t find registration after reasonable time, police can search for it

Defendant was given a reasonable amount of time to produce the registration of his vehicle. When he’s unwilling or unable to locate it, that justifies a limited “pinpoint” search of the vehicle for the registration in the glove box or … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NJ: If driver can’t find registration after reasonable time, police can search for it

CA6: Def’s car was still “mobile” for automobile exception despite the fact he was in jail

Defendant’s car was still “mobile” for Fourth Amendment purposes under the automobile exception despite the fact he was in jail. Thus, the defective search warrant is moot. United States v. Spillman, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 6950 (6th Cir. Mar. 19, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s car was still “mobile” for automobile exception despite the fact he was in jail