Category Archives: Franks doctrine

S.D.N.Y.: A Franks challenge that is nothing more than an argument about inferences doesn’t plead enough to get a hearing

A Franks challenge that is nothing more than an argument about inferences doesn’t plead enough to get a hearing. United States v. Defilippo, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22784 (S.D. N.Y. Jan. 31, 2018):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: A Franks challenge that is nothing more than an argument about inferences doesn’t plead enough to get a hearing

E.D.Mich.: State court’s finding def didn’t plead enough for Franks hearing was not “unreasonable” for AEDPA

Defendant didn’t plead enough to get a state court hearing on his Franks issue. The state court’s decision falls within Stone v. Powell’s “full and fair opportunity” to litigate, and he took that issue up on his state appeal. Rooks … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: State court’s finding def didn’t plead enough for Franks hearing was not “unreasonable” for AEDPA

D.Nev.: Def files a Franks challenge to a state issued SW, and the government says it won’t use the product of the search

The defendant filed a motion to suppress under Franks alleging numerous falsehoods in the search warrant application issued by a state judge in Arizona. “James is surprised by the government’s response. Rather than defend the credibility and integrity of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def files a Franks challenge to a state issued SW, and the government says it won’t use the product of the search

D.D.C.: It doesn’t violate Franks to fail to mention a Miranda violation to gain def’s admissions (no violatIon either)

Officers had probable cause for a warrantless arrest of defendant for child pornography. “But Mr. Lieu argues that the names ‘Dave’ and ‘John’ are relatively common names and that the clothing description is too general to support the connection that … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.D.C.: It doesn’t violate Franks to fail to mention a Miranda violation to gain def’s admissions (no violatIon either)

CA5: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives QI; def officer omitted material exculpatory evidence that led to ptf’s 15 min aquittal of murder

Plaintiff spent 16 months in jail awaiting trial for murder. He was acquitted in 15 minutes. He sued all the officers. After a prior appeal (Winfrey v. San Jacinto Cty., 481 Fed. Appx. 969 (5th Cir. 2012)), all that remains … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives QI; def officer omitted material exculpatory evidence that led to ptf’s 15 min aquittal of murder

GA: Affidavit as a whole made nexus with clear inference sought after evidence would be found

The affidavit for the search warrant as a whole made a clear inference that the evidence sought would be in the defendant’s house. The rule adopted by the court of appeals is too broad, but the decision is still affirmed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on GA: Affidavit as a whole made nexus with clear inference sought after evidence would be found

Lawfare: The Dubious Legal Claim Behind #ReleaseTheMemo

Lawfare: The Dubious Legal Claim Behind #ReleaseTheMemo by Orin Kerr: [Spoiler alert: I agree that it is more than dubious since two branches of our government have absolutely no clue what the Fourth Amendment means. It’s like a Franks challenge: … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Lawfare: The Dubious Legal Claim Behind #ReleaseTheMemo

E.D.Mich.: Franks challenge fails because there still would be PC

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails because, even accepting it as true, there’s still probable cause. United States v. Barclay, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12061 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2018).* “Probable cause ‘is not a high bar.’ Kaley v. United States, 134 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Franks challenge fails because there still would be PC

E.D.Mo.: Claim that Franks applies because the CI must have been paid and it was omitted is insufficient as speculative

“In his motion to suppress, Davison did not identify any false information included in the affidavit. Rather, Davison alleged only that he believed the CI could have been paid for information and that fact had been omitted from the affidavit. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Claim that Franks applies because the CI must have been paid and it was omitted is insufficient as speculative

D.Kan.: Search of a small container on a key chain was reasonable as search incident

“Here, the officers’ search of the container attached to Mr. Nichols’s keys was within the time, control, and place constraints for the search of an arrestee’s personal property incident to arrest. Mr. Nichols had the keychain in his exclusive control … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Search of a small container on a key chain was reasonable as search incident

D. Md.: Def’s 2255 supplemental Franks challenge has a failure of a proffer of evidence

Defendant had a Franks challenge and lost. One 2255 claim is that if defense counsel investigated more, it would have been a better Franks motion, but he fails to state what else would have been found to make it better. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on D. Md.: Def’s 2255 supplemental Franks challenge has a failure of a proffer of evidence

ID: Where probation agreement searches occur “at the request of” PO, searching without request was fatal

Defendant’s probation agreement said that he’d submit to probation searches “at the request of” the probation officer. Searching without a prior request was fatal. State v. Jaskowski, 2018 Ida. LEXIS 19 (Jan 18, 2018). “The Franks challenge to paragraph three … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ID: Where probation agreement searches occur “at the request of” PO, searching without request was fatal

CA5: On totality of affidavit, Franks challenge fails because officer’s error in affidavit was negligent and not reckless

The officer interviewed the Spanish speaking informant and prepared an affidavit with the gist of the conversation. The officer’s Spanish skills were limited, and he overstated the CI’s prior information. On the totality, the officer’s statement was merely negligent and … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: On totality of affidavit, Franks challenge fails because officer’s error in affidavit was negligent and not reckless

CA10: Franks doesn’t apply to private actors providing false information to LEOs

Even assuming private volunteer animal cruelty investigators provided false information that was used to get search warrants issued for plaintiffs’ property for evidence of cockfighting, qualified immunity applies because no case holds that the Franks doctrine applies to a private … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Franks doesn’t apply to private actors providing false information to LEOs

M.D.Ala.: Conclusorily pleading a Franks violation isn’t a sufficient offer of proof

Defendant fails in his Franks argument for a failure of an offer of proof. Merely conclusorily stating the issue isn’t enough. There has to be context and how it was knowingly false. United States v. Martin, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Conclusorily pleading a Franks violation isn’t a sufficient offer of proof

D.Ariz.: Squeezing a leather bag in a frisk and hearing bullets was reasonable

During a frisk, squeezing a leather bag without searching it was reasonable to look for a possible weapon. See United States v. Mattarolo, 209 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir. 2000). He heard the sound of bullets, and didn’t search further … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Squeezing a leather bag in a frisk and hearing bullets was reasonable

CA10: SW affidavit was detailed, and Franks challenge targeted def’s being in pen during conspiracy; not shown reckless under Franks and GFE applies

Officers obtained a search warrant for defendant’s house for evidence of drug dealing for his being involved with a gang for years. The affidavit was detailed except that it only suggested defendant’s and another’s incarceration for eight years in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA10: SW affidavit was detailed, and Franks challenge targeted def’s being in pen during conspiracy; not shown reckless under Franks and GFE applies

CA1: SW affidavit’s misstatements were careless at worst and not material to finding of PC

Defendant did not make the required showing that the search warrant affidavit misstatement that a black Volvo with the key license plate number was seen in the area of the fifth robbery was made intentionally rather than merely out of … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA1: SW affidavit’s misstatements were careless at worst and not material to finding of PC

CA2: In a § 1983 case alleging lack of PC from omission of information to issuing magistrate, it’s ptf’s burden

In this § 1983 case there was probable cause for issuance of an animal abuse warrant. To argue the probable cause was tainted by omission of information, plaintiff carries the burden, and here she failed. Kanciper v. Lato, 2017 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA2: In a § 1983 case alleging lack of PC from omission of information to issuing magistrate, it’s ptf’s burden

MD: Def agreed to postpone suppression hearing until trial and then didn’t bring it up; invited error and not preserved

Defendant failed to preserve his Fourth Amendment claims for appeal. You don’t get a hearing just by asking. He didn’t make a proffer in his Franks motion which was enough to deny it. Then, whatever issue was left, the defense … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MD: Def agreed to postpone suppression hearing until trial and then didn’t bring it up; invited error and not preserved