Category Archives: Warrant execution

NY1: Execution of SW on cell phone in police custody in 30 days not unreasonable

Defendant’s cell phones were already in the possession of the police, and the search warrant was deemed by its own language as executed on issuance. The actual search, however, took 30 days, and that wasn’t unreasonable. People v. Ruffin, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Collective knowledge, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY1: Execution of SW on cell phone in police custody in 30 days not unreasonable

WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

While an arrestee is entitled to a prompt notice of his right to counsel, police do not have to interrupt execution of a search warrant to do it. State v. Ackerman, 2019 Wash. App. LEXIS 3023 (Dec. 2, 2019). Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Arrestee’s right to advice of right to counsel doesn’t require stopping execution of SW to tell him

S.D.Ohio: Among eight 4A issues, none prevails; failure to provide inventory at the time of search is ministerial and requires a showing of prejudice

Defendant raised almost every conceivable Fourth Amendment and Rule 41 issue he could, and the district court rejects them all: (1) “The information in the affidavit is insufficient to support a finding of probable cause as to the crimes listed … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Among eight 4A issues, none prevails; failure to provide inventory at the time of search is ministerial and requires a showing of prejudice

PA: Refusing to submit to BAC blood draw under SW supports obstruction of justice conviction

Refusal to submit to a blood draw search warrant for BAC supports a conviction for obstruction of justice. Commonwealth v. Palchanes, 2019 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1186 (Nov. 27, 2019). The CI’s basis of knowledge and reliability was adequately shown, and … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: Refusing to submit to BAC blood draw under SW supports obstruction of justice conviction

IL: Once def was acquitted, seized computer data should have been returned, not searched again without a warrant

Defendant was a Peoria police officer being accused of sexual assault, and the Illinois State Police obtained a search warrant for his computer and other devices. The hard drives were copied with EnCase software. Defendant was tried on the sexual … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IL: Once def was acquitted, seized computer data should have been returned, not searched again without a warrant

M.D.Ala.: No 4A right via Rule 41 to have copy of SW at scene; no exclusion for failure to timely leave it

Rule 41 requires that a copy of the search warrant be left at the premises, but it grants no constitutional right to the target of the search to supervise the search. Moreover, failure to leave a copy of the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: No 4A right via Rule 41 to have copy of SW at scene; no exclusion for failure to timely leave it

CA4: “Filter Team” of govt agents and AUSAs violated separation of powers and A-C privilege

The USMJ’s ex parte creation of a “Filter Team” of federal agents and prosecutors to review the seizure of records from a law firm under a search warrant violates separation of powers and doesn’t adequately protect attorney-client privilege and work … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: “Filter Team” of govt agents and AUSAs violated separation of powers and A-C privilege

VA: Def’s refusal to submit to a SW for DNA could be argued as consciousness of guilt at trial

Defendant’s conscious refusal to submit to a DNA buccal swab sought by a search warrant could be argued as consciousness of guilt. Haas v. Commonwealth, 2019 Va. App. LEXIS 237 (Oct. 29. 2019). The officer’s knowledge from nearly six months … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on VA: Def’s refusal to submit to a SW for DNA could be argued as consciousness of guilt at trial

techdirt: Cops: People In Their Own Homes Are In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Whenever A Cop Enters Unlawfully

techdirt: Cops: People In Their Own Homes Are In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Whenever A Cop Enters Unlawfully by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on techdirt: Cops: People In Their Own Homes Are In The Wrong Place At The Wrong Time Whenever A Cop Enters Unlawfully

NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

The small town police department that obtained the search warrant did not have its own entry team for safety. Using officers from other county and state agencies to assist didn’t violate the warrant. People v. Ward, 2019 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY2: Where SW was issued to a small town PD, using officers from other agencies to assist in raid doesn’t violate 4A

N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

The search warrant said that is should be executed “immediately,” but officers waited two days to coordinate with the multiple agencies involved. Rule 41(e) says “execute the warrant within a specified time no longer than 14 days.” At worse, this … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: SW said “immediate search” but officers waited two days; not a 4A violation

E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

Defendant’s alleged mistreatment during the execution of the search warrant, which was only vaguely described in the opinion, even if provable, wouldn’t overcome the overwhelming proof of guilt. Here it was raised as an IAC claim. United States v. Puente, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Alleged mistreatment during SW execution doesn’t overcome overwhelming facts of guilt

E.D.Mo.: No const’l requirement copy of SW be left at site of search

2255 petitioner’s claims include one that the search should have been suppressed for state officers not leaving a copy of the search warrant at the site of the search. That’s not a constitutional defect. It’s a Rule 41 requirement, but … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No const’l requirement copy of SW be left at site of search

NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

There was a scrivener’s error in describing the cell phone subject to the search warrant, and it could be corrected by looking to the affidavit. State v. Stelly, 304 Neb. 33 (Sept. 13, 2019). Defendant has no claim that the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

WV Gazette: Officers found his $25K of heroin. He walked free, and now he’s suing police [for raiding the wrong house]

WV Gazette: Officers found his $25K of heroin. He walked free, and now he’s suing police by Jake Zuckerman. Police raided a house after falsely stating that one Figueroa lived there and made several drug deals. It was the wrong … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WV Gazette: Officers found his $25K of heroin. He walked free, and now he’s suing police [for raiding the wrong house]

CA4: USMJ must review law firm’s seized privileged materials, not USAO’s “filter team”

Two days after oral argument on a law firm’s appeal that a USMJ reviewed privileged materials seized from the firm by search warrant and not the USAO’s “filter team,” the Fourth Circuit orders the Magistrate to do it pending issuance … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: USMJ must review law firm’s seized privileged materials, not USAO’s “filter team”

CA9: The extreme of QI: officers alleged to have committed theft during execution of a SW get QI because no case says it’s a 4A violation

Officers get qualified immunity for alleged theft of $300,000 in cash and property from plaintiffs because it wasn’t clearly established that theft from a search is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Jessop v. City of Fresno, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA9: The extreme of QI: officers alleged to have committed theft during execution of a SW get QI because no case says it’s a 4A violation

N.D.Cal.: Compelled use of fingerprint to open cell phone not testimonial

The court at first declined to sign a search warrant for a cell phone that compelled use of a fingerprint to unlock it. After further submissions from the USAO and the FPD as invited amicus, the court concludes that a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Compelled use of fingerprint to open cell phone not testimonial

C.D.Ill.: Six month delay in searching cell phone wasn’t unreasonable considering how busy the officer was, which the government proved

It took nearly six months to search defendant’s cell phone after he consented to it because of other important matters the officer was working on. “The Mitchell court acknowledged that officer workload considerations could justify a delay in seeking a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Six month delay in searching cell phone wasn’t unreasonable considering how busy the officer was, which the government proved

D.Mont.: Destruction of a lockbox to search it was not unreasonable

Damaging a lockbox to open it under a search warrant was not unreasonable and doesn’t require suppression of its contents. Destruction of property is sometimes required to execute a search warrant: Dalia v. United States. United States v. Boeke, 2019 … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Destruction of a lockbox to search it was not unreasonable