NE: Scrivener’s error in describing cell phone in SW could be cured by reference to affidavit

There was a scrivener’s error in describing the cell phone subject to the search warrant, and it could be corrected by looking to the affidavit. State v. Stelly, 304 Neb. 33 (Sept. 13, 2019).

Defendant has no claim that the CI should have been permitted to be called by the defense at trial because there was no showing that the CI could help at all. Adams v. State, 2019 Del. LEXIS 427 (Sept. 13, 2019).

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.